3.4 Git Branching - Branching Workflows

本文介绍Git中长运行分支和主题分支的工作流程,展示了如何利用轻量级分支进行稳定的代码迭代及特性开发,包括分支创建、合并及删除的过程。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

Branching Workflows

Now that you have the basics of branching and merging down, what can or should you do with them?In this section, we’ll cover some common workflows that this lightweight branching makes possible, so you can decide if you would like to incorporate it into your own development cycle.

Long-Running Branches

Because Git uses a simple three-way merge, merging from one branch into another multiple times over a long period is generally easy to do.This means you can have several branches that are always open and that you use for different stages of your development cycle; you can merge regularly from some of them into others.

Many Git developers have a workflow that embraces this approach, such as having only code that is entirely stable in their master branch – possibly only code that has been or will be released.They have another parallel branch named develop or next that they work from or use to test stability – it isn’t necessarily always stable, but whenever it gets to a stable state, it can be merged into master.It’s used to pull in topic branches (short-lived branches, like your earlier iss53 branch) when they’re ready, to make sure they pass all the tests and don’t introduce bugs.

In reality, we’re talking about pointers moving up the line of commits you’re making.The stable branches are farther down the line in your commit history, and the bleeding-edge branches are farther up the history.

A linear view of progressive-stability branching.
Figure 26. A linear view of progressive-stability branching

It’s generally easier to think about them as work silos, where sets of commits graduate to a more stable silo when they’re fully tested.

A ``silo'' view of progressive-stability branching.
Figure 27. A “silo” view of progressive-stability branching

You can keep doing this for several levels of stability.Some larger projects also have a proposed or pu (proposed updates) branch that has integrated branches that may not be ready to go into the next or master branch.The idea is that your branches are at various levels of stability; when they reach a more stable level, they’re merged into the branch above them.Again, having multiple long-running branches isn’t necessary, but it’s often helpful, especially when you’re dealing with very large or complex projects.

Topic Branches

Topic branches, however, are useful in projects of any size.A topic branch is a short-lived branch that you create and use for a single particular feature or related work.This is something you’ve likely never done with a VCS before because it’s generally too expensive to create and merge branches.But in Git it’s common to create, work on, merge, and delete branches several times a day.

You saw this in the last section with the iss53 and hotfix branches you created.You did a few commits on them and deleted them directly after merging them into your main branch.This technique allows you to context-switch quickly and completely – because your work is separated into silos where all the changes in that branch have to do with that topic, it’s easier to see what has happened during code review and such.You can keep the changes there for minutes, days, or months, and merge them in when they’re ready, regardless of the order in which they were created or worked on.

Consider an example of doing some work (on master), branching off for an issue (iss91), working on it for a bit, branching off the second branch to try another way of handling the same thing (iss91v2), going back to your master branch and working there for a while, and then branching off there to do some work that you’re not sure is a good idea (dumbidea branch).Your commit history will look something like this:

Multiple topic branches.
Figure 28. Multiple topic branches

Now, let’s say you decide you like the second solution to your issue best (iss91v2); and you showed the dumbidea branch to your coworkers, and it turns out to be genius.You can throw away the original iss91 branch (losing commits C5 and C6) and merge in the other two.Your history then looks like this:

History after merging `dumbidea` and `iss91v2`.
Figure 29. History after merging dumbidea and iss91v2

We will go into more detail about the various possible workflows for your Git project in Distributed Git, so before you decide which branching scheme your next project will use, be sure to read that chapter.

It’s important to remember when you’re doing all this that these branches are completely local.When you’re branching and merging, everything is being done only in your Git repository – no server communication is happening.

内容概要:本文详细探讨了基于阻尼连续可调减振器(CDC)的半主动悬架系统的控制策略。首先建立了CDC减振器的动力学模型,验证了其阻尼特性,并通过实验确认了模型的准确性。接着,搭建了1/4车辆悬架模型,分析了不同阻尼系数对悬架性能的影响。随后,引入了PID、自适应模糊PID和模糊-PID并联三种控制策略,通过仿真比较它们的性能提升效果。研究表明,模糊-PID并联控制能最优地提升悬架综合性能,在平顺性和稳定性间取得最佳平衡。此外,还深入分析了CDC减振器的特性,优化了控制策略,并进行了系统级验证。 适用人群:从事汽车工程、机械工程及相关领域的研究人员和技术人员,尤其是对车辆悬架系统和控制策略感兴趣的读者。 使用场景及目标:①适用于研究和开发基于CDC减振器的半主动悬架系统的工程师;②帮助理解不同控制策略(如PID、模糊PID、模糊-PID并联)在悬架系统中的应用及其性能差异;③为优化车辆行驶舒适性和稳定性提供理论依据和技术支持。 其他说明:本文不仅提供了详细的数学模型和仿真代码,还通过实验数据验证了模型的准确性。对于希望深入了解CDC减振器工作原理及其控制策略的读者来说,本文是一份极具价值的参考资料。同时,文中还介绍了多种控制策略的具体实现方法及其优缺点,为后续的研究和实际应用提供了有益的借鉴。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值