Programming Languages Comparision

最新推荐文章于 2025-12-19 15:39:34 发布

原创最新推荐文章于 2025-12-19 15:39:34 发布 · 1.2k 阅读

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

文章标签：

#pascal #java #smalltalk #scala #haskell #fortran

The latest computer language benchmarks from
http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=all

[Note: Java 6.04, SML-Mlton, Ocaml, D 已经有了不错的性能上的提升了。]

Computer Language Benchmarks Game

Create your own Ranking

What fun! Can you manipulate the multipliers and weights to make your favourite language the best programming language in the Benchmarks Game?

x	language	mean	-
1.0	C++ GNU g++	1.20	2
1.1	C GNU gcc	1.35	2
1.2	D Digital Mars	1.41	2
1.2	Clean	1.48	3
1.3	Pascal Free Pascal	1.52	2
1.5	Oberon-2 OO2C	1.75	7
1.5	Haskell GHC	1.78	1
1.6	Eiffel SmartEiffel	1.89	3
1.7	SML MLton	2.06	4
1.8	OCaml	2.11	3
1.8	Lisp SBCL	2.11	3
1.8	BASIC FreeBASIC	2.17	2
1.8	Java 6 -server	2.19	1
2.0	Ada 2005 GNAT	2.37	2
2.0	Scala	2.46	1
2.4	C# Mono	2.88	2
2.4	CAL	2.94	1
2.7	Nice	3.24	1
3.0	Forth bigForth	3.66	3
3.2	Fortran G95	3.87	6
5.7	Erlang HiPE	6.85	1
9.0	Smalltalk VisualWorks	10.86	1
9.3	Scheme MzScheme	11.20	7
12	Lua	14.90	3
14	Mozart/Oz	17.11	2
17	Pike	20.82	4
18	Python	21.07	1
20	Perl	24.15	3
23	PHP	27.12	3
47	Tcl	56.24	3
49	JavaScript SpiderMonkey	59.33	6
54	Ruby	65.41	2
65	Prolog SWI	77.69	9

multipliers

Full CPU Time
Memory Use
GZip Bytes
benchmark	weight
binary-trees
chameneos-redux (new)
fannkuch
fasta
k-nucleotide
mandelbrot
meteor-contest
n-body
nsieve
nsieve-bits
partial-sums
pidigits
recursive
regex-dna
reverse-complement
spectral-norm
startup
sum-file
thread-ring (new)

about the Ranking

(Language implementations with more than a couple of Timeouts distort the ranking - so they have been excluded. They can still be compared directly against another language implementation.)

For each benchmark, the best measurement B is the lowest non-zero measurement. For each language implementation, the measurement L for the language implementation is converted to the ratio L/B

The ratio can be adjusted by a measurement multiplier (make CPU time or memory use or lines-of-code more or less important) and by a benchmark weight (make particular benchmarks more or less important).

For each language implementation, we report the Weighted Geometric Mean of those L/B ratios.

Java VS C# mono：

Compare the performance of Java 6 -server programs against some other language implementation, or check the Java CPU time and Memory use measurements.

For more information about the Java implementation we measured see ↓ about Java 6 -server.

Compare to:

Are the Java 6 -server programs better?

For each of one our benchmarks, a white bar shows which language implementation had the faster program, and a black bar shows which used the least memory.

How many times better?

How many times faster or smaller are the Java 6 -server programs than the corresponding C# Mono programs?

Java 6 -server x times better ~ C# Mono x times better
Program & Logs	Faster	Smaller: Memory Use	Smaller: GZip Bytes	Reduced N
binary-trees	1.2	~1.6	1.0
chameneos-redux (new)	No program
fannkuch	1.6	~1.9	~1.4
fasta	1.2	~2.2	~1.1
k-nucleotide	1.1	1.1	~1.0
mandelbrot	2.2	~2.2	~1.3
meteor-contest			No Mono
n-body	1.8	~2.2	~1.0
nsieve	~1.0	~1.5	~1.3
nsieve-bits	1.1	~1.7	~1.4
partial-sums	~1.6	~2.4	~1.0
pidigits	~1.1	~2.0	1.1
recursive	1.1	~2.2	1.0
regex-dna	2.4	2.4	~1.1
reverse-complement	~1.2	~2.0	~1.2
spectral-norm	1.9	~2.6	~1.1
startup	~2.0		1.1
sum-file	2.3	~2.3	~1.1
thread-ring (new)	1.3	~2.1	~1.1