I've been looking at Go. It's interesting, but a bit of a mess --- it
looks like the language grew organically rather than was designed.------David Given
Anyway, from what I can learn from there website, the language is very promising.-----Cheng, Long
+1, that's good! New languages are fun, but often they're 'one trick
ponies' (like Snobol in the 60s was very good at string matching, but
it lost its niche eventually)
Concurrency is where the action is ... but do we need a new language for that?------steve donovan
以下是我的看法,
从语法和设计层面Go无疑是Lua的可编译版本,但是,其设计上完全违背了Lua的设计思想。
显得杂乱无章,尤其是内存模型和并发模型的设计上,基本是脚踩西瓜皮,滑到哪里算哪里。
可用性评估,完全没有可用性。
继续观察,待2.0版本。