Easysearch VS Opensearch 数据写入与存储性能对比

最新推荐文章于 2025-05-30 23:25:14 发布

原创最新推荐文章于 2025-05-30 23:25:14 发布 · 463 阅读

3 ·

CC 4.0 BY-SA版权

文章标签：

#Easysearch #Opensearch

本文记录 Easysearch 和 Opensearch 数据写入和数据存储方面的性能对比。

准备

压测工具：INFINI Loadgen
对比版本：

Easysearch 1.11.1（lucene 8.11.4）
Opensearch 2.19.1（lucene 9.12.1）

节点 JVM 配置：1G

数据写入

压测命令：

./loadgen-linux-amd64 -c 20 -d 300

Opensearch

PUT infinilabs
{
  "settings": {
    "number_of_shards": "1",
    "number_of_replicas": 0,
    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",
    "translog": {
      "durability": "async",
      "sync_interval": "120s"
    }
  }
}

Easysearch

PUT infinilabs
{
  "settings": {
    "number_of_shards": "1",
    "number_of_replicas": 0,
    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",
    "translog": {
      "durability": "async",
      "sync_interval": "120s"
    }
  }
}

数据存储

压测命令：

./loadgen-linux-amd64 -c 20 -d 600 -l 10000

Opensearch: zstd 压缩

PUT infinilabs
{
  "settings": {
    "number_of_shards": "1",
    "number_of_replicas": 0,
    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",
    "translog": {
      "durability": "async",
      "sync_interval": "120s"
    },
    "index.codec": "zstd"
  }
}

Easysearch: zstd + source_reuse 压缩

PUT infinilabs
{
  "settings": {
    "number_of_shards": "1",
    "number_of_replicas": 0,
    "index.refresh_interval": "120s",
    "translog": {
      "durability": "async",
      "sync_interval": "120s"
    },
    "index.codec": "ZSTD",
    "index.source_reuse": "true"
  }
}