From: https://leetcode.com/problems/two-sum/
Given an array of integers, find two numbers such that they add up to a specific target number.
The function twoSum should return indices of the two numbers such that they add up to the target, where index1 must be less than index2. Please note that your returned answers (both index1 and index2) are not zero-based.
You may assume that each input would have exactly one solution.
Input: numbers={2, 7, 11, 15}, target=9
Output: index1=1, index2=2
class Solution {
public:
vector<int> twoSum(vector<int>& nums, int target) {
vector<int> copy(nums.begin(), nums.end());
sort(copy.begin(), copy.end());
int st=0, ed=copy.size()-1;
while(st < ed) {
if(copy[st]+copy[ed] == target) break;
if(copy[st]+copy[ed] > target) ed--;
else st++;
}
vector<int> ans;
if(copy[st]+copy[ed] != target) return ans;
int t1=copy[st], t2=copy[ed];
st=-1; ed=-1;
for(int i=0, len=nums.size(); i<len; i++) {
if(nums[i]==t1 || nums[i]==t2) {
if(st == -1) st=i;
else if(nums[st]+nums[i] == target){ ed=i; break; }
}
}
ans.push_back(st+1);
ans.push_back(ed+1);
return ans;
}
};
class Solution {
public:
vector<int> twoSum(vector<int> &nums, int target) {
unordered_map<int,int> occured;
vector<int> ans;
for(int i=0; i<nums.size(); ++i) {
if(occured.find(target-nums[i])!=occured.end()) {
ans.push_back(occured[target-nums[i]]+1);
ans.push_back(i+1);
break;
}
if(occured.find(nums[i]) == occured.end()) {
occured[nums[i]] = i;
}
}
return ans;
}
};
貌似后者的速度应该更快,但从leetcode执行结果看,前者更快。
本文深入探讨了LeetCode上经典的两数之和问题,对比了使用vector和unordered_map两种不同方法的实现,并分析了各自的时间复杂度和空间效率,揭示了实际执行结果中效率的反常现象。
152

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



