D语言现状From2007

作者指出D语言当前版本频繁出现的bug严重影响了代码的稳定性,并建议D语言社区建立稳定版和不稳定版两个分支来解决这一问题。同时,作者还强调了文档中明确版本差异的重要性。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

I'm sure this was brought up in the past, but DMD definitely needs stable 
and unstable branches.

-v1 doesn't cut it. My code is compiled with -v1 and still breaks with new 
DMD versions.

Each new DMD version is bug-ridden. This new one 1.011 is pretty bad!

How am I supposed to let others use my code when there's no stability in 
the compiler? They update their compiler and report to me "your code is 
broken"; well, no, DMD is broken.

I have a ton of code that doesn't work on any of the new DMD compilers; I 
have to use an old pre-1.0 compiler, because the recent compilers are 
bug-ridden. Some bugs get fixed, but even more get added.

I'm sure a lot of you out there have similar experiences. Speak up now, 
please!

With each new release I get more and more frustrated with D. There's no 
stability! I know you want more and more features, but how can I keep 
using a language like this?

-

I know, I know, report bugs. This doesn't cut it. Reporting bugs is hard 
as hell and time consuming. I need time to report bugs. Now I have to 
either restrict use to specific compiler versions, which people don't 
always know about and report their issues back to me, until I remind them 
they need to downgrade their compiler (which isn't always an option if 
they need bug fixes), or I have to rush to fix my code to workaround such 
issues and report bugs. If there was a stable branch, I could get the code 
working with the unstable branch at a reasonable pace.

-

D 1.0 means nothing. The 1.0 release was a huge flop. I think it could 
have done so much better and retained more users. We need some stability 
and to try the big release one more time. "D 1.1 release 'whoops, got it 
right this time'" (hopefully).

Also, the documentation should probably clearly state differences between 
versions, perhaps even with the words "unstable" near the things not in 
the stable branch. (Safe to ignore 1.0 since it's pointless.)

-

I've had all this in the back of my mind for quite some time and I've 
tried to be patient about it. I'm not trying threaten anyone, but I don't 
know how much longer I'm going to put up with D with its current methods. 
Note that I am probably one of the oldest D users still using it.

-

Thanks for your time.

- Christopher E. Miller

 

回顾D语言走的崎岖之路1

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值