本文讨论了从多种独立资源中自由获取并验证数据的过程。强调每个词条都必须来自至少两个不同的源头，并由合格的语言学家进行审查。这体现了从单一来源窃取是剽窃，而从多个来源则是研究的原则。
发信人: armor (铠甲), 信区: ITExpress
标 题: 这个slashdot 评论牛
发信站: 水木社区 (Mon Apr 9 09:37:54 2007), 站内
标 题: 这个slashdot 评论牛
发信站: 水木社区 (Mon Apr 9 09:37:54 2007), 站内
In fact, we liberated data quite freely from any resource we could obtain.
I made it a policy that each dictionary term had to come from at least two
independent sources (sources unlikely to have stolen from each other). The
singletons had to be manually reviewed by a qualified linguist. It's like
that old saying: stealing from one source is plagiarism, stealing from
multiple sources is research.
※ 修改:・utopiazh 于 Apr 9 18:30:42 修改本信・[FROM: 202.38.73.*]
扫一扫
4344
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
