2018.7.14 toefl independent writing

When it comes to the issue about which way of getting information is better when considering which of the two cities to visit, people's opinion differs from person to person, and culture to culture. Some prefer reading about the places online believing they would easily obtain information about the latest discounts about the place. While others may argue what their friends state always proved to be authentic. As far as I am concerned, I prefer the latter one with the reasons below.

 

Firstly, friends, who are familiar with me, always give me information best relevant. What trouble some people most when they search on the online is bothering by the information that they don't interest in. For example, when last summer our family decided to go to another city near the sea to have to visit, what we constantly found was the information on discounts on seafood there, which we would never try because all of us are sensitive to seafood. However, it was not until consulting with our best friend Tom who had been there last summer that we finally found the kind of distinctive weed, we wanted to try to eat there. Had we asked our friends first, we would probably save us a lot of time to pinpoint the information we care.

 

Secondly, it is really hard for even the skillful people to distinguish the good information from the bad ones. With so many commands crowded online, not only good ones about how they had an interested vacation also bad ones stating they would never go there again, can make the traveler really get headache to decides to believe which statement. It just seems neither side is lack of evidence and both of them even provides concluded photos about how terrible the place was. However, it is much easier to decide which place to visit with the truthful friends. Because people can carefully select the reliable person to get the believable information about the place.

 

Thirdly, people would go both places can provide comparative information. The two places that people want to go can have lot of in common. However, the online information can be pretty similar. For example, when considering a trip to forest, two places can both have an intriguing description with tall trees existing there for hundreds of years, various cute animals with different fancy colors and so on. It may just seem that these two places are just the same for the traveler to make decision. However, the people who have tried both may provide really valuable information when make comparison between the two. They may remind that one of the forests often rains which can be pretty slippery, while the other is a bit of dry and safe when accompanied by kids or old people.

 

In conclusion, it is a better choice to ask friends who had visited both before travelling to the place themselves.

revise----------------------------------------------------------------------

When it comes to the issue about which way of getting information is better when considering which of the two cities to visit, people's opinion differs from person to person, and culture to culture. Some prefer reading about the places online believing they would easily obtain information about the latest discounts of the place. While others may argue what their friends state always proved to be authentic. As far as I am concerned, I prefer the latter one with the reasons below.

 

Firstly, friends, who are familiar with me, always give me information most relevant. What trouble some people most when they search on the online is bothering by the information that they aren't interest in. For example, last summer when our family decided to go to another city near the sea, what we constantly found was the information on discounts of seafood there, which we would never try because all of us are allergic to seafood. However, it was not until consulting with our best friend Tom who had been there last summer that we finally found the kind of unique seaweed, we wanted to try to eat there. Had we asked our friends first, we would probably save us a lot of time to pinpoint the information we care.

 

Secondly, it is really hard even for the skillful people to distinguish the good information from the bad ones. With so many commends crowded online, not only good ones about how they had an interested vacation also bad ones stating they would never go there again. It makes the traveler really get headache to decide to believe which statement. It just seems neither side is lack of evidence and both of them even provide concluded photos about how terrible the place was. However, it is much easier to decide which place to visit with the truthful friends. Because people can carefully select the reliable person to get the believable information about the place.

 

Thirdly, better comparison information can be obtained from an experienced traveler who have been to both places. Struggling with whether going to a beach with sunshine and cool breeze or climbing a famous mountain with millions of delicate exhibits can be frustrated when numerous fantastic sceneries about these places have shown online to people who already don’t know where to go. However, they would make a decision pretty quickly after their friends argued about how crowded and hot it was when going to the mountain at this season. Additionally, people will trap in a dilemma when they have collected online information on two forests, each of them has its unique creatures and special sceneries. A friend, on the other hand, may provide with an invaluable advice that one of the forests is often rainy and foggy which can be pretty slippery while another means a safer and sounder trip when taking the children and the old along.

 

In conclusion, it is a better choice to ask friends who had been both places before travelling decision.