意图:动态地(组合)给一个对象添加一些额外的职责,就增加功能来说,Decorator模式相比生成子类更为灵活(消除重复代码,减少子类 数量)。
在某些情况下我们可能会“过度地使用继承来扩展对象的功能”,由于继承为类型引入的静态特质,使得这种扩展方式缺乏灵活性;并且随着子类的增多(扩展功能的增多),各种子类的组合(扩展功能的组合)会导致更多子类的膨胀。
看下面的代码:
//代码在重复
class Stream
{
public:
virtual char Read() = 0;
virtual void Write() = 0;
virtual ~Stream() {}
};
//主体类
class FileStream :public Stream
{
public:
virtual char Read()
{
//...
}
virtual void Write()
{
//...
}
};
//主体类
class NetworkStream :public Stream
{
public:
virtual char Read()
{
//...
}
virtual void Write()
{
//...
}
};
class CryptoFileStream :public FileStream
{
public:
virtual char Read()
{
//额外的操作
FileStream::Read();
}
virtual void Write()
{
//额外的操作
FileStream::Write();
}
};
class CryptoNetworkStream :public NetworkStream
{
public:
virtual char Read()
{
//额外的操作
NetworkStream::Read();
}
virtual void Write()
{
//额外的操作
NetworkStream::Write();
}
};
class CryptoButteredFileStream :public FileStream
{
public:
virtual char Read()
{
//额外的加密操作
//额外的缓冲操作
FileStream::Read();
}
virtual void Write()
{
//额外的加密操作
//额外的缓冲操作
FileStream::Write();
}
};
假如要扩展,那只能导致类越来越多,代码也会有很多重复。
修改如下:
//组合的方式
class Stream
{
public:
virtual char Read() = 0;
virtual void Write() = 0;
virtual ~Stream() {}
};
class FileStream :public Stream
{
public:
virtual char Read()
{
//...
}
virtual void Write()
{
//...
}
};
class NetworkStream
{
Stream* stream;
public:
virtual char Read()
{
//...
}
virtual void Write()
{
//...
}
};
//既有基类成员,又继承基类
class CryptoStream:public DecoratorStream
{
// Stream* stream;//=new FileStream();
public:
CryptoStream(Stream* s) :DecoratorStream(s) {};
virtual char Read()
{
//额外的操作
stream->Read();
}
virtual void Write()
{
//额外的操作
stream->Write();
}
};
//装饰类
class DecoratorStream : public Stream
{
protected:
Stream* stream;
public:
DecoratorStream(Stream *s) :stream(s) {};
};
void Process()
{
//通过装配来构造
FileStream *fileStream = new FileStream();
CryptoStream* cryptoFileStream = new CryptoStream(fileStream);
}
以组合的方式代替继承的方式的典型。