DDES9903 Narrative and Sensemaking


Assessment 1 Brief: Digital

Walkthrough for Linear Story

DDES9903 | Narrative and Sensemaking in Immersive Environments

Assessment Task 1: Digital Walkthrough for Linear Story

WEIGHT 40%

ASSESSMENT TYPE Project

GROUP WORK No

DUE DATE Week 5 Friday 11:55 pm AEST

SUBMISSION What to Submit

REQUIREMENTS An electronic PDF containing a design report of 1000 words (maximum) + a functional

interactive storyboard (a WebGL folder of your digital walkthrough)

Where to Submit

Moodle Submission Portal

The final submission will be checked for originality through Turnitin when you submit.

Penalties may apply for late submission as indicated in the course outline.

Background

The techniques of storytelling have evolved over thousands of years. While they may differ slightly in different

cultures, humanity has used them in literature and theatre since ancient times. In our field of Immersive Design, we

benefit greatly from understanding these traditional techniques. A challenge (and opportunity) that we have is

integrating these traditional techniques with the new tools we have at our disposal.

Assessment Description

You are asked to demonstrate your understanding of traditional western story structures and the successful use

of immersive design to convey a linear story. Use immersive design elements to portray:

1. Exposition

2. Complication/rise/tension building

3. Climax and resolution/denouement.

Start with a very small foundation story (8-12 sentences) that uses the story structures discussed in class. This

may be a re-mixed version of pre-existing content or an original creation. You can then use this as a basis for an

“digital walkthrough” in which you use immersive design elements to convey each part of your story.

“Digital Walkthrough” in this context is a very low fidelity prototype that conveys your story with enough detail to

give a viewer a coherent understanding of your story design. A viewer should be able to independently interact with

your walkthrough and clearly see your design intentions to convey each part of your story. However, the prototype

does not necessarily need to be fully functional.

You must also include a short design report specifying and explaining your design choices. Did you encounter any

difficulties during the process? What was your solution? You are required to support your design choices with

class materials and/or articles.

DDES9903 Narrative and Sensemaking in Immersive Environments | Assessment 1 Brief 1

Assessment 1 Brief: Digital

Walkthrough for Linear Story

DDES9903 | Narrative and Sensemaking in Immersive Environments

Assessment 1 Criteria: Digital Walkthrough for Linear Story

Criteria & Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction

Weighting (<50) (50 – 64) (65 – 74) (75 – 84) (85 – 100)

Story Structure Demonstrates poor Demonstrates basic Demonstrates highly Demonstrates Demonstrates

understanding of functional functional considered sophisticated

60% traditional story understanding of understanding of understanding of understanding of

structures. Story traditional story traditional story traditional story traditional story

structure has multiple structures. Story structures. Story structures. Story structures. Story

missing stages, or the structure has a structure has all major structure is highly structure is highly

majority of stages missing stage, or some stages and is coherent, with coherent, with some

require more stages require greater adequately articulated. appropriate use of all innovative use of some

articulation. articulation. major stages. major stages.

Execution Demonstrates Demonstrates basic Demonstrates some Demonstrates well Demonstrates

incoherent use of use of multimodal, considered use of considered use of sophisticated use of

40% multimodal, spatial, spatial, and enacted multimodal, spatial, multimodal, spatial, multimodal, spatial

and enacted elements elements to convey and enacted elements and enacted elements and enacted elements

to convey linear linear narrative. to convey linear to convey linear to convey linear

narrative. Demonstrates basic narrative. narrative. narrative.

Demonstrates little functional Demonstrates highly Demonstrates well Demonstrates

understanding of understanding of functional considered sophisticated

existing theory to existing theory to understanding of understanding of understanding of

justify usage of said justify usage of said existing theory to existing theory to existing theory to

elements. elements. justify usage of said justify usage of said justify usage of said

elements. elements. elements.

DDES9903 Narrative and Sensemaking in Immersive Environments | Assessment 1 Brief 2

【事件触发一致性】研究多智能体网络如何通过分布式事件驱动控制实现有限时间内的共识(Matlab代码实现)内容概要:本文围绕多智能体网络中的事件触发一致性问题,研究如何通过分布式事件驱动控制实现有限时间内的共识,并提供了相应的Matlab代码实现方案。文中探讨了事件触发机制在降低通信负担、提升系统效率方面的优势,重点分析了多智能体系统在有限时间收敛的一致性控制策略,涉及系统模型构建、触发条件设计、稳定性与收敛性分析等核心技术环节。此外,文档还展示了该技术在航空航天、电力系统、机器人协同、无人机编队等多个前沿领域的潜在应用,体现了其跨学科的研究价值和工程实用性。; 适合人群:具备一定控制理论基础和Matlab编程能力的研究生、科研人员及从事自动化、智能系统、多智能体协同控制等相关领域的工程技术人员。; 使用场景及目标:①用于理解和实现多智能体系统在有限时间内达成一致的分布式控制方法;②为事件触发控制、分布式优化、协同控制等课题提供算法设计与仿真验证的技术参考;③支撑科研项目开发、学术论文复现及工程原型系统搭建; 阅读建议:建议结合文中提供的Matlab代码进行实践操作,重点关注事件触发条件的设计逻辑与系统收敛性证明之间的关系,同时可延伸至其他应用场景进行二次开发与性能优化。
【四旋翼无人机】具备螺旋桨倾斜机构的全驱动四旋翼无人机:建模与控制研究(Matlab代码、Simulink仿真实现)内容概要:本文围绕具备螺旋桨倾斜机构的全驱动四旋翼无人机展开,重点研究其动力学建模与控制系统设计。通过Matlab代码与Simulink仿真实现,详细阐述了该类无人机的运动学与动力学模型构建过程,分析了螺旋桨倾斜机构如何提升无人机的全向机动能力与姿态控制性能,并设计相应的控制策略以实现稳定飞行与精确轨迹跟踪。文中涵盖了从系统建模、控制器设计到仿真验证的完整流程,突出了全驱动结构相较于传统四旋翼在欠驱动问题上的优势。; 适合人群:具备一定控制理论基础和Matlab/Simulink使用经验的自动化、航空航天及相关专业的研究生、科研人员或无人机开发工程师。; 使用场景及目标:①学习全驱动四旋翼无人机的动力学建模方法;②掌握基于Matlab/Simulink的无人机控制系统设计与仿真技术;③深入理解螺旋桨倾斜机构对飞行性能的影响及其控制实现;④为相关课题研究或工程开发提供可复现的技术参考与代码支持。; 阅读建议:建议读者结合提供的Matlab代码与Simulink模型,逐步跟进文档中的建模与控制设计步骤,动手实践仿真过程,以加深对全驱动无人机控制原理的理解,并可根据实际需求对模型与控制器进行修改与优化。
评论 1
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值