SQL Server has encountered 1 occurrence(s) of I/O requests taking longer tha

本文讨论了 SQL Server 在 O:logsDATABASE.ldf 文件上遇到 I/O 请求超过 15 秒的问题。通过社区专家的帮助,最终确定问题是由于网络故障导致。文章还提供了排查 I/O 性能问题的方法。



 	
SQLServerCentral Register

Home»SQL Server 2014»Administration - SQL Server 2014»SQL Server has encountered 1 occurrence(s) of...
SQL Server has encountered 1 occurrence(s) of I/O requests taking longer than 15 seconds

Post reply Like 315  Add to Briefcase 12Next 
SQL Server has encountered 1 occurrence(s) of I/O requests taking longer than 15 seconds ViewOptions
Author	Message
arrjay	Posted 4 years ago #1633869
arrjay SSCrazy
SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)
Group: General Forum Members
Points: 2319 Visits: 600
Hi there - Last night our application experienced a brief outage due to the following error which I found in the error logs; 

SQL Server has encountered 1 occurrence(s) of I/O requests taking longer than 15 seconds to complete on file [O:\logs\DATABASE.ldf] in database [DATABASE] (12). The OS file handle is 0x0000000000000D58. The offset of the latest long I/O is: 0x00000013f80000

Does anyone have any idea what this means? And what may have caused it? Thanks 

--------------------------------------------

Laughing in the face of contention...
 38
Quote
Jack Corbett	Posted 4 years ago #1633909
  Jack Corbett SSC Guru
SSC Guru (126K reputation)SSC Guru (126K reputation)SSC Guru (126K reputation)SSC Guru (126K reputation)SSC Guru (126K reputation)SSC Guru (126K reputation)SSC Guru (126K reputation)SSC Guru (126K reputation)
Group: General Forum Members
Points: 126284 Visits: 15068
It means you probably have an issue somewhere in your storage subsystem. Either disk issues or you somehow saturated it, which is a problem as well.

You can learn more about it here, http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2137408 


Jack Corbett 
Consultant Straight Path Solutions 
Dont let the good be the enemy of the best. -- Paul Fleming
At best you can say that one job may be more secure than another, but total job security is an illusion. -- Rod at work
Check out these links on how to get faster and more accurate answers: 
Forum Etiquette: How to post data/code on a forum to get the best help
Need an Answer? Actually, No ... You Need a QuestionHow to Post Performance Problems
Crosstabs and Pivots or How to turn rows into columns Part 1
Crosstabs and Pivots or How to turn rows into columns Part 2
 45
Quote
Summer90	Posted 4 years ago #1634573
Summer90 SSC-Insane
SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)
Group: General Forum Members
Points: 21333 Visits: 4110
Is there any disk scans, defrags, Anti Virus software running? This could cause it as well.

The message means that SQL Server sent a request to your storage for data and it took more than 15 seconds to return the results... it should be less than 15 milliseconds.

I have battled these in the past and it is VERY difficult to determine the cause. I even had Microsoft looking into this and all they came back with is saying it is your storage. For one incident of this we DID find it was the storage. Other times we never determined the cause. 
 29
Quote
Jeff Moden	Posted 4 years ago #1634700
Jeff Moden SSC Guru
SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)
Group: General Forum Members
Points: 627097 Visits: 45308
Part of the reason why this problem is so difficult to nail down is because, in my humble opinion, people don't look in the right spot. Instead, they go through the throws of proving the disk system doesn't actually have a problem and that there's usually nothing (such as defrags, backup exec, etc, etc) that's the problem. That's because the error message is really just a symptom of a more insidious problem than hardware or the normal things that you would expect SQL Server to do.

This isn't a rare problem, either. I've found this problem on virtually every system that I've been assigned to work on and few are willing to fix the real cause because it's "too expensive". So they throw more hardware at it and the problem might go away for awhile but it almost always comes back to haunt you because you haven't fixed the real cause of the problem.

How can you find the real cause?

Open SSMS and, if it isn't already open, open the "explorer" by pressing the {f8} key. Right click on the instance and select {Reports}, {Standard Reports}, {Performance - Top Queries by Total I/O}. That will show you the top 10 problems that are the usual cause of this problem. You need to bite the bullet and fix those problems. Once you fix those, fix the next 10 and then the 10 after that (although the first 10 will usually give you the biggest bang for the buck).

