sychronized和Lock有什么区别?用的新的Lock有什么好处?你举例说说
-
原始构成
sychronized是关键字属于JVM层面
Monitorenter(底层是通过monitor对象来完成,其实wait/notify等方法也依赖于monitor对象只有在同步块或者方法中才能调用wait/notify等方法)
Monitorexit
Lock是具体的类(java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock)是API层面的锁
-
使用的方法
Synchronized 不需要用户去手动释放锁,当sychronized代码执行完后系统会自动让线程释放对锁的占用
ReentrantLock则需要用户去手动释放锁若没有主动释放锁,就有可能出现死锁现象。
需要lock() 和unclock() 方法配合try/finally语句来完成
-
等待是否可中断
sychronized不可中断,除非抛出异常或者正常运行完成
ReentrantLock可中断, 1.设置超时方法 tryLock(long timeout,TimeUnit unit)
2. lockInterruptibly()放代码块中,调用interrupt()方法可中断
-
加锁是否公平
Sychronized 非公平锁
ReentrantLock两者都可以,默认非公平锁,构造方法可以传入blooean值,true为公平锁,false为非公平锁
-
锁绑定多个条件condition
sychronized没有
ReentrantLock用来实现分组唤醒需要唤醒的线程们,可以精确唤醒,而不是像synchronized要么随机唤醒一个线程要么唤醒全部线程。
锁绑定多个条件Condition
class ShareResource{
public volatile int number=1;
private final Lock lock = new ReentrantLock();
private final Condition c1 = lock.newCondition();
private final Condition c2 = lock.newCondition();
private final Condition c3 = lock.newCondition();
public void print(int number, int printNumber){
Condition condition;
lock.lock();
try{
if (number == 1){
condition = c1;
}else if (number == 2){
condition = c2;
}else{
condition = c3;
}
while (number != this.number) {
condition.await();
}
for (int i = 0; i < printNumber; i++) {
System.out.println(Thread.currentThread().getName()+" "+(i+1));
}
condition.signal();
}catch (Exception ignored){
}finally {
lock.unlock();
}
}
}
public class ConditionDemo {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ShareResource shareResource = new ShareResource();
new Thread(()->{
shareResource.number = 1;
shareResource.print(1,5);
},"AA").start();
new Thread(()->{
shareResource.number = 2;
shareResource.print(2,10);
},"BB").start();
new Thread(()->{
shareResource.number = 3;
shareResource.print(3,15);
},"CC").start();
}
}