TCP Starvation

本文探讨了TCP和UDP在网络拥堵期间的行为差异。TCP通过慢启动机制减少带宽使用,而UDP则可能占据TCP放弃的带宽,导致TCP饥饿现象。理解这种行为对于混合使用两种传输层协议的应用至关重要。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

TCP incorporates mechanisms for reliability, flow control, and congestion avoidance. However, UDP is a lightweight protocol for faster and simpler data transmissions and does not include these features.
When there is a combination of TCP and UDP flows during a period of congestion, TCP tries to do its part by backing off on bandwidth called slow start. However, UDP with-out any flow control mechanisms continues, potentially using up the available bandwidth given up by TCP. This is known as TCP starvation/UDP dominance
It is not always possible to separate TCP- and UDP-based flows, but it is important to be aware of this behavior when mixing applications that use both transport layer protocols.

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值