0102 Processing 3xx Responses

本文探讨了SIP协议中重定向请求的工作原理,包括如何处理重定向响应、客户端如何生成新的请求到不同URI地址的过程,以及如何避免无限重定向循环等问题。文中还介绍了在重定向过程中对原有请求头部字段的更新策略。

 

Any new request may receive 3xx responses themselves containing

      the original URI as a contact.  Two locations can be configured to

      redirect to each other.  Placing any given URI in the target set

      only once prevents infinite redirection loops.

 

   As the target set grows, the client MAY generate new requests to the

   URIs in any order.  A common mechanism is to order the set by the "q"

   parameter value from the Contact header field value.  Requests to the

   URIs MAY be generated serially or in parallel.  One approach is to

   process groups of decreasing q-values serially and process the URIs

   in each q-value group in parallel.  Another is to perform only serial

   processing in decreasing q-value order, arbitrarily choosing between

   contacts of equal q-value.

 

   If contacting an address in the list results in a failure, as defined

   in the next paragraph, the element moves to the next address in the

   list, until the list is exhausted.  If the list is exhausted, then

   the request has failed.

Note that in some instances, header fields that have been

   communicated in the contact address may instead append to existing

   request header fields in the original redirected request.  As a

   general rule, if the header field can accept a comma-separated list

   of values, then the new header field value MAY be appended to any

   existing values in the original redirected request.  If the header

   field does not accept multiple values, the value in the original

   redirected request MAY be overwritten by the header field value

   communicated in the contact address.  For example, if a contact

   address is returned with the following value:

 

      sip:user@host?Subject=foo&Call-Info=<http://www.foo.com>

 

   Then any Subject header field in the original redirected request is

   overwritten, but the HTTP URL is merely appended to any existing

   Call-Info header field values.

 

   It is RECOMMENDED that the UAC reuse the same To, From, and Call-ID

   used in the original redirected request, but the UAC MAY also choose

   to update the Call-ID header field value for new requests, for

   example.

 

   Finally, once the new request has been constructed, it is sent using

   a new client transaction, and therefore MUST have a new branch ID in

   the top Via field as discussed in Section 8.1.1.7.

<think>Hmm, the user is asking about the programmability features of the Prestera 98DX35xx device, specifically highlighting its PHA and PPU engines. From the technical descriptions provided earlier about tunneling and interfaces, it appears they&#39;re diving deeper into the chip&#39;s flexible packet processing capabilities. Looking at the context, this seems to be a networking professional exploring advanced programmability aspects. The mention of SRv6 and INT suggests they&#39;re working with modern architectures - probably in cloud or service provider environments. I should focus on the operational significance rather than just listing features. The query emphasizes future-proofing through non-standard protocol support, which tells me the user values adaptability. They might be evaluating this chip for long-term infrastructure investments. The previous questions about VXLAN and QoS indicate they care about real-world implementation challenges too. For the response structure, I&#39;ll need to: 1) Explain how PHA/PPU enable customization beyond fixed-function ASICs 2) Highlight specific use cases like SRv6 header manipulation 3) Maintain technical precision while avoiding vendor jargon overload The follow-up questions should probe deployment pain points: performance trade-offs between flexibility and speed, integration challenges with legacy systems, and scalability under load. The zero-trust angle from their first question suggests security concerns too - maybe include a question about P4 program verification. Noticing they consistently request Chinese responses despite providing English inputs... interesting. Probably an international team where documentation needs bilingual handling. Must ensure all terminology has accurate Chinese equivalents. </think>Prestera® 98DX35xx系列的可编程报文处理技术解析: 该芯片通过**可编程报文头改写引擎(PHA)**和**可编程解析单元(PPU)**实现深度报文处理定制化: 1. **协议扩展能力** - PPU支持深度协议解析(最大解析深度256字节),可自定义私有协议字段结构 - 动态加载解析模板,兼容Geneve/SRv6等可变长头部 2. **实时报文修改** - PHA提供32级流水线操作,支持MPLS标签栈压入/弹出、SRv6 SID修改 - 硬件级INT(带内遥测)数据注入能力,时延<500ns 3. **业务场景适配** ```python # PPU自定义协议解析示例(伪代码) protocol_custom = PPU_Engine( header_type = "PROPRIETARY", field_map = [("flag", 4), ("seq", 16), ("payload", 0)], # 位域定义 next_proto = {"0x01": "IPv4", "0x02": "VXLAN"} # 下一跳类型映射 ) ``` 4. **性能保障机制** - 并行处理引擎确保100G线速下支持12级MPLS标签操作 - 硬件TCAM实现300万条流表项的协议匹配 典型应用: - 5G UPF的用户面报文重标记 - 云原生网络的服务链头封装 - 金融交易网络定制化时延测量
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值