BDNradio interviews with Borland's R&D staff for Delphi 2005 and JBuilder 2005

这是一系列不可错过的现场访谈,聚焦Borland公司的研发团队,他们将分享关于Delphi 2005和JBuilder 2005的见解。访问指定页面获取所有直播聊天,并在EventCentral了解更多即将举行的活动详情。

Don't miss these live interviews with Borland R&D engineers.

Monday November 22nd at 10:00am PST (18:00GMT) Karl Ewald discusses JSF in JBuilder 2005
Tuesday November 23rd at 10:30am PST (18:30GMT) Christian Kemper and Mark Howe discuss JBuilder 2005 productivity features
Wednesday November 24th at 10:00am PST (18:00GMT) Allen Bauer discusses the Delphi 2005 IDE

Monday November 29th at 10:00am PST (18:00GMT) Bob Evans discusses XML refactoring support, unit testing and IBM WebSphere support in JBuilder 2005

Tuesday November 30th at 10:00am PST (18:00GMT) Corbin Dunn discusses refactoring, help/error insight and more in the Delphi 2005 IDE

Monday December 6th at 10:00am PST (18:00GMT) Chris Bensen discusses ActiveX, COM and .NET interop in Delphi 2005

Wednesday December 8th at 10:00am PST (18:00GMT) Seppy Bloom discusses VCL for Win32 and .NET in Delphi 2005

Thursday December 9th at 10:00am PST (18:00GMT) Ravi Kumar discusses support for WebServices in JBuilder 2005

Monday December 20th at 10:00am PST (18:00GMT) Ramesh Theivendran and J鰎g Weingarten discuss database support, dbExpress, BDP and .NET remoting support in Delphi 2005.

Bookmark this page for all live chats and check EventCentral for more details on upcoming events.

IEC 62366 - 1 standard guides the usability testing process for the arrangement of controls and indicators in medical equipment in the following ways: #### User - Identification and Analysis It requires identifying the intended users of the medical equipment, such as healthcare professionals, patients, or caregivers. Understanding the users' characteristics, skills, and limitations is crucial for designing effective control and indicator arrangements. For example, if the equipment is for home use by elderly patients, the controls should be large and easy to operate, and the indicators should be clearly visible. This user - centered approach is fundamental to usability testing, as the tests are designed to ensure that the equipment meets the needs and capabilities of the target users[^1]. #### Defining Use - Scenarios The standard emphasizes the importance of defining realistic use - scenarios for the medical equipment. These scenarios describe how the equipment will be used in actual settings, including normal operations, as well as error - prone or emergency situations. For the arrangement of controls and indicators, the use - scenarios will determine the frequency of use, the sequence of operations, and the context in which the controls and indicators are accessed. Usability testing is then conducted within these defined scenarios to evaluate how well the control and indicator layout supports the users' tasks[^1]. #### Risk Analysis IEC 62366 - 1 mandates a risk analysis related to the use of the medical equipment. For control and indicator arrangements, this involves identifying potential use - errors that could occur due to poor layout, such as incorrect operation of controls, misinterpretation of indicators, or confusion between similar controls. The risk analysis helps in prioritizing the aspects of the control and indicator arrangement that need to be tested. High - risk areas will require more rigorous testing to ensure that the risk of use - errors is minimized[^1]. #### Test Design Based on the identified users, use - scenarios, and risk analysis, the standard guides the design of usability tests. The tests should be representative of real - world use and should involve the actual or simulated use of the medical equipment. For example, usability tests may include tasks such as turning on the equipment, adjusting settings using the controls, and reading the indicators. The test participants should be selected to match the characteristics of the intended users. The test environment should also mimic the actual use environment as closely as possible[^1]. #### Test Execution During the usability testing, the standard provides guidance on collecting data. This can include observing the participants' actions, recording their interactions with the controls and indicators, and collecting their feedback through interviews or questionnaires. The data collected will help in evaluating the effectiveness of the control and indicator arrangement. For example, if participants frequently make errors when trying to access a particular control, it indicates a problem with the layout or labeling of that control[^1]. #### Test Evaluation After the test execution, the collected data is analyzed to evaluate the usability of the control and indicator arrangement. The evaluation criteria are defined based on the requirements of the standard and the identified user needs. For example, the evaluation may consider factors such as the time taken to complete a task, the number of errors made, and the user satisfaction with the control and indicator layout. If the evaluation reveals significant usability issues, the control and indicator arrangement may need to be redesigned and retested[^1]. ```python # This is a simple example of how data from usability testing could be organized test_data = { "participant_1": { "task_1_time": 120, "task_1_errors": 2, "satisfaction_score": 7 }, "participant_2": { "task_1_time": 90, "task_1_errors": 1, "satisfaction_score": 8 } } ```
评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值