http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/fcntl.2.html
int fcntl(int fd, int cmd, ... /* arg */ );
fcntl函数是一个复杂功能强大的函数,关于文件锁的用法如下:
Advisory record locking
Linux implements traditional ("process-associated") UNIX record
locks, as standardized by POSIX. For a Linux-specific alternative
with better semantics, see the discussion of open file description
locks below.
F_SETLK, F_SETLKW, and F_GETLK are used to acquire, release, and test
for the existence of record locks (also known as byte-range, file-
segment, or file-region locks). The third argument, lock, is a
pointer to a structure that has at least the following fields (in
unspecified order).
struct flock {
...
short l_type; /* Type of lock: F_RDLCK,
F_WRLCK, F_UNLCK */
short l_whence; /* How to interpret l_start:
SEEK_SET, SEEK_CUR, SEEK_END */
off_t l_start; /* Starting offset for lock */
off_t l_len; /* Number of bytes to lock */
pid_t l_pid; /* PID of process blocking our lock
(set by F_GETLK and F_OFD_GETLK) */
...
};
The l_whence, l_start, and l_len fields of this structure specify the
range of bytes we wish to lock. Bytes past the end of the file may
be locked, but not bytes before the start of the file.
l_start is the starting offset for the lock, and is interpreted
relative to either: the start of the file (if l_whence is SEEK_SET);
the current file offset (if l_whence is SEEK_CUR); or the end of the
file (if l_whence is SEEK_END). In the final two cases, l_start can
be a negative number provided the offset does not lie before the
start of the file.
l_len specifies the number of bytes to be locked. If l_len is
positive, then the range to be locked covers bytes l_start up to and
including l_start+l_len-1. Specifying 0 for l_len has the special
meaning: lock all bytes starting at the location specified by
l_whence and l_start through to the end of file, no matter how large
the file grows.
POSIX.1-2001 allows (but does not require) an implementation to
support a negative l_len value; if l_len is negative, the interval
described by lock covers bytes l_start+l_len up to and including
l_start-1. This is supported by Linux since kernel versions 2.4.21
and 2.5.49.
The l_type field can be used to place a read (F_RDLCK) or a write
(F_WRLCK) lock on a file. Any number of processes may hold a read
lock (shared lock) on a file region, but only one process may hold a
write lock (exclusive lock). An exclusive lock excludes all other
locks, both shared and exclusive. A single process can hold only one
type of lock on a file region; if a new lock is applied to an
already-locked region, then the existing lock is converted to the new
lock type. (Such conversions may involve splitting, shrinking, or
coalescing with an existing lock if the byte range specified by the
new lock does not precisely coincide with the range of the existing
lock.)
F_SETLK (struct flock *)
Acquire a lock (when l_type is F_RDLCK or F_WRLCK) or release
a lock (when l_type is F_UNLCK) on the bytes specified by the
l_whence, l_start, and l_len fields of lock. If a conflicting
lock is held by another process, this call returns -1 and sets
errno to EACCES or EAGAIN. (The error returned in this case
differs across implementations, so POSIX requires a portable
application to check for both errors.)
F_SETLKW (struct flock *)
As for F_SETLK, but if a conflicting lock is held on the file,
then wait for that lock to be released. If a signal is caught
while waiting, then the call is interrupted and (after the
signal handler has returned) returns immediately (with return
value -1 and errno set to EINTR; see signal(7)).
F_GETLK (struct flock *)
On input to this call, lock describes a lock we would like to
place on the file. If the lock could be placed, fcntl() does
not actually place it, but returns F_UNLCK in the l_type field
of lock and leaves the other fields of the structure
unchanged.
If one or more incompatible locks would prevent this lock
being placed, then fcntl() returns details about one of those
locks in the l_type, l_whence, l_start, and l_len fields of
lock. If the conflicting lock is a traditional (process-
associated) record lock, then the l_pid field is set to the
PID of the process holding that lock. If the conflicting lock
is an open file description lock, then l_pid is set to -1.
Note that the returned information may already be out of date
by the time the caller inspects it.
In order to place a read lock, fd must be open for reading. In order
to place a write lock, fd must be open for writing. To place both
types of lock, open a file read-write.
When placing locks with F_SETLKW, the kernel detects deadlocks,
whereby two or more processes have their lock requests mutually
blocked by locks held by the other processes. For example, suppose
process A holds a write lock on byte 100 of a file, and process B
holds a write lock on byte 200. If each process then attempts to
lock the byte already locked by the other process using F_SETLKW,
then, without deadlock detection, both processes would remain blocked
indefinitely. When the kernel detects such deadlocks, it causes one
of the blocking lock requests to immediately fail with the error
EDEADLK; an application that encounters such an error should release
some of its locks to allow other applications to proceed before
attempting regain the locks that it requires. Circular deadlocks
involving more than two processes are also detected. Note, however,
that there are limitations to the kernel's deadlock-detection
algorithm; see BUGS.
