【缺陷检测】基于机器视觉实现DIP芯片缺陷检测附Matlab代码

最新推荐文章于 2024-06-05 11:40:20 发布

原创最新推荐文章于 2024-06-05 11:40:20 发布 · 738 阅读

8 ·

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

文章标签：

#依赖倒置原则 #matlab #数码相机

图像处理专栏收录该内容

871 篇文章

订阅专栏

本文介绍了机器视觉技术如何应用于DIP芯片的缺陷检测，包括图像采集、预处理、特征提取和缺陷分类，以及深度学习算法的应用。通过机器视觉，DIP芯片的生产过程实现了高效、准确且非接触的缺陷检测，显著提高了电子制造行业的质量和生产效率。

✅作者简介：热爱科研的Matlab仿真开发者，修心和技术同步精进，代码获取、论文复现及科研仿真合作可私信。

🍎个人主页：Matlab科研工作室

🍊个人信条：格物致知。

更多Matlab完整代码及仿真定制内容点击👇

智能优化算法神经网络预测雷达通信无线传感器电力系统

信号处理图像处理路径规划元胞自动机无人机

物理应用机器学习

🔥 内容介绍

DIP（双列直插式封装）芯片广泛应用于电子行业，其质量直接影响电子产品的性能和可靠性。传统的 DIP 芯片缺陷检测主要依靠人工目检，效率低、准确性差，无法满足现代化生产的需求。机器视觉技术以其非接触、高效、高精度的优势，为 DIP 芯片缺陷检测提供了新的解决方案。

机器视觉原理

机器视觉是一种计算机视觉技术，通过图像传感器获取目标图像，并利用计算机算法对图像进行处理和分析，从而提取目标特征并进行缺陷检测。DIP 芯片缺陷检测的机器视觉系统主要包括以下几个模块：

**图像采集：**使用工业相机或显微镜获取 DIP 芯片的图像。
**图像预处理：**对图像进行降噪、增强、分割等预处理操作，以提高缺陷检测的准确性。
**特征提取：**提取 DIP 芯片图像中的特征，如边缘、纹理、缺陷等。
**缺陷分类：**根据提取的特征，对缺陷进行分类，如缺口、划痕、引脚弯曲等。

缺陷检测算法

DIP 芯片缺陷检测算法主要有以下几种：

**模板匹配：**将标准 DIP 芯片图像作为模板，与待检测图像进行匹配，找出差异区域。
**边缘检测：**利用 Sobel、Canny 等边缘检测算法，检测 DIP 芯片图像中的边缘，并分析边缘的连续性和完整性。
**纹理分析：**分析 DIP 芯片图像的纹理特征，找出纹理异常区域，如划痕、凹陷等。
**深度学习：**利用卷积神经网络（CNN）等深度学习算法，训练模型对 DIP 芯片缺陷进行分类。

系统设计

DIP 芯片缺陷检测机器视觉系统的设计需要考虑以下几个方面：

**照明：**采用环形光或漫反射光源，均匀照射 DIP 芯片，避免阴影和眩光。
**镜头：**选择具有合适焦距和景深的镜头，以获得清晰的图像。
**相机：**选择具有高分辨率和高帧率的工业相机，满足缺陷检测的需求。
**软件：**开发图像处理和缺陷检测算法，并集成到软件平台中。

应用案例

DIP 芯片缺陷检测机器视觉系统已广泛应用于电子制造行业，如：

**半导体封装：**检测 DIP 芯片的引脚弯曲、缺口、划痕等缺陷。
**电子组装：**检测 DIP 芯片在电路板上的错位、虚焊等缺陷。
**质量控制：**对 DIP 芯片进行批量检测，筛选出不合格产品。

优势

基于机器视觉的 DIP 芯片缺陷检测具有以下优势：

**高效：**机器视觉系统可以高速检测 DIP 芯片，大大提高检测效率。
**准确：**机器视觉算法能够准确识别和分类缺陷，避免漏检和误检。
**非接触：**机器视觉检测不接触 DIP 芯片，避免对芯片造成损坏。
**自动化：**机器视觉系统可以实现自动化检测，减少人工参与，降低生产成本。

结论

基于机器视觉的 DIP 芯片缺陷检测技术为电子制造行业提供了高效、准确、非接触的检测解决方案。随着机器视觉技术的不断发展，DIP 芯片缺陷检测的准确性和效率将进一步提高，为电子产品质量控制提供强有力的保障。

