题目:
You are given two linked lists representing two non-negative numbers. The digits are stored in reverse order and each of their nodes contain a single digit. Add the two numbers and return it as a linked list.
Input: (2 -> 4 -> 3) + (5 -> 6 -> 4)
Output: 7 -> 0 -> 8
其实拿到这题的时候,思考的时间还是挺久的,因为要考虑的情况挺多的,
1>首先处理错误输入
2>然后就是当l1与l2的下面next节点不为空时怎么处理
3>那么当l1,l2有一个next节点为空时,又怎么处理,
4>最后进位的维持与最终是否要生成新的节点,
这些都需要考虑进去,第一版代码相对来说挺长,但很好理解。
/**
* Definition for singly-linked list.
* public class ListNode {
* int val;
* ListNode next;
* ListNode(int x) { val = x; }
* }
*/
public class Solution {
public ListNode addTwoNumbers(ListNode l1, ListNode l2) {
if (l1 == null)
return l2;
if (l2 == null)
return l1;
int jinwei = 0;
//记录需要返回的节点
ListNode result = null;
//记录经运算形成的节点
ListNode node = null;
ListNode temp1 = l1;
ListNode temp2 = l2;
while (temp1 != null && temp2 != null) {
ListNode listNode = null;
int sum = temp1.val + temp2.val + jinwei;
listNode = new ListNode(sum%10);
jinwei = sum/10;
if (node != null) {
node.next = listNode;
} else {
result = listNode;
}
node = listNode;
temp1 = temp1.next;
temp2 = temp2.next;
}
while(temp2 != null ){
int sum = temp2.val + jinwei;
ListNode listNode = new ListNode(sum%10);
jinwei = sum/10;
node.next = listNode;
node = listNode;
temp2 = temp2.next;
}
while(temp1 != null ){
int sum = temp1.val + jinwei;
ListNode listNode = new ListNode(sum%10);
jinwei = sum/10;
node.next = listNode;
node = listNode;
temp1 = temp1.next;
}
if(jinwei == 1){
ListNode listNode = new ListNode(1);
node.next = listNode;
}
return result;
}
相应的Leetcode运行显示为:Runtime: 500 ms,Your runtime beats 13.03% of java coders。那么有没有有更为简洁高效的 代码呢?(下面这段代码不是本人的,我看讨论区里较为简洁且执行时间较为快捷的)
/**
* Definition for singly-linked list.
* public class ListNode {
* int val;
* ListNode next;
* ListNode(int x) { val = x; }
* }
*/
public class Solution {
public ListNode addTwoNumbers(ListNode l1, ListNode l2) {
int carry =0;
ListNode newHead = new ListNode(0);
ListNode p1 = l1, p2 = l2, p3=newHead;
while(p1 != null || p2 != null){
if(p1 != null){
carry += p1.val;
p1 = p1.next;
}
if(p2 != null){
carry += p2.val;
p2 = p2.next;
}
p3.next = new ListNode(carry%10);
p3 = p3.next;
carry /= 10;
}
if(carry==1)
p3.next=new ListNode(1);
return newHead.next;
}
}
相应的执行时间为Runtime: 428 ms,Your runtime beats 89.83% of java coders.
其实个人分析而言,感觉第二种解题的方式需要学习,写出来的代码简洁且性能较优,但第一种解法与第二种解法,本人的看法是两者的执行时间应该基本相同,更确切的说,第一种解法的速度应该较第二种解法更快速,因为第二种解法的while循环中判断次数比第一种解法多,在这里会浪费一点时间,但很微小,因为这两种解法的时间复杂度都是一样的。