As well as being removed by an explicit F_UNLCK, record locks are
automatically released when the process terminates.
Record locks are not inherited by a child created via fork(2), but
are preserved across an execve(2).
Because of the buffering performed by the stdio(3) library, the use
of record locking with routines in that package should be avoided;
use read(2) and write(2) instead.
The record locks described above are associated with the process
(unlike the open file description locks described below). This has
some unfortunate consequences:
* If a process closes any file descriptor referring to a file, then
all of the process's locks on that file are released, regardless
of the file descriptor(s) on which the locks were obtained. This
is bad: it means that a process can lose its locks on a file such
as /etc/passwd or /etc/mtab when for some reason a library
function decides to open, read, and close the same file.
* The threads in a process share locks. In other words, a
multithreaded program can't use record locking to ensure that
threads don't simultaneously access the same region of a file.
Open file description locks solve both of these problems.
Open file description locks (non-POSIX)
Open file description locks are advisory byte-range locks whose
operation is in most respects identical to the traditional record
locks described above. This lock type is Linux-specific, and
available since Linux 3.15. For an explanation of open file
descriptions, see open(2).
The principal difference between the two lock types is that whereas
traditional record locks are associated with a process, open file
description locks are associated with the open file description on
which they are acquired, much like locks acquired with flock(2).
Consequently (and unlike traditional advisory record locks), open
file description locks are inherited across fork(2) (and clone(2)
with CLONE_FILES), and are only automatically released on the last
close of the open file description, instead of being released on any
close of the file.
Open file description locks always conflict with traditional record
locks, even when they are acquired by the same process on the same
file descriptor.
Open file description locks placed via the same open file description
(i.e., via the same file descriptor, or via a duplicate of the file
descriptor created by fork(2), dup(2), fcntl(2) F_DUPFD, and so on)
are always compatible: if a new lock is placed on an already locked
region, then the existing lock is converted to the new lock type.
(Such conversions may result in splitting, shrinking, or coalescing
with an existing lock as discussed above.)
On the other hand, open file description locks may conflict with each
other when they are acquired via different open file descriptions.
Thus, the threads in a multithreaded program can use open file
description locks to synchronize access to a file region by having
each thread perform its own open(2) on the file and applying locks
via the resulting file descriptor.
As with traditional advisory locks, the third argument to fcntl(),
lock, is a pointer to an flock structure. By contrast with
traditional record locks, the l_pid field of that structure must be
set to zero when using the commands described below.
The commands for working with open file description locks are
analogous to those used with traditional locks:
F_OFD_SETLK (struct flock *)
Acquire an open file description lock (when l_type is F_RDLCK
or F_WRLCK) or release an open file description lock (when
l_type is F_UNLCK) on the bytes specified by the l_whence,
l_start, and l_len fields of lock. If a conflicting lock is
held by another process, this call returns -1 and sets errno
to EAGAIN.
F_OFD_SETLKW (struct flock *)
As for F_OFD_SETLK, but if a conflicting lock is held on the
file, then wait for that lock to be released. If a signal is
caught while waiting, then the call is interrupted and (after
the signal handler has returned) returns immediately (with
return value -1 and errno set to EINTR; see signal(7)).
F_OFD_GETLK (struct flock *)
On input to this call, lock describes an open file description
lock we would like to place on the file. If the lock could be
placed, fcntl() does not actually place it, but returns
F_UNLCK in the l_type field of lock and leaves the other
fields of the structure unchanged. If one or more
incompatible locks would prevent this lock being placed, then
details about one of these locks are returned via lock, as
described above for F_GETLK.
In the current implementation, no deadlock detection is performed for
open file description locks. (This contrasts with process-associated
record locks, for which the kernel does perform deadlock detection.)
Mandatory locking
Warning: the Linux implementation of mandatory locking is unreliable.
See BUGS below.
By default, both traditional (process-associated) and open file
description record locks are advisory. Advisory locks are not
enforced and are useful only between cooperating processes.
Both lock types can also be mandatory. Mandatory locks are enforced
for all processes. If a process tries to perform an incompatible
access (e.g., read(2) or write(2)) on a file region that has an
incompatible mandatory lock, then the result depends upon whether the
O_NONBLOCK flag is enabled for its open file description. If the
O_NONBLOCK flag is not enabled, then the system call is blocked until
the lock is removed or converted to a mode that is compatible with
the access. If the O_NONBLOCK flag is enabled, then the system call
fails with the error EAGAIN.
To make use of mandatory locks, mandatory locking must be enabled
both on the filesystem that contains the file to be locked, and on
the file itself. Mandatory locking is enabled on a filesystem using
the "-o mand" option to mount(8), or the MS_MANDLOCK flag for
mount(2). Mandatory locking is enabled on a file by disabling group
execute permission on the file and enabling the set-group-ID
permission bit (see chmod(1) and chmod(2)).
Mandatory locking is not specified by POSIX. Some other systems also
support mandatory locking, although the details of how to enable it
vary across systems.