直接上sql
SELECT
t3.`id`,
t3.img,
t4.`name` AS className,
t1.`category_sku_code` AS skuCode
FROM
mj_goods t1
LEFT JOIN mj_category_sku t2 ON t2.tenant_id = 63
AND t2.`id` = t1.`category_sku_id`
LEFT JOIN mj_category t3 ON t3.tenant_id = 63
AND t3.id = t2.category_id
LEFT JOIN mj_category_class t4 ON t4.tenant_id = 63
AND t3.`class_id` = t4.`id`
WHERE
t1.tenant_id = 63
AND (t1.category_sku_code = ('SMKM5892-LPD蓝色L')
or t1.line_goods_num = ('SMKM5892-LPD蓝色L')
or t3.num IN ('SMKM5892-LPD蓝色L') )
其中,category_sku_code ,line_goods_num ,num都分别建了索引,执行计划如下

可以看到,全表扫描了
如果拆开分别查询,再联合,这样就会使用索引
SELECT
t3.`id`,
t3.img,
t4.`name` AS className,
t1.`category_sku_code` AS skuCode
FROM
mj_goods t1
LEFT JOIN mj_category_sku t2 ON t2.tenant_id = 63
AND t2.`id` = t1.`category_sku_id`
LEFT JOIN mj_category t3 ON t3.tenant_id = 63
AND t3.id = t2.category_id
LEFT JOIN mj_category_class t4 ON t4.tenant_id = 63
AND t3.`class_id` = t4.`id`
WHERE
t1.tenant_id = 63
AND t1.category_sku_code IN ( 'SMKM5892-LPD蓝色L' ) UNION
SELECT
t3.`id`,
t3.img,
t4.`name` AS className,
t1.`line_goods_num` AS skuCode
FROM
mj_goods t1
LEFT JOIN mj_category_sku t2 ON t2.tenant_id = 63
AND t2.`id` = t1.`category_sku_id`
LEFT JOIN mj_category t3 ON t3.tenant_id = 63
AND t3.id = t2.category_id
LEFT JOIN mj_category_class t4 ON t4.tenant_id = 63
AND t3.`class_id` = t4.`id`
WHERE
t1.tenant_id = 63
AND t1.line_goods_num IN ( 'SMKM5892-LPD蓝色L' ) UNION
SELECT
t1.`id`,
t1.img,
t2.`name` AS className,
t1.num AS skuCode
FROM
mj_category t1
LEFT JOIN mj_category_class t2 ON t2.tenant_id = 63
AND t1.`class_id` = t2.`id`
WHERE
t1.tenant_id = 63
AND t1.num IN ( 'SMKM5892-LPD蓝色L' )
执行计划如下

博客探讨了一条复杂的SQL查询在全表扫描下效率低下的问题。通过拆分查询并使用UNION,实现了利用索引来提高查询性能。文章详细展示了优化前后的执行计划,并强调了正确使用索引在数据库查询优化中的重要性。
10万+

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