After that, you can probably disconnect the garden hose from the CPU cooling and turn off the industrial fan you're using to cool the SAN and the apps will start running just fine with no more such outages. 

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced ree-bar and is a Modenism for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code: 
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column.
If you think its expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. -- Red Adair 

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to post performance problems
Forum FAQs
 16
Quote
Summer90	Posted 4 years ago #1634704
Summer90 SSC-Insane
SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)SSC-Insane (21K reputation)
Group: General Forum Members
Points: 21333 Visits: 4110
Jeff Moden (11/14/2014)
Part of the reason why this problem is so difficult to nail down is because, in my humble opinion, people don't look in the right spot. Instead, they go through the throws of proving the disk system doesn't actually have a problem and that there's usually nothing (such as defrags, backup exec, etc, etc) that's the problem. That's because the error message is really just a symptom of a more insidious problem than hardware or the normal things that you would expect SQL Server to do.

This isn't a rare problem, either. I've found this problem on virtually every system that I've been assigned to work on and few are willing to fix the real cause because it's "too expensive". So they throw more hardware at it and the problem might go away for awhile but it almost always comes back to haunt you because you haven't fixed the real cause of the problem.

How can you find the real cause?

Open SSMS and, if it isn't already open, open the "explorer" by pressing the {f8} key. Right click on the instance and select {Reports}, {Standard Reports}, {Performance - Top Queries by Total I/O}. That will show you the top 10 problems that are the usual cause of this problem. You need to bite the bullet and fix those problems. Once you fix those, fix the next 10 and then the 10 after that (although the first 10 will usually give you the biggest bang for the buck).

After that, you can probably disconnect the garden hose from the CPU cooling and turn off the industrial fan you're using to cool the SAN and the apps will start running just fine with no more such outages.


The latest one that is causing us to see slow I/Os is only a distribution sql server. I have no control over how Microsoft has setup replication 
 29
Quote
Jeff Moden	Posted 4 years ago #1634717
Jeff Moden SSC Guru
SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)SSC Guru (627K reputation)
Group: General Forum Members
Points: 627097 Visits: 45308
Understood and appreciated. There are sometimes those problems. Just to be sure, though, none of the systems that I've encountered this on had replication or anything similar running. 

--Jeff Moden

RBAR is pronounced ree-bar and is a Modenism for Row-By-Agonizing-Row.
First step towards the paradigm shift of writing Set Based code: 
Stop thinking about what you want to do to a row... think, instead, of what you want to do to a column.
If you think its expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. -- Red Adair 

Helpful Links:
How to post code problems
How to post performance problems
Forum FAQs
 32
Quote
Perry Whittle	Posted 4 years ago #1634772
Perry Whittle SSC Guru
SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)
Group: General Forum Members
Points: 170792 Visits: 18516
SQL server doesn't tell porky pies, when you get this message it's because an I\O request has taken longer than 15ms. Common with SAN attached disks is storage saturation, but you wont generally see this at the array, level that may be showing no issues. Don't forget an I\O on a SAN has to traverse all the FC switches to the storage processor and then come back. When the request leaves the SP it could take forever due to network flooding. A FC network is similar to a TCP\IP network in that a large number of requests active on the network can cause response issues. 

One thing to check is the queue depth length on the HBAs, if its too high it could cause issues. 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" ;-)
 33
Quote
SQL_Baby	Posted 4 years ago #1635529
SQL_Baby SSChasing Mays
SSChasing Mays (639 reputation)SSChasing Mays (639 reputation)SSChasing Mays (639 reputation)SSChasing Mays (639 reputation)SSChasing Mays (639 reputation)SSChasing Mays (639 reputation)SSChasing Mays (639 reputation)SSChasing Mays (639 reputation)
Group: General Forum Members
Points: 639 Visits: 181
Hi,

What some of the other guys here have mentioned are very valid as it could be so many issues. Here's a few extra things to check.

Is your server a VM? Then check your underlying disk subsystem to see whether any other servers are sharing with it. It could be these are very busy and overloading the underlying disk.

It could be a basic configuration issue. On your first post you mentioned Log file. How big is it? Is there many VLFs? Do all your Data and Log files reside on the same disk? What is the RAID level on the disk? 

At the time of the alerts are there any DBCCs or index rebuilds running? 

Regarding the replicated server, if you could describe the setup maybe I can give you some pointers as to what to check there. i.e is it both Publisher and Distributor. How many Subscribers and are they Pull or Push Subscription? What type of Replication is it? Are you getting the Alerts on the Distribution database or the Published database?

