What is a reasonable pricing for mobile?

独立IT及电信分析师王峰探讨了中国移动数据服务的定价结构,指出目前收费差距过大,并提出合理的分层计费建议。

Guest column: What is a reasonable pricing structure for mobile data services?

byWang Feng

In the latest Interfax TMT guest column, Wang Feng, an independent IT and telecom analyst, looks at the pricing of mobile data services. He argues that currently, there is too wide a gulf in charging between general packages and those tailored towards heavy users of data services. Translated from the original Chinese by Zhang Danwei.

2009年2月27日 - 王英雄 - 王英雄的博客

Shanghai. February 20. INTERFAX-CHINA - With the release of 3G licenses, operators have begun adjusting their data service fees. China Mobile lowered its basic data fee from RMB 0.03 ($0.0044) per kilobyte (kB) to RMB 0.01 ($0.0015) per kB.

However, some people think that the basic data fee should be lowered even further to RMB 0.001 per kB, while others argue that this is unnecessary, as the pre-paid RMB 5 ($0.73) package that grants a data allowance of 30 megabytes (MBs) per month is not expensive.

What, then, is a reasonable price for data transmission services?

Many people lose a large amount of money when they use WAP services for the first time. A friend of mine once spent more than RMB 90 ($13.17) on downloading a 3 MB song from a WAP site, when data was still charged at RMB 0.03 ($0.0044) per kB. Another friend of mine bought a Blackberry without any promotional service packages, and ended up paying RMB 200 ($29.27) on his first bill for data usage.

Let us look at an example monthly bill for a China Mobile user:

Package fees

WVAS fees

Family Plan package

RMB 10

SMS

6.70

Changyou 08 Business Trip package

RMB 68

GPRS

746.94

WLAN

0.65

Total (after allowances from packages): RMB 486.35

The customer's data usage for the month of December was 35 MB, which cost him RMB 747 ($109.18) before the discounts from his various pre-paid packages kicked in. Even after these discounts were taken into account, he still had to pay RMB 486.35 ($71.18), mostly for data use.

The reason for the heavy charge is that he did not use any pre-paid packages specifically geared towards data services. We can see the difference it would have made to his bill if he had done so.

If the user had subscribed to the RMB 20($2.93)pre-paid data package that includes 50 MB of data use per month, according to my calculation, he would have paid just RMB 6.35 ($0.93) on this bill.

So the user ended up spending an extra RMB 480 ($70.25) just because he did not subscribe to a pre-paid data package.

This means that on a per-kilobyte basis, people who do not use a pre-paid data package pay about 60 times more than those who use the RMB 5 ($0.73) for 30 MB per month package. I think it is unreasonable that the disparity should be so great.

Operators should respect consumer rights and charge all users the same for data usage. An example of a pricing scheme operators could use could be RMB 5 ($0.73) per month for up to 30 MB, RMB 10 ($1.46) per month for between 30 MB to 50 MB and RMB 20 ($2.93) for 50 MB to 100 MB of data flow.

Towards the end of the billing month, operators tend to find that a user's data flow will dip, as the user becomes wary of accidentally exceeding their data allowance. Altering the pricing would change this.

To sum up, my points are:

1. I support reasonable data fee standards, whether that is RMB 5 ($0.73) for 30 MB per month or RMB 10 ($1.46) for 50 MB per month, as long as it suits the telecom market.

2. The difference in charges for those using a data package and those not using one should be smaller. The current difference is in no way acceptable.

3. Operators should develop more means to allow users to easily check the amount of data they have sent and received. Methods could include SMS, service hotlines and online checking. Currently, there is only online checking (although China Mobile's Beijing subsidiary opened a hotline for users to check their data usage in January 2009).

4. The price charged for using more than the monthly data allowance should be reasonable.

5. Anomalies, such as the high cost of downloading a single song, should be addressed. It is not acceptable to charge more than RMB 10 ($1.46) for a 3 MB song.

Wang Feng currently works at real estate exchange Web site Soufun.com where he is responsible for value-added services. He has served as a specialist for the Data Center of China Internet (DCCI). His blog can be found at http://blog.sina.com.cn/wanghero

The above is a personal opinion piece by the author. Its publication in no way implies that Interfax shares the views expressed in the article.

This free article represents just a small proportion ofInterfax'sin-depth China coverage. To gain access to further articles and industry-specific content, please contact our sales staff by telephone (+852 2537 2262) or via ourdirect contact form.

本文是interfax转载并翻译我的文章,中文原文是 我的写 《手机上网的合理资费

内容概要:本文围绕新一代传感器产品在汽车电子电气架构中的关键作用展开分析,重点探讨了智能汽车向高阶智能化演进背景下,传统传感器无法满足感知需求的问题。文章系统阐述了自动驾驶、智能座舱、电动化与网联化三大趋势对传感器技术提出的更高要求,并深入剖析了激光雷达、4D毫米波雷达和3D-ToF摄像头三类核心新型传感器的技术原理、性能优势与现存短板。激光雷达凭借高精度三维点云成为高阶智驾的“眼睛”,4D毫米波雷达通过增加高度维度提升环境感知能力,3D-ToF摄像头则在智能座舱中实现人体姿态识别与交互功能。文章还指出传感器正从单一数据采集向智能决策升级,强调车规级可靠性、多模态融合与成本控制是未来发展方向。; 适合人群:从事汽车电子、智能驾驶、传感器研发等相关领域的工程师和技术管理人员,具备一定专业背景的研发人员;; 使用场景及目标:①理解新一代传感器在智能汽车系统中的定位与技术差异;②掌握激光雷达、4D毫米波雷达、3D-ToF摄像头的核心参数、应用场景及选型依据;③为智能驾驶感知层设计、多传感器融合方案提供理论支持与技术参考; 阅读建议:建议结合实际项目需求对比各类传感器性能指标,关注其在复杂工况下的鲁棒性表现,并重视传感器与整车系统的集成适配问题,同时跟踪芯片化、固态化等技术演进趋势。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值