JSF – Pluggable View Handler

本文探讨了JSF与JSP的整合问题,指出了使用JSP与JSF一起工作可能导致的性能问题,并通过Facelets框架提供了一种更高效的替代方案。介绍了JSF和JSP的基本概念、JSP的历史、JSF与JSP的不兼容性,以及如何在实际应用中遇到整合问题时进行优化。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

1.      What does View Handler do

In JSF Specifiction,  the JSF implemenation must have a default ViewHandler. No matter how to implement it, there must be three primary methods: createView(), renderView(), and restoreView().

In other words, we may have custom ViewHandler to replace the default one. MyFaces implementation has JspViewHandlerImpl as default ViewHandler. As we known, there is another thirdparty framework which have another ViewHandler – Facelets.

 

2.    Review for JSP

           JSP was written so that authoring servlets would be easier. JSP pages are servlets, nothing more. Using a JSP compiler, a JSP file is compiled into a Java Servlet. Before tag libraries were introduced, JSP pages simply were compiled down into System.out.println(...); statements

       Tag libraries enhanced JSP by providing an API to tag authors to write Java code that would not have to be embedded in <% ... %> tags. The tags gave developers access to the text content of the tag body so that they could alter it or use it in a custom way. After some time, Sun released the Java standard tag library API, also known as the JSTL.

3.    JSF with JSP

JSF is a component technology, and architecturally is not related to JSP at all. That means ISF is original designed to produced HTML content to the client by the processing of a component tree by renderers. This design is much more similar to Swing than it is custom JSP.

Andrew Robinson said that using JSP with JSF has drawbacks, included serious performance implications due to the architecture of JSP and how the JSP view handler works.  And what’s more, it is just a trick of Sun. He said “Sun probably made the default view handler as one that uses JSP, so they would not have to admit that JSP did not meet the needs of users and needed to be replaced.”

4.      JspDefaultViewHandler

JspDefaultViewHandler is a typital ViewHandler which mixuse JSF with JSP.  In the template page, it mix JSF tag and JSP tag. We may have a look that when reqeust an JSF page, how it works.

o Initial request (e.g. index.jsf)

1.      FacesServlet gets the request and JSF lifecycle begins

2.      restoreState returns null and a new view is created (createView) with view id = index.jsp (jsp is the default suffix)

3.      lifecycle jumps to renderResponse

4.      renderView is called that dispatches index.jsp to the container

5.      Container traverses all the tags (include JSF & JSP), tags call component’s encode methods during component tree is created

6.      State is saved via writeState and buffered output is rendered to the client.

 

Unfortunately, JSP and JSF don’t natuarally complement each other. As I mentioned earlier, JSP is used to create static or dynamic web content, but not to create component trees. İt is called by container, and its elements are processed in a page from top to button which as response. However, JSF has a complex life cycle, and those components are generated and rendered in clearly separated phases. So, when used them together, JSP and JSF both write output to response, but they work differently: JSP creates output as soon as it finds JSP contents, whereas JSF component dictate its own rendering, it means that when it finds JSF contents, it would NOT produce output UNTIL the closing tag of JSF reached.

The following code can not work as expect:

  <h:panelGroup>

                             <h:outputText value="I am first lar" />

                                         I am second lor

                                         <br/>

        </h:panelGroup>

 

The output was :

I am second lor

I am first lar

 

There is another example to explain the merchadism:

 

  <h:dataTable var="_row" value="#{reportHandler.currentReportEntries}">

      <h:column> 

       <c:choose> 

                 <c:when test="#{_row.type == 1}">

                              <h:inputText id="inputText1" value="#{_row.amount}" />

                   </c:when>

                    <c:otherwise>

                              <h:outputText id="inputText2" value="#{_row.amount}" />

                   </c:otherwise>

        </c:choose> 

     </h:column>

  </h:dataTable>

 

Data table component and Column component created from its JSP tag.  As we discussed before, most of the “work” of a JSF component takes place when it met closing tag (during rendering).  It means that the “var” variable of <h:dataTable> was sets up until it met closing tag.  But since JSTL tags are plain JSP tags, it works when container meets it. While the when tag in the choose attempts to evaluate #{_row.type == 1},  the “_row” is not bound yet in the EL resolver, null is returned.  So the output text component is creatd by its tag.

 

 

5.    FaceletsViewHandler

Facelets is similar in its behavior to JSP although it has much more efficient code and is designed quite differently than JSP, because no Java bytecode is actully generated and complied behind the scenes when you first visit your page. Instead of JSP tags, facelets has TagHandlers. These tag handlers analyze the XML content of a facelet and create components.

Also, we may have a look that when initial reqeust an JSF page, how it works.

o Initial request (e.g. index.jsf)

1.      FacesServlet gets the request and JSF lifecycle begins

2.      restoreState returns null and a new view is created (createView) with view id = index.jsp (jsp is the default suffix)

3.      lifecycle jumps to renderResponse

4.      renderView calls buildView() to derive the target template file (index.jsp), and compile its content (include JSF, JSP, HTML contents)  into UIViewRoot component.

5.      renderView recursive all component' encode methods to produce HTML(or target formation) to response.

6.      State is saved via writeState and buffered output is rendered to the client.
内容概要:该研究通过在黑龙江省某示范村进行24小时实地测试,比较了燃煤炉具与自动/手动进料生物质炉具的污染物排放特征。结果显示,生物质炉具相比燃煤炉具显著降低了PM2.5、CO和SO2的排放(自动进料分别降低41.2%、54.3%、40.0%;手动进料降低35.3%、22.1%、20.0%),但NOx排放未降低甚至有所增加。研究还发现,经济性和便利性是影响生物质炉具推广的重要因素。该研究不仅提供了实际排放数据支持,还通过Python代码详细复现了排放特征比较、减排效果计算和结果可视化,进一步探讨了燃料性质、动态排放特征、碳平衡计算以及政策建议。 适合人群:从事环境科学研究的学者、政府环保部门工作人员、能源政策制定者、关注农村能源转型的社会人士。 使用场景及目标:①评估生物质炉具在农村地区的推广潜力;②为政策制定者提供科学依据,优化补贴政策;③帮助研究人员深入了解生物质炉具的排放特征和技术改进方向;④为企业研发更高效的生物质炉具提供参考。 其他说明:该研究通过大量数据分析和模拟,揭示了生物质炉具在实际应用中的优点和挑战,特别是NOx排放增加的问题。研究还提出了多项具体的技术改进方向和政策建议,如优化进料方式、提高热效率、建设本地颗粒厂等,为生物质炉具的广泛推广提供了可行路径。此外,研究还开发了一个智能政策建议生成系统,可以根据不同地区的特征定制化生成政策建议,为农村能源转型提供了有力支持。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值