一. 为什么SimpleDateFormat不是线程安全的?
Java源码如下:
/**
* Date formats are not synchronized.
* It is recommended to create separate format instances for each thread.
* If multiple threads access a format concurrently, it must be synchronized
* externally.
*/
public class SimpleDateFormat extends DateFormat {
public Date parse(String text, ParsePosition pos){
calendar.clear(); // Clears all the time fields
// other logic ...
Date parsedDate = calendar.getTime();
}
}
abstract class DateFormat{
// other logic ...
protected Calendar calendar;
public Date parse(String source) throws ParseException{
ParsePosition pos = new ParsePosition(0);
Date result = parse(source, pos);
if (pos.index == 0)
throw new ParseException("Unparseable date: \"" + source + "\"" ,
pos.errorIndex);
return result;
}
}
如果我们把SimpleDateFormat定义成static成员变量,那么多个thread之间会共享这个sdf对象, 所以Calendar对象也会共享。
假定线程A和线程B都进入了parse(text, pos) 方法, 线程B执行到calendar.clear()后,线程A执行到calendar.getTime(), 那么就会有问题。
二. 问题重现:
public class DateFormatTest {
private static SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMM-yyyy", Locale.US);
private static String date[] = { "01-Jan-1999", "01-Jan-2000", "01-Jan-2001" };
public static void main(String[] args) {
for (int i = 0; i < date.length; i++) {
final int temp = i;
new Thread(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
while (true) {
String str1 = date[temp];
String str2 = sdf.format(sdf.parse(str1));
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + ", " + str1 + "," + str2);
if(!str1.equals(str2)){
throw new RuntimeException(Thread.currentThread().getName()
+ ", Expected " + str1 + " but got " + str2);
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException("parse failed", e);
}
}
}).start();
}
}
}
创建三个进程, 使用静态成员变量SimpleDateFormat的parse和format方法,然后比较经过这两个方法折腾后的值是否相等:
程序如果出现以下错误,说明传入的日期就串掉了,即SimpleDateFormat不是线程安全的:
Exception in thread "Thread-0" java.lang.RuntimeException: parse failed
at cn.test.DateFormatTest$1.run(DateFormatTest.java:27)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Thread-0, Expected 01-Jan-1999 but got 01-Jan-2000
at cn.test.DateFormatTest$1.run(DateFormatTest.java:22)
... 1 more
三. 解决方案:
1. 解决方案a:
将SimpleDateFormat定义成局部变量:
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMM-yyyy", Locale.US);
String str1 = "01-Jan-2010";
String str2 = sdf.format(sdf.parse(str1));
缺点:每调用一次方法就会创建一个SimpleDateFormat对象,方法结束又要作为垃圾回收。
2. 解决方案b:
加一把线程同步锁:synchronized(lock)
public class SyncDateFormatTest {
private static SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMM-yyyy", Locale.US);
private static String date[] = { "01-Jan-1999", "01-Jan-2000", "01-Jan-2001" };
public static void main(String[] args) {
for (int i = 0; i < date.length; i++) {
final int temp = i;
new Thread(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
try {
while (true) {
synchronized (sdf) {
String str1 = date[temp];
Date date = sdf.parse(str1);
String str2 = sdf.format(date);
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName() + ", " + str1 + "," + str2);
if(!str1.equals(str2)){
throw new RuntimeException(Thread.currentThread().getName()
+ ", Expected " + str1 + " but got " + str2);
}
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException("parse failed", e);
}
}
}).start();
}
}
}
缺点:性能较差,每次都要等待锁释放后其他线程才能进入
3. 解决方案c: (推荐)
使用ThreadLocal: 每个线程都将拥有自己的SimpleDateFormat对象副本。
写一个工具类:
public class DateUtil {
private static ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat> local = new ThreadLocal<SimpleDateFormat>();
public static Date parse(String str) throws Exception {
SimpleDateFormat sdf = local.get();
if (sdf == null) {
sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMM-yyyy", Locale.US);
local.set(sdf);
}
return sdf.parse(str);
}
public static String format(Date date) throws Exception {
SimpleDateFormat sdf = local.get();
if (sdf == null) {
sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("dd-MMM-yyyy", Locale.US);
local.set(sdf);
}
return sdf.format(date);
}
}
最佳方案、使用org.apache.commons.lang3.time.DateFormatUtils下的方法(推荐)
DateFormatUtils.format(new Date(), "yyyyMMddHHmmss")
注意:该类使用了org.apache.commons.lang3.time.FastDateFormat(是一个线程安全的DateFormat)作为底层