Look forward to Echo3

Echo3在保留Echo2大部分API的同时,引入新的Web容器层,极大提升了性能和扩展性。开发者可以选择使用客户端JavaScript或服务器端Java进行开发。测试结果显示,Echo3相较于Echo2性能提高了61%。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

The new stuff of Echo3

Echo3 nearly retains the API of Echo2 for end developers, but provides a new web container layer that offers superior performance and extensibility. The new web container also provides the capability to write Echo applications entirely in client-side JavaScript using an API patterned after that of server-side Echo (using the client API is entirely optional, Echo3 applications may also be written entirely in server-side Java).

Some Echo3 Vs. Echo2 Performance Numbers

Take these numbers with a grain of salt, but here's a ghost test run of Echo3 vs. Echo2. Ran this test on a Core Duo 1 MacBook, 1.8GHz, 2GB memory, OS X Tiger, Jetty, JDK 1.5, Firefox 2.0.0.7. The browser was using nearly 100% of 1 core, the JVM was using 5% of the other (client and server were running on same machine). Echo2 is latest SVN, Echo3 is near latest. Echo3 was dumping all synchronization messages to the console as well, probably should turn that off, but it might not even make a difference.

Echo2 test:
localhost:8080/InteractiveTest/ia?ghost=1&script=1&iterations=500
105 seconds 4.76 iterations/second.

Echo3 test:
localhost:8080/TestApp/app?ghost=1&script=1&iterations=500
65 seconds 7.69 iterations/second.

61% faster.

 

That's cool. There is only one reason I don't like this Ajax framework is because the performance. I think no body will stand such slow application even if it's beautiful. But~ the performance result of Echo3 is 61% faster than Echo2. WOW... I'm sure I will take time to research it.


http://echo.nextapp.com/site/echo3
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值