📣 部分代码

function [rectx,recty,area,perimeter] = minboundrect(x,y,metric)% minboundrect: Compute the minimal bounding rectangle of points in the plane% usage: [rectx,recty,area,perimeter] = minboundrect(x,y,metric)%% arguments: (input)%  x,y - vectors of points, describing points in the plane as%        (x,y) pairs. x and y must be the same lengths.%%  metric - (OPTIONAL) - single letter character flag which%        denotes the use of minimal area or perimeter as the%        metric to be minimized. metric may be either 'a' or 'p',%        capitalization is ignored. Any other contraction of 'area'%        or 'perimeter' is also accepted.%%        DEFAULT: 'a'    ('area')%% arguments: (output)%  rectx,recty - 5x1 vectors of points that define the minimal%        bounding rectangle.%%  area - (scalar) area of the minimal rect itself.%%  perimeter - (scalar) perimeter of the minimal rect as found%%% Note: For those individuals who would prefer the rect with minimum% perimeter or area, careful testing convinces me that the minimum area% rect was generally also the minimum perimeter rect on most problems% (with one class of exceptions). This same testing appeared to verify my% assumption that the minimum area rect must always contain at least% one edge of the convex hull. The exception I refer to above is for% problems when the convex hull is composed of only a few points,% most likely exactly 3. Here one may see differences between the% two metrics. My thanks to Roger Stafford for pointing out this% class of counter-examples.%% Thanks are also due to Roger for pointing out a proof that the% bounding rect must always contain an edge of the convex hull, in% both the minimal perimeter and area cases.%%% See also: minboundcircle, minboundtri, minboundsphere%%% default for metricif (nargin<3) || isempty(metric)  metric = 'a';elseif ~ischar(metric)  error 'metric must be a character flag if it is supplied.'else  % check for 'a' or 'p'  metric = lower(metric(:)');                      ind = strmatch(metric,{'area','perimeter'});               if isempty(ind)                    error 'metric does not match either ''area'' or ''perimeter'''  end    % just keep the first letter.  metric = metric(1);end% preprocess datax=x(:);y=y(:);% not many error checks to worry aboutn = length(x);                                    if n~=length(y)                                 error 'x and y must be the same sizes'end% if var(x)==0    % start out with the convex hull of the points to% reduce the problem dramatically. Note that any% points in the interior of the convex hull are% never needed, so we drop them.if n>3         %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%    if (var(x)== 0|| var(y)==0)        if var(x)== 0            x = [x-1;x(1); x+1 ];            y = [y ;y(1);y];            flag = 1;        else            y = [y-1;y(1); y+1 ];            x = [x ;x(1);x];            flag = 1;        end            else        flag = 0;     %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%    edges = convhull(x,y);  % 'Pp' will silence the warnings      end  % exclude those points inside the hull as not relevant  % also sorts the points into their convex hull as a  % closed polygon    %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  if flag == 0   %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%            x = x(edges);  y = y(edges);  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%  end  %%%%%%%%%%%%%  % probably fewer points now, unless the points are fully convex  nedges = length(x) - 1;                       elseif n>1  % n must be 2 or 3  nedges = n;  x(end+1) = x(1);  y(end+1) = y(1);else  % n must be 0 or 1  nedges = n;end% now we must find the bounding rectangle of those% that remain.% special case small numbers of points. If we trip any% of these cases, then we are done, so return.switch nedges  case 0    % empty begets empty    rectx = [];    recty = [];    area = [];    perimeter = [];    return  case 1    % with one point, the rect is simple.    rectx = repmat(x,1,5);    recty = repmat(y,1,5);    area = 0;    perimeter = 0;    return  case 2    % only two points. also simple.    rectx = x([1 2 2 1 1]);    recty = y([1 2 2 1 1]);    area = 0;    perimeter = 2*sqrt(diff(x).^2 + diff(y).^2);    returnend% 3 or more points.% will need a 2x2 rotation matrix through an angle thetaRmat = @(theta) [cos(theta) sin(theta);-sin(theta) cos(theta)];% get the angle of each edge of the hull polygon.ind = 1:(length(x)-1);edgeangles = atan2(y(ind+1) - y(ind),x(ind+1) - x(ind));% move the angle into the first quadrant.edgeangles = unique(mod(edgeangles,pi/2));% now just check each edge of the hullnang = length(edgeangles);              area = inf;                           perimeter = inf;met = inf;xy = [x,y];for i = 1:nang                           % rotate the data through -theta   rot = Rmat(-edgeangles(i));  xyr = xy*rot;  xymin = min(xyr,[],1);  xymax = max(xyr,[],1);    % The area is simple, as is the perimeter  A_i = prod(xymax - xymin);  P_i = 2*sum(xymax-xymin);    if metric=='a'    M_i = A_i;  else    M_i = P_i;  end    % new metric value for the current interval. Is it better?  if M_i<met    % keep this one    met = M_i;    area = A_i;    perimeter = P_i;        rect = [xymin;[xymax(1),xymin(2)];xymax;[xymin(1),xymax(2)];xymin];    rect = rect*rot';    rectx = rect(:,1);    recty = rect(:,2);  endend% get the final rect% all doneend % mainline end