3 Big Factors to consider choosing between RFT & UFT

最新推荐文章于 2024-02-29 12:50:41 发布

原创最新推荐文章于 2024-02-29 12:50:41 发布 · 163 阅读

0 ·

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

文章标签：

#RFT #UFT

Automation Tool 专栏收录该内容

3 篇文章

订阅专栏

本文探讨了Rational Functional Tester (RFT) 和 Unified Functional Testing (UFT) 在开源工具集成、持续集成模型下的便利性及Linux环境下的适用性等关键因素。通过对比分析，为读者提供了选择合适自动化测试工具的参考。

Factor 1-

IBM RFT can be extended to use the open source tools in case of the limitations in RFT. Few open source tools to name – Selenium, FlexMonkium.
While UFT provides no such option to use it in combination with other open source tools using direct mechanism.

Hence in a situation where a client is using “Selenium” for his testing, a way could be found( no direct mechanism yet ) to migrate his existing automation suite / plug in RFT in his existing Test Suite which provides the room for further integration of Rational Products i.e.

Test Management – IBM Test Manager

Factor 2-

In a Continuous Integration (CI) Model Integration of HP Automation Tool is conveniently achieved through ALM (HP) & also through open source integration with Jenkins

Though RFT has its Test Manager (IBM) in a CI Model it fails to impress since there is no direct Integration with Jenkins – rather achieved through a plain .bat file.

Jenkins provides an easy-to-use so-called continuous integration system, making it easier for developers to integrate changes to the project, and making it easier for users to obtain a fresh build. The automated, continuous build increases the productivity. – Source Jenkins Wiki

Factor 3-

If the target system is LINUX then there is very little which can be achieved with UFT.

RFT – Supports Test Execution in Linux Environment with Firefox Browser

UFT – Runs Test only in Windows Family

http://studyautomation.com/3-big-factors-consider-choosing-rft-uft/