博客提及系统的标准和API稳定性，指出其并非完全面向对象，但设计实用，对用户和IDE友好。还强调了该系统能与Struts、纯JSP等遗留系统实现互操作性，而Tapistry因纯面向对象设计无法实现。
1. standard
2. api stablity relatedly
3. not oo entirely, but it is not required, it have practicable designed, to user, to ide, but tapistry is not
4. inter-operablity with lecagy system, e.g. struts, pure jsp system, but tapistry is not because its pure oo design
扫一扫
5398
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
