J2EE vs. Microsoft.NET
A comparison of building XML-based web services
By Chad Vawter and Ed Roman June 2001
I. Preface
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this whitepaper, we will make a powerful comparison between the two choices that businesses have for building XML-based web services: the Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE)1 , built by Sun Microsystems and other industry players, and Microsoft.NET2, built by Microsoft Corporation.
Some of the statements we make will offend you, and hopefully more of them will agree with you. So as you read this paper, please remember our three promises:
We promise to compare these choices at a logical, neutral, and unbiased level.
We promise to tell the tale about how we really do feel about these technologies.
We promise to dispel the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) that exists in the marketplace today.
Although both J2EE and .NET cover a great deal of technologies and standards, we will focus specifically on building server-side systems as web services using these architectures (for example, we will not be mentioning Jini or Office XP). After reading this white paper, you will have a solid understanding of how these architectures compare, and be empowered to make intelligent decisions in new web services initiatives.
The first half of this whitepaper is background information about web services, J2EE, and .NET. If you already understand these technologies, feel free to skip ahead to the 2nd half of the paper, which is the juicy comparison.
A comparison of building XML-based web services
By Chad Vawter and Ed Roman June 2001
I. Preface
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this whitepaper, we will make a powerful comparison between the two choices that businesses have for building XML-based web services: the Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE)1 , built by Sun Microsystems and other industry players, and Microsoft.NET2, built by Microsoft Corporation.
Some of the statements we make will offend you, and hopefully more of them will agree with you. So as you read this paper, please remember our three promises:
We promise to compare these choices at a logical, neutral, and unbiased level.
We promise to tell the tale about how we really do feel about these technologies.
We promise to dispel the Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt (FUD) that exists in the marketplace today.
Although both J2EE and .NET cover a great deal of technologies and standards, we will focus specifically on building server-side systems as web services using these architectures (for example, we will not be mentioning Jini or Office XP). After reading this white paper, you will have a solid understanding of how these architectures compare, and be empowered to make intelligent decisions in new web services initiatives.
The first half of this whitepaper is background information about web services, J2EE, and .NET. If you already understand these technologies, feel free to skip ahead to the 2nd half of the paper, which is the juicy comparison.
本文对企业构建基于XML的Web服务的两种选择——J2EE和Microsoft.NET进行了对比。承诺以中立、无偏的态度比较,讲述对技术的真实感受,消除市场疑虑。聚焦于用这两种架构构建服务器端系统,前半部分是相关背景信息,后半部分是具体对比。
975

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



