zpool iostat <pool> 1 100的可信赖性

本文探讨了使用zpool iostat命令时遇到的latency列的可靠性问题,并提供了如何解读该数值及进一步排查性能瓶颈的建议。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

Q:We are wondering whether the "latency" column shown by the command "zpool iostat <pool> 1 100" is reliable enough to be taken into account for troubleshooting. For instance, in the following paste shows max values between 700 - 750 (ms?) which we think are very high. https://hig.eis.utoronto.ca/pwd/?938aeeab597fb5ed#B5j0hrcT/4+9DZ6lXLk9wnZNy2WwItSD0Jox7GMDLVc=

Would you please clarify? I have search documentation about this topic online and couldn't be able to find anything. This column seems to be part of ZFS only in Nexenta, since I couldn't see it neither in Solaris 11 nor OpenIndiana 11.


A:Yes, the numbers you see there are meaningful. I will caution that they're isolated to a specific layer, so they don't fully explain what is going on and why. You may find that `zpool iostat -v` gives you more informative information (per-disk) with the same caveat applied. `iostat -xn` may also be informative, although here again I will caution that the %b number which can often hit "100%" can easily be misinterpreted -- the service time columns are generally more representative and easier to interpret.

The `zpool iostat` functionality is present in most or all modern OpenZFS implementations.

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值