ServletRequest.getRequestDispatcher() and ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher()

本文对比了ServletRequest与ServletContext接口中getRequestDispatcher方法的区别。前者可以接受相对路径,而后者仅能接受相对于当前上下文根的绝对路径。此外,还介绍了如何通过ServletContext的方法访问其他上下文中的资源。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

The difference between ServletRequest.getRequestDispatcher(String path) and ServletContext.getRequestDispatcher(String path) is that the former can accept a relative path as well whereas the latter can accept paths relative to the current context root only.

If the path starts with a ‘/’ in the getRequestDispatcher(String path) of the ServletRequest interface then it’s interpreted as being relative to the current context root otherwise it’ll be a relative to the request of the calling servlet. Whereas, the path of the getRequestDispatcher(String path) of the ServletContext interface must start with ‘/’ only – being relative to the current context root.

Another difference between the two is that path of the getRequestDispatche(String path) of the ServletRequest interface cannot extend outside the current servlet context whereas getRequestDispatcher(String path) of the ServletContext can use the getContext(String uripath) method to obtain RequestDispatcher for resources in foreign contexts.

评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值