PHP Accelerators : APC vs Zend vs XCache with Zend Framework

最新推荐文章于 2025-08-09 14:59:10 发布

昆山人在上海

最新推荐文章于 2025-08-09 14:59:10 发布

阅读量584

点赞数

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

分类专栏： PHP研究文章标签： zend php components performance application session

本文链接：https://blog.youkuaiyun.com/kunshan_shenbin/article/details/6083333

PHP研究专栏收录该内容

102 篇文章

订阅专栏

本文通过实验对比了APC、Zend Optimizer和XCache等PHP加速器在运行包含大量组件的Zend Framework应用程序时的表现。结果显示，在相同的测试环境下，APC提供了最高的请求处理能力。

摘要生成于 C知道，由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持，前往体验 >

转自： http://blog.digitalstruct.com/2007/12/23/php-accelerators-apc-vs-zend-vs-xcache-with-zend-framework/

Tonight I wanted to see how the Zend Framework would run against an application that I have put in quite a bit of components into. I figured with the amount of objects that have been instanciated that there was likely going to be a larger performance hit overall. These results may surprise you with what really made a difference as far as PHP Accelerators.

Zend Framework : Release 1.0.3

Zend_Cache
Zend_Config
Zend_Config_Xml
Zend_Db
Zend_Db_Table
Zend_Registry
Zend_Loader
Zend_Controller_Front
Zend_Auth
Zend_Acl
Zend_Acl_Role
Zend_Acl_Resource
Zend_Session
Zend_Session_Namespace

Testing Environment

PHP 5.2.5
Apache 2.2.6

Test Results

Pure PHP

Concurrency Level:      10

Time taken for tests:   60.655071 seconds

Complete requests:      298

Failed requests:        0

Write errors:           0

Total transferred:      643149 bytes

HTML transferred:       516971 bytes

Requests per second:    4.91 [#/sec] (mean)

Time per request:       2035.405 [ms] (mean)

Time per request:       203.541 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)

Transfer rate:          10.35 [Kbytes/sec] received

APC

Concurrency Level:      10

Time taken for tests:   60.106697 seconds

Complete requests:      914

Failed requests:        0

Write errors:           0

Total transferred:      1962675 bytes

HTML transferred:       1582035 bytes

Requests per second:    15.21 [#/sec] (mean)

Time per request:       657.623 [ms] (mean)

Time per request:       65.762 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)

Transfer rate:          31.88 [Kbytes/sec] received

Zend Optimizer

Concurrency Level:      10

Time taken for tests:   60.302711 seconds

Complete requests:      262

Failed requests:        0

Write errors:           0

Total transferred:      564135 bytes

HTML transferred:       454727 bytes

Requests per second:    4.34 [#/sec] (mean)

Time per request:       2301.630 [ms] (mean)

Time per request:       230.163 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)

Transfer rate:          9.12 [Kbytes/sec] received

XCache

Concurrency Level:      10

Time taken for tests:   60.261114 seconds

Complete requests:      292

Failed requests:        0

Write errors:           0

Total transferred:      628485 bytes

HTML transferred:       506597 bytes

Requests per second:    4.85 [#/sec] (mean)

Time per request:       2063.737 [ms] (mean)

Time per request:       206.374 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)

Transfer rate:          10.17 [Kbytes/sec] received

Conclusions

What I find quite interesting about this, is that APC was the only one to provide a much higher amount of requests while all the others slowed the requests down. I believe this may be related to utilizing the Zend_Loader functionality which also slows some items down for anything attempting to optimize and cache. I believe after I change that I am going to run these tests again and see if there is any large speed changes. I will post more about this more than likely in a week or so.