Hope this helps... 
 27
Quote
arrjay	Posted 4 years ago #1636698
arrjay SSCrazy
SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)SSCrazy (2.3K reputation)
Group: General Forum Members
Points: 2319 Visits: 600
Hi there - thanks to everyone for their input on this. 

After numerous calls with our hosting partners I can confirm that it was in fact a problem with our network. 

As our database is highly transactional and does not contain any high I/O bound queries therefore I knew it was an issue with the subsystem. We performed several tests on the disk and found that it was performing as expected. We then monitgored the time it took for information to be pass between SQL and the disk, we then found that the network was faulty and not handling the requests as expected, so we changed the network to a higher tunnel link

Thanks again. 

--------------------------------------------

Laughing in the face of contention...
 37
Quote
Perry Whittle	Posted 4 years ago #1636726
Perry Whittle SSC Guru
SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)SSC Guru (170K reputation)
Group: General Forum Members
Points: 170792 Visits: 18516
arrjay (11/20/2014)
We performed several tests on the disk and found that it was performing as expected. We then monitgored the time it took for information to be pass between SQL and the disk, we then found that the network was faulty and not handling the requests as expected, so we changed the network to a higher tunnel link

Classic case scenario, thanks for posting back 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Ya can't make an omelette without breaking just a few eggs" ;-)
 16
Quote
  Go

Post reply Like 315  Add to Briefcase 12Next 

Permissions
You can't post new topics.
You can't post topic replies.
You can't post new polls.
You can't post replies to polls.
You can't edit your own topics.
You can't delete your own topics.
You can't edit other topics.
You can't delete other topics.
You can't edit your own posts.
You can't edit other posts.
You can't delete your own posts.
You can't delete other posts.
You can't post events.
You can't edit your own events.
You can't edit other events.	You can't delete your own events.
You can't delete other events.
You can't send private messages.
You can't send emails.
You can read topics.
You can't vote in polls.
You can't upload attachments.
You can download attachments.
You can't post HTML code.
You can't edit HTML code.
You can't post IFCode.
You can't post JavaScript.
You can post emoticons.
You can't post or upload images.

Powered by InstantForum 2016-2 Final © 2018
Execution: 0.000. 2 queries. Compression enabled. SQLServerCentral
Register Search

Search discussions

 
 	
Copyright © 2002-2018 Redgate. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy. Terms of Use. Report Abuse.
 

