Suddenly woke to the danger we were in.

一起夜间自动银行取款遭遇暴力抢劫致死事件引发反思。事件中,取款人在短短3秒内被连刺9刀身亡,揭示了面对突发暴力犯罪时的应对误区。本文提供了在类似情境下的生存策略及预防措施。
生命有时候真的很脆弱 ...
以后卡里头只能放千把块钱 ,偷了就偷了吧,抢了就抢了吧。
3秒钟被刺 9刀,太震惊了!才晚上 7点多,歹徒就敢如此嚣张,这不是给我们狠狠地敲响了警钟吗?!一般人的惯性思维是认为夜深才会有夺命歹徒出没(请注意是"夺命"),尤其是在自动银行这样人流量不算少的公共地方。这个视频我反复看了10 遍。心想,当时如果换成是我在场取钱,估计也是死路一条。歹徒从抱住受害人推到墙角捅刀子,这个过程只有3秒钟。3秒钟就要了一个人的命!!!!
用现在比较时髦的一个词来说,就是歹徒和取钱人的信息"不对称"。歹徒目的非常明确∶用刀捅死你!而那个取钱人感觉是 ∶这个人可能(只是可能还不明确)想抢钱?根本不知道是自己会被杀。所以他做出的行为是∶输错密码让卡被吞(目的是让歹徒抢不到钱)。这其实是一厢情愿的做法,当吐出纸条时,歹徒抱他,他心中可能还舒了一小口气,认为你这下拿不到钱了,你丫的还能怎样??打就打,我怕你啊!!但是他想错了,歹徒直接要的是他的命!!就这么直接干脆迅速。从回放镜头看,歹徒抱住他,他一回身打了一记右摆拳,但打空了被歹徒卡住脖子迅速推到墙壁,然后就是大力捅刀子,直接致命。令人震撼的3秒钟啊!令人唏嘘不已的3秒钟啊!
他到死可能都没弄明白,为什么会这样??会这么快就被捅死??这就是信息不对称的结果。我想,如果时光能倒退回去,让受害人从头再做一次,他肯定不会这么处理。我想他一定不会把卡插进去,肯定会走到一旁,示意让歹徒先取款,说自己在等人。我想这种情况下,歹徒一般不会拔出刀行凶,因为抢钱的目的没达到。然后在电话里说你到了吗,对,就这个自动银行,你在对面啊,好,我出来接你之类的,然后走出去。(大家说这个办法好吗?)
如果已经把卡插进去了,怎么办,是不是应该重重拍一下取款机台说 ∶TMD的,取款机又没钱,然后迅速回头跟歹徒说,操他吗的,真衰!!就这么看着歹徒的眼睛果断走出门去。我想歹徒在短短的时间内也难判断是否该拦住他,还是捅他?因为没有啊!对吧?
假设最坏的结果是,歹徒不管有没钱,都掏出刀子捅,那就看你造化了,你不可再象那位仁兄一样,只是推推搡搡,不痛不痒的迎击,等着被捅死。你肯定会奋尽全力一搏,比如用腿狠揣歹徒腹部或其下身,阻击他不让靠近,一边伺机开门逃出去。这时候为了命,你什么都做的出,因为你已经知道不是生就是死!!!死死盯住他的持刀那只手,找准机会抓住其手臂,然后用头猛撞歹徒的面部,用牙咬他的鼻子或耳朵,用另一只手抠他的眼珠子,我想这时候用什么招都行,关键要实用(就是迅速让歹徒失去战斗力)!
非常惋惜那位受害人,如果时光倒退一点点,歹徒抱住他的腰,我想正确的做法应该是迅速回身(他做到了),关键是要紧紧抓住歹徒的双手腕(他没做到),目的是让他捅不了刀子,然后用额头猛烈撞击歹徒鼻子,狠咬歹徒的脸肉,受害人死就死在他以为只是一般的打斗,不知是要他的命!这个案例给我们很大的启示 ∶
[color=red]1 、尽量不在夜间取款。
2、要取就到人多的地方取。
3、碰到有可疑的人在身后,迅速离开,不要取款。
4、如果在取款的时候突然有人抱住你,你只能尽全力一搏了,撕咬、踢裆、头撞、背摔,看你造化了。[/color]
非常憎恨这个穷凶极恶的歹徒,为受害人感到无比悲伤,这是一个活生生的例子,每个人都有可能碰到,不是你死就是歹徒死,当你面对这种险情时,你准备好了吗??????
7-364 Coconuts, Revisited 分数 10 作者 伍健全 单位 重庆科技大学 The short story titled Coconuts, by Ben Ames Williams, appeared in the Saturday Evening Post on October 9, 1926. The story tells about five men and a monkey who were shipwrecked on an island. They spent the first night gathering coconuts. During the night, one man woke up and decided to take his share of the coconuts. He divided them into five piles. One coconut was left over so he gave it to the monkey, then hid his share and went back to sheep. Soon a second man woke up and did the same thing. After dividing the coconuts into five piles, one coconut was left over which he gave to the monkey. He then hid his share and went back to bed. The third, fourth, and fifth man followed exactly the same procedure. The next morning, after they all woke up, they divided the remaining coconuts into five equal shares. This time no coconuts were left over. An obvious question is "how many coconuts did they originally gather?" There are an infinite number of answers, but the lowest of these is 3,121. But that's not our problem here. Suppose we turn the problem around. If we know the number of coconuts that were gathered, what is the maximum number of persons (and one monkey) that could have been shipwrecked if the same procedure could occur? 输入格式: The input will consist of a sequence of integers, each representing the number of coconuts gathered by a group of persons (and a monkey) that were shipwrecked. The sequence will be followed by a negative number. 输出格式: For each number of coconuts, determine the largest number of persons who could have participated in the procedure described above. Display the results similar to the manner shown below, in the Expected Output. There may be no solution for some of the input cases; if so, state that observation. 输入样例: 在这里给出一组输入。例如: 25 30 3121 -1 输出样例: 在这里给出相应的输出。例如: 25 coconuts, 3 persons and 1 monkey 30 coconuts, no solution 3121 coconuts, 5 persons and 1 monkey 代码长度限制 16 KB 时间限制 400 ms 内存限制 64 MB 栈限制 8192 KB C (gcc) 1 c语言
11-14
评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值