HTA in Hospitals

本文介绍了加拿大医院内部实施的健康技术评估(HTA)活动及其影响。魁北克地区的大学附属医院已建立了成熟的HTA单位,并正在扩大到其他机构。这些单位负责评估医疗设备的有效性和成本效益,为政策制定提供依据。阿尔伯塔省正在加强省级HTA项目,安大略省也有两家医院开展HTA工作。

引自:http://www.cadth.ca/products/environmental-scanning/health-technology-update/htupdate-issue-13/hta-in-hospitals

The use of hospital-based health technology assessment (HTA) is growing in Canada. The desire for evidence-based decision-making and the need to sustain hospital budgets have created a demand for information on the efficacy, safety, costs, ethical, legal, and operational issues in the adoption of technologies. Hospital-based HTA, due to its proximity to the decision-maker and collaborative approach, has been shown to influence health policy and clinical practice.1

In Quebec, hospital-based HTA is well-established within the network of five university hospital centres, and is now expanding at other university institutes and affiliated university centres (Table 1). Cardiac and rehabilitation centres in Montreal and Quebec are establishing HTA units. An HTA unit also exists at l’Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal. A group of five health and social services centres — which are multidisciplinary institutions operating local community service centres, residential and long-term care centres, and may include general and specialized hospital centres — have formed a consortium (Consortium pour l’évaluation des technologies et des modes d’intervention en santé et services sociaux or CETMISSS) to share resources to promote HTA, provide training to managers and health care professionals, and to undertake HTA projects on topics related to primary care.

The mandate of Quebec’s university hospital HTA units are to conduct rigorous evaluations of medical devices, treatments, or delivery of health care services, and to develop policy recommendations relevant to their organizational context.2,3 They are also involved in the training of researchers in evaluative methods, promoting a culture of evaluation, fostering networks, and disseminating knowledge. The units’ scientific staff work in collaboration with the institutions’ managers and health professionals throughout the evaluation process, from the selection and prioritization of topics, to collection and interpretation of evidence and the development of policy recommendations.2,3 The HTA units are linked by various networks that encourage collaboration between researchers at the regional and provincial levels. For example, the CETMISSS is situated in the integrated university health network of the Université Laval and collaborates with the HTA unit of the Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CHUQ). Leadership and support is also provided by the Agence d’évaluation des technologies et des modes d’intervention en santé (AETMIS). Funding to support HTA activities within Quebec’s health care centres has been allocated from within existing institutional operational budgets, with no additional sources of funding.

TABLE 1: Hospital-Based HTA Programs

Alberta

Health Technology Assessment and Innovation (HTAi) Program, Alberta Health Services

    Ontario

    London Health Sciences Centre

    SickKids Hospital (http://pede.ccb.sickkids.ca/pede/task.jsp)

    Quebec ― University Hospital Centres

    Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM)
    (http://www.chumtl.qc.ca/notre-equipe/directions/detmis.fr.html)

    Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS)
    (http://www.chus.qc.ca/fr/general/gen_informationnelles.asp#etmis)

    Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CHUQ)
    (http://www.chuq.qc.ca/fr/evaluation/uetmis/evaluation_uetmis.htm)

    Centre hospitalier universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHU Sainte-Justine)
    (http://www.chu-sainte-justine.org/Pro/micro-portails.aspx?AxeID=16)

    McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) (http://www.mcgill.ca/tau/)

    Quebec ― Other Institutions With HTA Activities

    Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal
    (http://www.hscm.ca/evaluation-des-technologies-et-des-modes-dintervention-en-sante/index.html)

    Montreal Heart Institute/Institut de Cardiologie de Montréal

    Lindsay Rehabilitation Hospital /Institut de réadaptation
    (Gingras-Lindsay-de-Montréal (http://www.hopital-lindsay.qc.ca/)

    Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec

    Consortium pour l’évaluation des technologies et des modes d’intervention en santé et services sociaux (CETMISSS)

