【Zookeeper】——Why should we use zookeeper?

本文探讨了服务发现的重要性和选择Zookeeper作为服务发现工具的原因。文章分析了在分布式系统中使用服务发现的需求,并讨论了不同服务发现解决方案的特点,最终指出了服务发现面临的挑战。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

Table of content

When we learn something ,we should ask ourselves some questions,such as what is it ? why should we use it ?how to use it? when to use it and where to use it ?

Now,in this article we have three questions:

The first —— why should we use Services Discovery?

The second ——why do we choose zookeeper to do this kind of things?

The third ——what are the challenges o discovery services?

So,it’s time to give the answers!

why should we use Services Discovery

In our old ITOO project(a distributed system), if we want to invoke other services ,we should now what is the service’s name ,where is it ? we should know the exactly position of the service,you should know the service’s url then use the JNDI technology to find it.You know in this way,if we change the service’s url,we should change every services that invoke this service,it’s difficult to maintence.So we should use a concentrated position to manage all services,make it easy to pulish and discovery.

why do we choose zookeeper to do this kind of things?

You know there are many services discovery service,which should I choose? The services that we can use are DNS,Zookeeper,etcd,doorerd ,Consul,Eureka and forth on !

Oh, my God,there are so many,what is the right one to our project?maybe we should check each of that services and compare the differents to find the most suitable one.

As mentioned DNS has been used for a long time and is probably the largest Service Discovery system out there. For small-scale setups start with DNS but once you start provisioning nodes more dynamically, DNS starts becoming problematic due to the propagation time.

Arguably, Zookeeper is the most mature of the config stores used for discovery since it has been around for quite some time and is a comprehensive solution including configuration management, leader election, distributed locking etc. This makes it a very compelling general-purpose solution although it’s often more complex than it could be.

etcd & doozerd are the new age cousins of Zookeeper, built with similar architectures and features sets and hence can be used interchangeably in place of Zookeeper

Consul is a newer solution in this space that provides configuration management and a generic key-value store apart from Service Discovery. It also has killer features of health checking of nodes and supporting DNS SRV for improved interop with other systems. A big differentiator from Zookeeper is the HTTP & DNS APIs that can be used to interact with consul vis-à-vis a Zookeeper client.

If you lean more towards AP systems Eureka is a great choice and is battle tested in Netflix and it prefers Availability over Consistency in the wake of network partitions.

So,maybe zookeeper is the most suitable one for our project.

what are the challenges o discovery services?

It’s more complicated than you realize: it’s an extension of the distributed systems problem.

You might roll out configuration files with service names, IPs and ports but when the system becomes very dynamic you need to migrate to a “real” Service Discovery solution and that migration is usually not as easy as you think. One of the biggest challenges is the inability to understand how intrusive the choice of a Service Discovery system is: once chosen it is very difficult to change it and hence it is critical to do it right.

Most systems implement some form of distributed consensus algorithms, designed to be resilient in the face of node outages, but these algorithms are notoriously hard to get right and understanding failure modes is both key and difficult and failing to analyse them correctly usually takes you to make the wrong choices.

All the questions are answered,here is my summary about the Services Discovery

这里写图片描述

Summary

In this article,some ideas come from other people,some of come from mine,but it doesn’t matter,just do it,then do it better!

内容概要:该研究通过在黑龙江省某示范村进行24小时实地测试,比较了燃煤炉具与自动/手动进料生物质炉具的污染物排放特征。结果显示,生物质炉具相比燃煤炉具显著降低了PM2.5、CO和SO2的排放(自动进料分别降低41.2%、54.3%、40.0%;手动进料降低35.3%、22.1%、20.0%),但NOx排放未降低甚至有所增加。研究还发现,经济性和便利性是影响生物质炉具推广的重要因素。该研究不仅提供了实际排放数据支持,还通过Python代码详细复现了排放特征比较、减排效果计算和结果可视化,进一步探讨了燃料性质、动态排放特征、碳平衡计算以及政策建议。 适合人群:从事环境科学研究的学者、政府环保部门工作人员、能源政策制定者、关注农村能源转型的社会人士。 使用场景及目标:①评估生物质炉具在农村地区的推广潜力;②为政策制定者提供科学依据,优化补贴政策;③帮助研究人员深入了解生物质炉具的排放特征和技术改进方向;④为企业研发更高效的生物质炉具提供参考。 其他说明:该研究通过大量数据分析和模拟,揭示了生物质炉具在实际应用中的优点和挑战,特别是NOx排放增加的问题。研究还提出了多项具体的技术改进方向和政策建议,如优化进料方式、提高热效率、建设本地颗粒厂等,为生物质炉具的广泛推广提供了可行路径。此外,研究还开发了一个智能政策建议生成系统,可以根据不同地区的特征定制化生成政策建议,为农村能源转型提供了有力支持。
评论 21
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包

打赏作者

幸运的梦之星

你的鼓励将是我创作的最大动力

¥1 ¥2 ¥4 ¥6 ¥10 ¥20
扫码支付:¥1
获取中
扫码支付

您的余额不足,请更换扫码支付或充值

打赏作者

实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值