Keychain VS NSUserDefaults

本文介绍了一种更安全的方法来存储用户凭据,通过使用iOS Keychain Services替代UserDefaults,采用一元函数对密码进行哈希处理,从而避免了密码被反向工程的风险。重点推荐了Apple提供的这一安全特性,以保护用户数据。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

Encryption will give you some security. The problem is your program would also have to decrypt the password, which means it must have the key stored in it somewhere. This will make it vulnerable to reverse-engineering. A better approach is to use an one-way function (such as a hash) on the password and store that hash value. When a user enters a password, you then apply the one-way function to the password and compare the result to the stored value. In this manner, the password cannot be compromised (well, there's always a dictionary attack, but that's a matter of password strength).

Instead of using NSUserDefaults, you would be better off using iOS Keychain Services. It's main purpose is to securely store user credentials. Apple has already done all the hard work for you. Take advantage of it.

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值