    The HTA units have had a substantial impact on local policy decisions. Between 2002 and 2007, the policy recommendations of 25 of 27 reports produced by the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) technology assessment unit have been accepted and incorporated into hospital policy.4 Rejection or limited acceptance of 19 technologies resulted in an estimated savings of C$12.8 million, and adoption of six new technologies increased expenditures by C$1.0 million.4 Operating costs for the technology assessment unit totalled $1.2 million over the five-year period.4 The HTA unit at CHUQ reported high satisfaction with the technology assessment process among clinicians who requested an assessment or were involved in a working group.5 The clinicians also reported that the evaluations made an impact on their practice. Sixty-nine per cent of recommendations from two reports were accepted resulting in annual cost savings of $460,000.5 The MUHC HTA unit reported that the evaluations were completed within three to four months.1 Success of the program was related to the timeliness, relevance to local decision-makers, and the formulation of policy that reflected the community’s values.1

    Alberta is in the process of enhancing the provincial program for technology assessment. The amalgamation of the province’s nine health regions, mental health, cancer, addictions, and emergency medical services into one health care delivery entity, Alberta Health Services, has created an opportunity for an integrated approach encompassing the spectrum of care. In collaboration with Alberta Health and Wellness, Alberta Health Services is developing the Health Technology Assessment and Innovation (HTAI) program that will encourage the use of health technology assessments to make decisions at an operational level. The HTAI program will complement the provincial government’s Alberta Health Technologies Decision Process, which evaluates and approves technologies that require provincial or national review.

    The HTAI program’s goals are to stimulate the uptake of innovative technologies with proven clinical and cost-effectiveness, explore opportunities to support access to technologies through evidence development, and discourage the use of obsolete or proven ineffective technologies. The program will evaluate technologies ― excluding drugs and information systems — used in health promotion, disease prevention, screening, diagnosis, therapy, rehabilitation, and end-of-life care. The proposed process will include identification and prioritization of technologies, commissioning the production of assessments, incorporation of contextual conditions, development of recommendations, and submission to the Alberta Health Services’ budgetary and decision-making process. The process will also include evaluating the impact of approved technologies and whether or not they achieved the results intended. The program will build on the existing expertise in HTA available in Alberta, including hospital-based units in Calgary and Edmonton, as well as the Institute of Health Economics, the University of Calgary, and the University of Alberta. Development and implementation of the HTAI Program is planned for 2010-2011.

    Ontario has two groups undertaking hospital-based HTA ― the High Impact Technology Evaluation Centre (HiTEC) at the London Health Sciences Centre and Technology Assessment at SickKids (TASK), a research institute-based unit at Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids).6 TASK is funded mainly by research grants, and conducts methodological research and economic evaluations in pediatrics, in addition to HTA. It undertakes HTA activities based on consultation with hospital administrators and clinicians.

    At other institutions without a formal technology assessment unit, HTA is nonetheless incorporated into technology decisions. For example, Vancouver General Hospital is in the process of standardizing the equipment and products used in surgical services. Working in collaboration with surgeons and administrators, the hospital is developing a standardized process to reduce the number and variety of products purchased, and has incorporated evidence review into its decision-making. HTA is used to addressing budget pressures without sacrificing quality of care.

    Reports produced by hospital-based HTA units are often available on their units’ websites and some are indexed in the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination database (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/crdweb/).

    Références

    1. McGregor M, et al. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005; 21(2):263-267.

    2. What is the Technology Assessment Unit? McGill Technology Assessment Unit, MUHC 2010.http://www.mcgill.ca/tau/objective/

    3.  Mission. Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec. http://www.chuq.qc.ca/fr/evaluation/uetmis/mission/

    4.  Arnoldo J, et al. Impact of TAU reports. McGill Technology Assessment Unit, MUHC 2008.http://www.mcgill.ca/files/tau/FINAL_TAU_IMPACT_REPORT_FEB_2008.pdf

    5.  Rapport annuel 2008-2009. Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec 2010. http://www.chuq.qc.ca/NR/rdonlyres/8EC83C28-401A-4BD5-9AF6-317B72E218F1/0/rapport_annuel_uetmis_2008_2009.pdf

