The blurring line between hedge funds and mutual funds.

随着欧洲对共同基金的监管放宽,这些基金开始使用更多衍生品来提高收益,类似于对冲基金的做法。在美国,SEC的规定更为严格,导致大型基金几乎成为标准指数的复制品。通过使用复杂的金融衍生产品,共同基金找到了保护投资组合或寻求更高回报的新途径。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

A recent article from Economist talks about the emerging trend of mutual funds leveraging more and more financial derivatives, just like what hedge funds do, to improve returns.  Especially in Europe, due to sort of deregulation on mutual funds, they are allowed to take risky positions for a small portion of total assets while asking for relatively fair management fees comparing to hedge funds. Yet in USA, SEC still holds the most rigorous rule of the world (Will this reduce the competitive advantages of US market? see another face article) so that large funds are almost clones of S&P500. Due to that restriction, the classical portfolio optimization methodology is almost useless as long as funds holds more than two dozens of stocks. The name of the game is "what to buy" instead of "how much to buy". By using modern sophisticated financial derivatives, mutual funds can find a better way to protect portfolios or to seek higher returns. The just-so-so records of most hedge funds in recent years also make people question about the reasons of high management fees.

After all, we always expect more than what we pay.
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值