<think>好的,用户现在的问题是关于SQLServer中I/O请求超过15秒的解决方案。首先,我需要理解用户的具体情况。用户遇到了I/O请求超时的问题,尤其是在文件操作上,这可能涉及到磁盘性能、SQL Server配置或者查询优化等方面。接下来,我需要回顾之前提供的引用内容,看看是否有相关的信息可以应用。引用3提到了通过检查PAGEIOLATCH类型的等待统计来识别I/O瓶颈,这可能是一个关键点。用户可能需要检查这些等待类型,确定是否确实存在I/O延迟的问题。此外,引用4提到了磁盘空间不足可能导致的问题,这也是需要检查的一个方面。然后,我需要考虑常见的解决方案。首先,检查磁盘性能是基础,包括磁盘的读写速度、是否存在硬件故障或者资源争用。建议用户使用性能监视器(PerfMon)监控磁盘的指标,比如Avg.Disk sec/Read和Avg. Disksec/Write,确保这些值在合理范围内。如果磁盘响应时间过长,可能需要升级存储设备,比如使用SSD或者更快的磁盘阵列。接下来是SQL Server的配置优化。例如,检查数据文件和日志文件是否分开存储在不同的物理磁盘上,以减少I/O争用。此外,调整恢复模式,如果数据库使用的是完整恢复模式,频繁的日志备份可能导致大量的日志写入,可以考虑调整为简单恢复模式,但需注意这会影响恢复能力。同时,检查自动增长设置,避免因文件自动增长导致的I/O突发,建议预先手动调整文件大小。然后,查询优化也是一个重要方面。效率低下的查询可能导致大量的物理I/O,使用执行计划分析工具找出高I/O消耗的查询,并优化索引,比如添加缺失的索引或重建碎片化的索引。此外,减少全表扫描,通过优化WHERE子句或使用覆盖索引来降低I/O压力。 另外,检查是否有锁竞争或阻塞的情况,因为长时间的阻塞可能导致I/O请求堆积。使用DMV查询sys.dm_os_wait_stats和sys.dm_exec_requests来识别高等待时间的会话,并分析阻塞的原因。 还需要考虑内存配置。如果缓冲池不足,可能导致更多的物理I/O。确保maxservermemory设置合理,避免SQLServer内存不足而频繁进行磁盘交换。同时,检查内存授予等待(MemoryGrants Pending),如果存在大量等待,可能需要调整资源调控器或优化查询的内存使用。最后,系统层面的优化,比如确保磁盘驱动程序和固件是最新的,检查防病毒软件是否排除了SQLServer的数据文件和日志目录,避免不必要的扫描影响I/O性能。如果使用的是SAN存储,调整LUN的队列深度和缓存策略,可能也会有帮助。在生成相关问题的时候,需要围绕用户的问题展开,比如如何监控I/O瓶颈、优化SQLServer配置、查询优化方法、内存与I/O的关系,以及硬件升级建议等,这样用户可以根据自己的情况进一步探索解决方案。</think>### SQL Server I/O请求超时(超过15秒)解决方案 #### 1. 诊断I/O瓶颈根源 - **检查磁盘性能指标** 使用性能监视器(PerfMon)监控以下计数器: - `PhysicalDisk\Avg. Disk sec/Read`(读延迟) - `PhysicalDisk\Avg. Disk sec/Write`(写延迟) 若值持续超过20毫秒,表明存储子系统存在瓶颈[^3]。 - **分析I/O等待类型** 通过DMV查询I/O相关的等待统计: ```sql SELECT wait_type, waiting_tasks_count, wait_time_ms FROM sys.dm_os_wait_stats WHERE wait_type LIKE 'PAGEIOLATCH%' ORDER BY wait_time_ms DESC; ``` 若`PAGEIOLATCH_EX`或`PAGEIOLATCH_SH`的等待时间占比高,说明物理I/O请求延迟严重[^3]。 #### 2. 优化存储配置 - **分离数据与日志文件** 将数据文件(`.mdf`/`.ndf`)和日志文件(`.ldf`)部署到**独立物理磁盘**,避免I/O争用。 - **调整文件自动增长设置** 避免频繁的小幅度增长(如默认的1MB),建议设置为合理值(如512MB),并预先手动扩展文件大小[^4]。 - **检查磁盘空间可用性** 确保数据库文件和备份目录的剩余空间至少为当前数据量的20%,避免空间不足导致I/O挂起[^4]。 #### 3. 优化查询与索引 - **识别高I/O消耗查询** 使用以下查询定位TOP I/O查询: ```sql SELECT TOP 10 qs.total_logical_reads + qs.total_logical_writes AS total_io, qs.execution_count, SUBSTRING(qt.text, (qs.statement_start_offset/2)+1, ((CASE qs.statement_end_offset WHEN -1 THEN DATALENGTH(qt.text) ELSE qs.statement_end_offset END - qs.statement_start_offset)/2)+1) AS query_text FROM sys.dm_exec_query_stats qs CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_sql_text(qs.sql_handle) qt ORDER BY total_io DESC; ``` - **添加缺失索引** 通过`Database Engine Tuning Advisor`或缺失索引DMV(如`sys.dm_db_missing_index_details`)创建覆盖索引,减少全表扫描。 #### 4. 调整内存配置 - **扩大缓冲池(Buffer Pool)** 确保`max server memory`未过度限制,保留足够内存给操作系统: $$ \text{推荐值} = \text{总物理内存} - (\text{其他进程内存} + 4\text{GB}) $$ - **监控内存授予等待** 若`Memory Grants Pending`计数器持续大于0,需优化内存密集型查询或增加内存资源[^1]。 #### 5. 硬件与驱动优化 - **升级存储设备** 将机械硬盘(HDD)替换为SSD,或使用SAN存储配置条带化(RAID 10)提升吞吐量。 - **更新磁盘控制器驱动** 确保存储控制器的驱动程序与固件为最新版本,避免已知I/O调度缺陷。 #### 6. 应急处理措施 - **禁用即时文件初始化(IFI)** 若日志文件写入延迟高,在服务账户权限中取消`SE_MANAGE_VOLUME_NAME`特权(需权衡数据安全性)。 - **临时启用跟踪标志1117/1118** 对于旧版本SQL Server,使用以下命令缓解TempDB争用: ```sql DBCC TRACEON(1117, 1118, -1); ``` ---
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值