在使用SimpleDateFormat的经常会有一些错误的用法,例如如下方式:
public class TestDateFormat{
private SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
public void method1(){
sdf.format(new Date());
}
public void method2(){
sdf.format(new Date());
}
)
为了渐少new 的次数而把SimpleDateFormat做成成员或者静态成员,但这样的做法是隐含着错误的,是不
安全的。如下给出证明:
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
public class TestDateFormat{
private SimpleDateFormat sdf ;
public static void main(String[] args) {
SimpleDateFormat sdf= new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
Date date1 = new Date();
Date date2 = new Date(date1.getTime()+1000*60*60*24);
System.out.println(date1);
System.out.println(date2);
Thread thread1 = new Thread(new Thread1(sdf,date1));
thread1.start();
Thread thread2 = new Thread(new Thread2(sdf,date2));
thread2.start();
}
}
class Thread1 implements Runnable{
private SimpleDateFormat sdf;
private Date date;
public Thread1(SimpleDateFormat sdf,Date date){
this.sdf = sdf;
this.date = date;
}
public void run() {
for(;;){
String strDate = sdf.format(date);
if("2007-02-27".equals(strDate)){
System.err.println("Error: date1="+strDate);
System.exit(0);
}
}
}
}
class Thread2 implements Runnable{
private SimpleDateFormat sdf;
private Date date;
public Thread2(SimpleDateFormat sdf,Date date){
this.sdf = sdf;
this.date = date;
}
public void run() {
for(;;){
String strDate = sdf.format(date);
if("2007-02-26".equals(strDate)){
System.err.println("Error: date1="+strDate);
System.exit(0);
}
}
}
}
很快,基本几十次就会出现错误。错误原因:
因为SimpleDateFormat处理复杂,Jdk的实现中使用了成员变量来传递参数,这个就造成在多线程的时候
会出现错误。上边的程序证明了这个问题。
再看看SimpleDateFormat的Jdk 的Source,有这么一段注释,说明它不是线程安全的。
Date formats are not synchronized.
* It is recommended to create separate format instances for each thread.
* If multiple threads access a format concurrently, it must be synchronized
public class TestDateFormat{
private SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
public void method1(){
sdf.format(new Date());
}
public void method2(){
sdf.format(new Date());
}
)
为了渐少new 的次数而把SimpleDateFormat做成成员或者静态成员,但这样的做法是隐含着错误的,是不
安全的。如下给出证明:
import java.text.SimpleDateFormat;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
public class TestDateFormat{
private SimpleDateFormat sdf ;
public static void main(String[] args) {
SimpleDateFormat sdf= new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd");
Date date1 = new Date();
Date date2 = new Date(date1.getTime()+1000*60*60*24);
System.out.println(date1);
System.out.println(date2);
Thread thread1 = new Thread(new Thread1(sdf,date1));
thread1.start();
Thread thread2 = new Thread(new Thread2(sdf,date2));
thread2.start();
}
}
class Thread1 implements Runnable{
private SimpleDateFormat sdf;
private Date date;
public Thread1(SimpleDateFormat sdf,Date date){
this.sdf = sdf;
this.date = date;
}
public void run() {
for(;;){
String strDate = sdf.format(date);
if("2007-02-27".equals(strDate)){
System.err.println("Error: date1="+strDate);
System.exit(0);
}
}
}
}
class Thread2 implements Runnable{
private SimpleDateFormat sdf;
private Date date;
public Thread2(SimpleDateFormat sdf,Date date){
this.sdf = sdf;
this.date = date;
}
public void run() {
for(;;){
String strDate = sdf.format(date);
if("2007-02-26".equals(strDate)){
System.err.println("Error: date1="+strDate);
System.exit(0);
}
}
}
}
很快,基本几十次就会出现错误。错误原因:
因为SimpleDateFormat处理复杂,Jdk的实现中使用了成员变量来传递参数,这个就造成在多线程的时候
会出现错误。上边的程序证明了这个问题。
再看看SimpleDateFormat的Jdk 的Source,有这么一段注释,说明它不是线程安全的。
Date formats are not synchronized.
* It is recommended to create separate format instances for each thread.
* If multiple threads access a format concurrently, it must be synchronized