一片把SWT批判的体无完肤的文章

SWT与Swing对比分析
本文通过亲身体验探讨了SWT与Swing在Java界面开发中的优劣。指出选择SWT需考虑其平台忠实度、开发人员技能匹配度、与Eclipse平台的耦合度及跨平台性能等问题。

http://www.hacknot.info/hacknot/action/showEntry?eid=74

作者通过亲身体验告诉你SWT对于开发者来说到底以为着这什么。

以下是作者的结论,选取swt时候需要考虑的因素

If you are developing a rich interface in Java, and considering both SWT and Swing,  consider the following issues:

  • If you believe that the greater platform fidelity of SWT will make for a more usable application, what actual evidence do you have to support that conclusion? Have you put examples of both in front of your user population and gathered feedback? (没有理由相信swt是成熟高效的平台)
  • It's hard to find good GUI developers. Finding good GUI developers with SWT skills is even harder. Where are you going to find the staff to develop your GUI in SWT? If you anticipate getting Swing developers to cross-train in SWT, get ready for staff turnover. Taking a Swing developer and giving them SWT is like taking someone used to riding a Harley Davidson and giving them a Vespa motor scooter. They're not likely to be delighted. My current workplace has already lost one developer this way. (swt的开发曲线很高,缺少这样的程序员,或者培训成本高)
  • How close is your target GUI to the Eclipse GUI? Be aware that every time you step even a little way beyond the functional demands of Eclipse, you are on your own. You will likely have to start writing custom widgets in order to get the behavior you want. Can your organization justify spending time and money writing widgets that in Swing, would be available off the shelf? (和eclipse平台耦合紧密)
  • Due to the bugs and shortcomings in SWT, your developers will be working with a lowered productivity, and so you should expect project delays and/or increased resource requirements. Can your organization justify this extra investment? (swt的缺陷太多,没有经历时间检验)
  • Before deciding that Swing applications are slow and ugly, take the time to look at products like Netbeans or any of those listed at the Swing Sightings site. I have heard people voice these opinions, having not looked at Swing since the days of AWT. (Netbean展示了swing的成熟和高效)
  • Is your source of information about SWT the blogs and sideline comments of novice GUI developers, or those who have had only a fleeting encounter with SWT. Let me suggest you subscribe to the SWT newsgroup1 and mailing list 2 where you will get the perspective of those who have been struggling with it for a longer period of time, and are past that initial phase of blind enthusiasm. (看看swt程序员们的痛苦挣扎吧)
  • Is consistent cross-platform performance important to you? This might lead you away from SWT, as it appears to be experiencing real performance issues on some non-Windows platforms. (swt跨平台有性能问题)


Trackback: http://tb.blog.youkuaiyun.com/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=366276


【电动汽车充电站有序充电调度的分散式优化】基于蒙特卡诺和拉格朗日的电动汽车优化调度(分时电价调度)(Matlab代码实现)内容概要:本文介绍了基于蒙特卡洛和拉格朗日方法的电动汽车充电站有序充电调度优化方案,重点在于采用分散式优化策略应对分时电价机制下的充电需求管理。通过构建数学模型,结合不确定性因素如用户充电行为和电网负荷波动,利用蒙特卡洛模拟生成大量场景,并运用拉格朗日松弛法对复杂问题进行分解求解,从而实现全局最优或近似最优的充电调度计划。该方法有效降低了电网峰值负荷压力,提升了充电站运营效率与经济效益,同时兼顾用户充电便利性。 适合人群:具备一定电力系统、优化算法和Matlab编程基础的高校研究生、科研人员及从事智能电网、电动汽车相关领域的工程技术人员。 使用场景及目标:①应用于电动汽车充电站的日常运营管理,优化充电负荷分布;②服务于城市智能交通系统规划,提升电网与交通系统的协同水平;③作为学术研究案例,用于验证分散式优化算法在复杂能源系统中的有效性。 阅读建议:建议读者结合Matlab代码实现部分,深入理解蒙特卡洛模拟与拉格朗日松弛法的具体实施步骤,重点关注场景生成、约束处理与迭代收敛过程,以便在实际项目中灵活应用与改进。
评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值