    6.  Battista RN, et al. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:53-60.

    纸张与塑料实例分割数据集 一、基础信息 • 数据集名称:纸张与塑料实例分割数据集 • 图片数量: 训练集:5304张图片 验证集:440张图片 总计:5744张图片 • 训练集:5304张图片 • 验证集:440张图片 • 总计:5744张图片 • 分类类别: 纸张(paper):常见的可回收材料,广泛用于包装和日常用品。 塑料(plastic):合成聚合物材料,在垃圾处理和回收中需准确识别。 • 纸张(paper):常见的可回收材料,广泛用于包装和日常用品。 • 塑料(plastic):合成聚合物材料,在垃圾处理和回收中需准确识别。 • 标注格式:YOLO格式,包含实例分割多边形标注,适用于实例分割任务。 • 数据格式:图片数据来源于相关领域,标注精确,支持模型训练。 二、适用场景 • 垃圾自动分类系统开发:数据集支持实例分割任务,帮助构建能够精确分割纸张和塑料物体的AI模型,用于智能垃圾桶、回收设施或环境监测系统。 • 环境监测与保护应用:集成至环保监控平台,实时检测和分类垃圾,促进垃圾分类、回收和可持续发展。 • 学术研究与创新:支持计算机视觉与环保领域的交叉研究,为垃圾识别和材料分类提供数据基础,推动AI在环境科学中的应用。 • 工业自动化与物流:在制造业或物流环节中,用于自动化检测和分类材料,提升生产效率和资源管理。 三、数据集优势 • 精准标注与实用性:每张图片均经过仔细标注,实例分割边界精确,确保模型能够学习纸张和塑料的细粒度特征。 • 数据多样性:涵盖多种场景和条件,提升模型在不同环境下的泛化能力和鲁棒性。 • 任务适配性强:标注兼容主流深度学习框架(如YOLO等),可直接用于实例分割模型训练,并支持扩展至其他视觉任务。 • 应用价值突出:专注于可回收材料检测,为垃圾管理、环保政策和自动化系统提供可靠数据支撑,助力绿色科技发展。
    代码转载自:https://pan.quark.cn/s/fc36d9cf1917 《建筑工程施工强制性条文检查记录》是针对建筑工程施工过程中的核心环节进行合规性审核的关键性文件,其目的在于保障施工质量与施工安全。 这份文件收录了建筑工程施工过程中必须遵守的国家强制性准则、指令和技术规范,对于建筑施工作业单位、监理机构以及相关行政管理部门而言,均构成不可替代的参考资料。 建筑工程施工强制性条文主要涵盖以下几个方面的内容:1. **设计与施工准则**:工程项目的设计需符合国家的建筑设计准则,涵盖结构稳固性、防火性能、抗震性能、环保性能等方面的标准。 在施工作业阶段,必须严格依照设计图纸和施工计划进行,任何变更均需获得设计单位的一致许可。 2. **建筑材料品质**:所有投入使用的建筑材料,例如混凝土、钢筋、砌块等,都必须具备出厂合格证明,并接受第三方检测机构的品质验证。 严禁采用不合格或已过有效期的材料。 3. **施工安全措施**:在施工作业期间必须恪守安全生产准则,设置安全防护装置,例如脚手架、安全网、警示标识等。 施工人员需接受安全知识培训,并使用个人防护用品。 4. **环境管理**:施工作业应控制噪音、粉尘、废弃物等对环境可能造成的负面影响,推行绿色施工理念,采取降尘、防噪、废弃物分类处理等手段。 5. **工程质量监管**:每个施工作业阶段完成后,需实施自检、互检和专项检查,确保每一道工序的合格性。 对于基础工程、主体结构、防水工程等关键部位,应执行严格的验收流程。 6. **工程验收流程**:工程完工后,必须依照国家规范进行验收,涵盖单位工程验收、分部工程验收和整体工程验收,确保工程符合设计和使用需求。 7. **文档管理**:施工作业期间产生的技术文件、检测报告、会议记...
    评论
    成就一亿技术人!
    拼手气红包6.0元
    还能输入1000个字符
     
    红包 添加红包
    表情包 插入表情
     条评论被折叠 查看
    添加红包

    请填写红包祝福语或标题

    红包个数最小为10个

    红包金额最低5元

    当前余额3.43前往充值 >
    需支付:10.00
    成就一亿技术人!
    领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
    hope_wisdom
    发出的红包
    实付
    使用余额支付
    点击重新获取
    扫码支付
    钱包余额 0

    抵扣说明:

    1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
    2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

    余额充值