[转]NoSQL比较：Cassandra vs MongoDB vs CouchDB vs Redis vs Riak vs HBase vs Membase

数据库比较：CouchDB, Redis, MongoDB, Riak, Membase, Neo4j, Cassandra, HBase

最新推荐文章于 2018-10-16 23:55:56 发布

原创最新推荐文章于 2018-10-16 23:55:56 发布 · 197 阅读

0 ·

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

文章标签：

#NoSQL

NoSQL 专栏收录该内容

4 篇文章

订阅专栏

本文对比了CouchDB、Redis、MongoDB、Riak、Membase、Neo4j、Cassandra和HBase等数据库的特点，包括一致性、易用性、协议、主要特点、许可证类型、最佳使用场景和实例应用。

CouchDB

Written in: Erlang
Main point: DB consistency, ease of use
License: Apache
Protocol: HTTP/REST
Bi-directional (!) replication,
continuous or ad-hoc,
with conflict detection,
thus, master-master replication. (!)
MVCC - write operations do not block reads
Previous versions of documents are available
Crash-only (reliable) design
Needs compacting from time to time
Views: embedded map/reduce
Formatting views: lists & shows
Server-side document validation possible
Authentication possible
Real-time updates via _changes (!)
Attachment handling
thus, CouchApps (standalone js apps)
jQuery library included

Best used: For accumulating, occasionally changing data, on which pre-defined queries are to be run. Places where versioning is important.

For example: CRM, CMS systems. Master-master replication is an especially interesting feature, allowing easy multi-site deployments.

Redis

Written in: C/C++
Main point: Blazing fast
License: BSD
Protocol: Telnet-like
Disk-backed in-memory database,
but since 2.0, it can swap to disk. (Going away after 2.4!)
Master-slave replication
Simple values or hash tables by keys,
but complex operations like ZREVRANGEBYSCORE.
INCR & co (good for rate limiting or statistics)
Has sets (also union/diff/inter)
Has lists (also a queue; blocking pop)
Has hashes (objects of multiple fields)
Sorted sets (high score table, good for range queries)
Redis has transactions (!)
Values can be set to expire (as in a cache)
Pub/Sub lets one implement messaging (!)

Best used: For rapidly changing data with a foreseeable database size (should fit mostly in memory).

For example: Stock prices. Analytics. Real-time data collection. Real-time communication.

MongoDB

Written in: C++
Main point: Retains some friendly properties of SQL. (Query, index)
License: AGPL (Drivers: Apache)
Protocol: Custom, binary (BSON)
Master/slave replication (auto failover with replica sets)
Sharding built-in
Queries are javascript expressions
Run arbitrary javascript functions server-side
Better update-in-place than CouchDB
Uses memory mapped files for data storage
Performance over features
Journaling (with --journal) is best turned on
On 32bit systems, limited to ~2.5Gb
An empty database takes up 192Mb
GridFS to store big data + metadata (not actually an FS)

Best used: If you need dynamic queries. If you prefer to define indexes, not map/reduce functions. If you need good performance on a big DB. If you wanted CouchDB, but your data changes too much, filling up disks.

For example: For most things that you would do with MySQL or PostgreSQL, but having predefined columns really holds you back.

Riak

Written in: Erlang & C, some Javascript
Main point: Fault tolerance
License: Apache
Protocol: HTTP/REST or custom binary
Tunable trade-offs for distribution and replication (N, R, W)
Pre- and post-commit hooks in JavaScript or Erlang, for validation and security.
Map/reduce in JavaScript or Erlang
Links & link walking: use it as a graph database
Indices: put metadata in, search it (coming in 1.0)
Large object support (Luwak)
Comes in "open source" and "enterprise" editions
Full-text search, indexing, querying with Riak Search server (beta)
Masterless multi-site replication replication and SNMP monitoring are commercially licensed

Best used: If you want something Cassandra-like (Dynamo-like), but no way you're gonna deal with the bloat and complexity. If you need very good single-site scalability, availability and fault-tolerance, but you're ready to pay for multi-site replication.

For example: Point-of-sales data collection. Factory control systems. Places where even seconds of downtime hurt. Could be used as a well-update-able web server.

Membase

Written in: Erlang & C
Main point: Memcache compatible, but with persistence and clustering
License: Apache 2.0
Protocol: memcached plus extensions
Very fast (200k+/sec) access of data by key
Persistence to disk
All nodes are identical (master-master replication)
Provides memcached-style in-memory caching buckets, too
Write de-duplication to reduce IO
Very nice cluster-management web GUI
Software upgrades without taking the DB offline
Connection proxy for connection pooling and multiplexing (Moxi)

Best used: Any application where low-latency data access, high concurrency support and high availability is a requirement.

For example: Low-latency use-cases like ad targeting or highly-concurrent web apps like online gaming (e.g. Zynga).

Neo4j

Written in: Java
Main point: Graph database - relationships
License: GPL, some features AGPL/commercial
Protocol: HTTP/REST (or embedding in Java)
Standalone, or embeddable into Java applications
Both vertices and edges can have metadata
Nice self-contained web admin
Advanced path-finding with multiple algorithms
Indexing of keys and relationships
Optimized for reads
Has transactions (in the Java API)
"Gremlin" graph traversal language
Scriptable in Groovy
Online backup, advanced monitoring and High Availability is AGPL/commercial licensed

Best used: For graph-style data. Neo4j is quite different from the others in this sense.

For example: Social relations, public transport links, road maps, network topologies.

Cassandra

Written in: Java
Main point: Best of BigTable and Dynamo
License: Apache
Protocol: Custom, binary (Thrift)
Tunable trade-offs for distribution and replication (N, R, W)
Querying by column, range of keys
BigTable-like features: columns, column families
Writes are much faster than reads (!)
Map/reduce possible with Apache Hadoop
I admit being a bit biased against it, because of the bloat and complexity it has partly because of Java (configuration, seeing exceptions, etc)

Best used: When you write more than you read (logging). If every component of the system must be in Java. ("No one gets fired for choosing Apache's stuff.")

For example: Banking, financial industry (though not necessarily for financial transactions, but these industries are much bigger than that.) Writes are faster than reads, so one natural niche is real time data analysis.