Microsoft Takes Write-Down in Failed Digital Ad Foray

微软宣布对其在线服务部门进行62亿美元的会计减记,主要源于2007年收购的aQuantive表现不佳。此次减记几乎抹去了微软第四季度的全部利润。
Microsoft owned up on Monday to the collapse of its biggest push into digital advertising, announcing that it would take a $6.2 billion accounting charge in its online services division for a failed acquisition.

The accounting charge, called a write-down of good will, was essentially a write-off of the value of aQuantive, a digital advertising company that Microsoft bought in 2007. It will effectively wipe out Microsoft’s fourth-quarter profit.

The company said it took the write-down because “expectations for future growth and profitability are lower than previous estimates” for the online services unit.

The charge will not affect the online services division’s operations or financial performance, Microsoft said.

“It’s disappointing, but it is not a shock at this point,” said Brendan Barnicle, senior research analyst at Pacific Crest Securities. “The industry has evolved beyond where aQuantive was when Microsoft bought it.”

Microsoft does make money in online advertising, but has relied on a number of digital advertising partnerships.

The deal for aQuantive was struck when technology and traditional advertising firms were desperately seeking footholds in the world of Internet display advertising. At the time, aQuantive was the biggest company Microsoft had bought in its history.
A month before the aQuantive acquisition, Google, Microsoft’s big rival in online advertising, purchased a similar firm, DoubleClick, for $3.1 billion. That deal has been highly profitable for Google, analysts say.

The purchase of aQuantive may well have been driven by pressure Microsoft was feeling at the time, not only from the DoubleClick deal, but by similar acquisitions by other companies. Microsoft bought aQuantive one day after the WPP Group bought 24/7 Real Media, another digital advertising company, for $649 million, and a month after Yahoo agreed to pay $680 million for Right Media, an online ad exchange.

All of the acquisitions were in one or another part of the display advertising business across the Web. Once highly profitable by indiscriminately pasting digital ads across the borders of millions of Web pages, the business has become under pressure as companies like Google got better at aiming for individual tastes with search advertising.

With DoubleClick, Google appeared to be using that personalization technology for the placement of banners and other display advertising.

Google used DoubleClick’s huge inventory of Web ads inside AdSense, Google’s self-serve ad placement technology for third-party Web sites.

AQuantive was a well-respected online agency based in Seattle, but its focus was on design and client services. The company did have ad inventory and an ad placement engine similar to DoubleClick’s at the time, but Microsoft did little to update it.

“It could have been another DoubleClick, but they would have had to know a business where publishers and advertisers meet, and then invest heavily,” said Todd Sawicki, chief revenue officer at Cheezburger, a publisher of several popular Web sites.

“Microsoft bought aQuantive in a reactionary move to Google buying DoubleClick, thinking that ad serving was its core strength,” he added. “Then they woke up the next morning and realized what they had.”

Brian McAndrews, the chief executive of aQuantive, was promoted to head Microsoft’s publisher and advertising group in August 2007, but left the company in December 2008. Now a venture partner with the Madrona Venture Group, Mr. McAndrews was recently elected to the board of The New York Times Company.

The poor performance of aQuantive has not hurt other parts of Microsoft’s online ad business. The company’s Bing search engine has grown, as has its revenue per search. Microsoft has struck a number of partnerships, including with Yahoo, WPP and App Nexus, which does real-time ad placement.

In May 2011 Microsoft paid $8.1 billion for the communications company Skype, its biggest purchase, and one that is thought to be going well for Microsoft.

Microsoft still has some innovative ad technology products, said Darren Herman, chief digital media officer at the Media Kitchen, a digital advertising agency. It may be using some of its partnerships to learn more about the online ad business as a prelude to an actual purchase, he said.

“There are a lot of people that think that Microsoft and App Nexus are going to link up,” Mr. Herman said. “It’s just a matter of when, not if.” Nonetheless, the end of possible competitor to Google’s DoubleClick ad placement engine left some even outside Microsoft feeling the sting.

“AOL has a small ad engine, and so does 24/7, but for ad placement it’s really DoubleClick or bust,” said Mr. Sawicki. “It’s a phenomenal failure.”
基于遗传算法的微电网调度(风、光、蓄电池、微型燃气轮机)(Matlab代码实现)内容概要:本文档介绍了基于遗传算法的微电网调度模型,涵盖风能、太阳能、蓄电池和微型燃气轮机等多种能源形式,并通过Matlab代码实现系统优化调度。该模型旨在解决微电网中多能源协调运行的问题,优化能源分配,降低运行成本,提高可再生能源利用率,同时考虑系统稳定性与经济性。文中详细阐述了遗传算法在求解微电网多目标优化问题中的应用,包括编码方式、适应度函数设计、约束处理及算法流程,并提供了完整的仿真代码供复现与学习。此外,文档还列举了大量相关电力系统优化案例,如负荷预测、储能配置、潮流计算等,展示了广泛的应用背景和技术支撑。; 适合人群:具备一定电力系统基础知识和Matlab编程能力的研究生、科研人员及从事微电网、智能电网优化研究的工程技术人员。; 使用场景及目标:①学习遗传算法在微电网调度中的具体实现方法;②掌握多能源系统建模与优化调度的技术路线;③为科研项目、毕业设计或实际工程提供可复用的代码框架与算法参考; 阅读建议:建议结合Matlab代码逐段理解算法实现细节,重点关注目标函数构建与约束条件处理,同时可参考文档中提供的其他优化案例进行拓展学习,以提升综合应用能力。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值