Thought Share - How to write a useful design document

本文探讨了软件设计文档的重要性及其实用性。通过对比传统CMM倡导的全面文档化与敏捷开发中对设计文档的质疑,作者提出了一种实用主义的观点。认为设计文档应该作为业务解决方案与代码实现之间的桥梁,并强调了其在架构描述、接口定义等方面的作用。
How to write design document? Are you kidding? After all we have had many years experience in design document.



These days I have done some design work for Automatic Claim Handling and Letter.

I reviewed previous design documents and kept thinking what should be putted into the document and what should not.

Actually, I am not alone in this issue. In software community, it’s always a hot controversial topic. Extremely there are two distinct voices.



1. CMM advocators insist on tons of documents including comprehensive design document

2. Some Agile advocators speak out design document is useless and design is dead



Eventually, I find myself at the center of this argument. I am not 空头, I am not 多头,I want to be “滑头”, I always want to be pragmatic.

So what’s a design document for?

Basically it acts as a bridge between business solution and code implementation. Dose the document stuff really help it?

Where the answer is yes, I intend to move forward, where the answer is no, action will end.



Let’s have a look at the advantage and disadvantage of design document.



Advantage:

1. It’s good at describe the whole architecture in high level and lead in a right direction

2. It’s vivid and expressive with many diagram, notation and easy to communicate

3. In interface design, it can be a deliverable contract with outer system



Disadvantage:

1. It’s incline to be out of date

First, it's hard to think through all the issues that you need to deal with when you are programming.

Even we can carry it out with extra effort, it’s impossible even for the most experienced designer to foresee requirement change.

2. It’s hard to verify automatically comparing with unit test

Although UML diagram and notation can decrease the ambiguous, it’s still mainly for human-beings. Document is hard to be synchronized with the implementation.



So my principle is to adopt the strength and avoid the weakness.

1. It can never be too detailed for interface contract design document

2. Design document should clarify the boundary with outer system

3. Design document should express high level concern and main point of business solution

4. Design document should setup common convention and pattern.

5. Design document should not run into implementation detail.

6. Unit test should be involved to help to reflect requirement and design.



Remember, it is better to have few useful design documents that you use and keep up to date than to have many forgotten, obsolete documents.
**项目名称:** 基于Vue.js与Spring Cloud架构的博客系统设计与开发——微服务分布式应用实践 **项目概述:** 本项目为计算机科学与技术专业本科毕业设计成果,旨在设计并实现一个采用前后端分离架构的现代化博客平台。系统前端基于Vue.js框架构建,提供响应式用户界面;后端采用Spring Cloud微服务架构,通过服务拆分、注册发现、配置中心及网关路由等技术,构建高可用、易扩展的分布式应用体系。项目重点探讨微服务模式下的系统设计、服务治理、数据一致性及部署运维等关键问题,体现了分布式系统在Web应用中的实践价值。 **技术架构:** 1. **前端技术栈:** Vue.js 2.x、Vue Router、Vuex、Element UI、Axios 2. **后端技术栈:** Spring Boot 2.x、Spring Cloud (Eureka/Nacos、Feign/OpenFeign、Ribbon、Hystrix、Zuul/Gateway、Config) 3. **数据存储:** MySQL 8.0(主数据存储)、Redis(缓存与会话管理) 4. **服务通信:** RESTful API、消息队列(可选RabbitMQ/Kafka) 5. **部署与运维:** Docker容器化、Jenkins持续集成、Nginx负载均衡 **核心功能模块:** - 用户管理:注册登录、权限控制、个人中心 - 文章管理:富文本编辑、分类标签、发布审核、评论互动 - 内容展示:首页推荐、分类检索、全文搜索、热门排行 - 系统管理:后台仪表盘、用户与内容监控、日志审计 - 微服务治理:服务健康检测、动态配置更新、熔断降级策略 **设计特点:** 1. **架构解耦:** 前后端完全分离,通过API网关统一接入,支持独立开发与部署。 2. **服务拆分:** 按业务域划分为用户服务、文章服务、评论服务、文件服务等独立微服务。 3. **高可用设计:** 采用服务注册发现机制,配合负载均衡与熔断器,提升系统容错能力。 4. **可扩展性:** 模块化设计支持横向扩展,配置中心实现运行时动态调整。 **项目成果:** 完成了一个具备完整博客功能、具备微服务典型特征的分布式系统原型,通过容器化部署验证了多服务协同运行的可行性,为云原生应用开发提供了实践参考。 资源来源于网络分享,仅用于学习交流使用,请勿用于商业,如有侵权请联系我删除!
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值