Difference Between RPC and Document

本文深入探讨了Web Services中使用的两种主要术语:RPC与文档样式,并详细解释了它们在Web Services Description Language (WSDL)文档中的应用。文章重点比较了这两种绑定风格之间的关键差异,包括消息传递方式、结构耦合性、参数传递方法以及操作名称的保留情况。同时,介绍了四种可能的组合方式,并阐述了每种组合的特点。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

 

RPC vs Document

RPC and document style Web Services Description Language are the two most widely used terms in reference to Web services and SOAP protocol. The web services are often described using Web Services Description Language (WSDL) documents. The WSDL outlines the supported Web service operations and messages and binds them to a concrete network protocol and message format. The abstract definitions are defined using “type,” “message,” and “portType” elements. The concrete specifications are described using “binding” and “service” elements. Each of these elements are placed inside a “definitions” element.

RPC and document style differ in their binding styles which are also referred to as SOAP binding styles.The WSDL specifies the binding style as RPC or document depending on the SOAP payload or the structure of the element contents. The document style is always the default choice as the SOAP message is sent as a single “document” in the element. The RPC style element has to follow the rules described by the SOAP specification. As per the rules, the may consist of only one element which is named after the operation, and the parameters are interpreted as sub-elements of the main element. Both RPC and document styles are accepted versions by most of the SOAP clients; however, the use of one over the other is mainly one’s personal choice.

The use attribute also helps to distinguish between RPC and document styles. The use attribute describes how both the styles are represented in XML. The use attribute describes whether the message parts are encoded or the message follows an XML schema definition. Based on choices, there are four possible combinations of both RPC and document styles; viz RPC/encoded, RPC literal, Document/Encoded or Document/Literal. Not all of the four combinations are in use, and the preference of one combination over the other is more of a personal interest.

The main difference between document and RPC styles is that, in the document style, the client always sends the service parameters to the server in a simple XML document format rather than a discrete set of parameter values. The document style is loosely coupled as compared to the RPC style.

In the Document/Literal style, the message can always be validated using any XML validator. The content within the SOAP body is clearly defined in the schema. In the RPC/literal style, the transferred data is difficult to validate by the SOAP message.The Document/Literal style loses the operation name in the SOAP message whereas in the RPC/literal style the operation name still exists in the SOAP message.Out of four different combinations, the styles that are widely used are RPC/literal and Document/Literal.

Summary:

1. In document style, the SOAP message is sent as a single document whereas in the RPC style, the SOAP body may contain several elements.

2. The document style is loosely coupled whereas the RPC is tightly coupled.

3. In the document style, the client sends the service parameters in simple XML format whereas in the RPC style the parameters are sent as discrete of values.

4. The Document/Literal style loses the operation name in the SOAP message whereas the RPC/literal style keeps the operation name in the SOAP message.

5. In the Document/Literal style, messages can always be validated using any XML validator whereas in the RPC/literal style, the transferred data is difficult to validate by the SOAP message.

 

内容概要:本文深入解析了扣子COZE AI编程及其详细应用代码案例,旨在帮助读者理解新一代低门槛智能体开发范式。文章从五个维度展开:关键概念、核心技巧、典型应用场景、详细代码案例分析以及未来发展趋势。首先介绍了扣子COZE的核心概念,如Bot、Workflow、Plugin、Memory和Knowledge。接着分享了意图识别、函数调用链、动态Prompt、渐进式发布及监控可观测等核心技巧。然后列举了企业内部智能客服、电商导购助手、教育领域AI助教和金融行业合规质检等应用场景。最后,通过构建“会议纪要智能助手”的详细代码案例,展示了从需求描述、技术方案、Workflow节点拆解到调试与上线的全过程,并展望了多智能体协作、本地私有部署、Agent2Agent协议、边缘计算插件和实时RAG等未来发展方向。; 适合人群:对AI编程感兴趣的开发者,尤其是希望快速落地AI产品的技术人员。; 使用场景及目标:①学习如何使用扣子COZE构建生产级智能体;②掌握智能体实例、自动化流程、扩展能力和知识库的使用方法;③通过实际案例理解如何实现会议纪要智能助手的功能,包括触发器设置、下载节点、LLM节点Prompt设计、Code节点处理和邮件节点配置。; 阅读建议:本文不仅提供了理论知识,还包含了详细的代码案例,建议读者结合实际业务需求进行实践,逐步掌握扣子COZE的各项功能,并关注其未来的发展趋势。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值