E-Label 声明

 

最近发现有人用测试程序并谎称是我的合作人员,来进行欺骗行为特此声明:

      本软件由本人(徐春晓)一人开发,无其它合作人员和单位,如需购买请联系:

      QQ:9658258

     MSN:chunxiaodyl@hotmail.com

     TEL:13773155723(苏州)

Collecting ultralytics Using cached https://pypi.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn/packages/e7/32/f57d9508676578e170dcf559c6fc02b4f716a9968948925a9eb1944e8578/ultralytics-8.3.221-py3-none-any.whl (1.1 MB) ERROR: Cannot install label-studio==0.4.1, label-studio==0.4.2, label-studio==0.4.3, label-studio==0.4.4, label-studio==0.4.4.post1, label-studio==0.4.4.post2, label-studio==0.4.5, label-studio==0.4.6, label-studio==0.4.6.post1, label-studio==0.4.6.post2, label-studio==0.4.7, label-studio==0.4.8, label-studio==0.5.0, label-studio==0.5.1, label-studio==0.6.0, label-studio==0.6.1, label-studio==0.7.0, label-studio==0.7.1, label-studio==0.7.2, label-studio==0.7.3, label-studio==0.7.4, label-studio==0.7.4.post0, label-studio==0.7.4.post1, label-studio==0.7.5.post1, label-studio==0.7.5.post2, label-studio==0.8.0, label-studio==0.8.0.post0, label-studio==0.8.1, label-studio==0.8.1.post0, label-studio==0.8.2, label-studio==0.8.2.post0, label-studio==1.0.0, label-studio==1.0.0.post0, label-studio==1.0.0.post1, label-studio==1.0.0.post2, label-studio==1.0.0.post3, label-studio==1.0.1, label-studio==1.0.2, label-studio==1.0.2.post0, label-studio==1.1.0, label-studio==1.1.1, label-studio==1.10.0, label-studio==1.10.0.post0, label-studio==1.10.1, label-studio==1.11.0, label-studio==1.12.0, label-studio==1.12.0.post0, label-studio==1.12.1, label-studio==1.13.0, label-studio==1.13.1, label-studio==1.14.0, label-studio==1.14.0.post0, label-studio==1.15.0, label-studio==1.16.0, label-studio==1.17.0, label-studio==1.18.0, label-studio==1.19.0, label-studio==1.2, label-studio==1.20.0, label-studio==1.21.0, label-studio==1.3, label-studio==1.3.post0, label-studio==1.3.post1, label-studio==1.4, label-studio==1.4.1.post1, label-studio==1.5.0, label-studio==1.5.0.post0, label-studio==1.6.0, label-studio==1.7.0, label-studio==1.7.1, label-studio==1.7.2, label-studio==1.7.3, label-studio==1.8.0, label-studio==1.8.1, label-studio==1.8.2, label-studio==1.8.2.post0, label-studio==1.8.2.post1, label-studio==1.9.0, label-studio==1.9.1, label-studio==1.9.1.post0, label-studio==1.9.2 and label-studio==1.9.2.post0 because these package versions have conflicting dependencies. The conflict is caused by: label-studio 1.21.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.20.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.19.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.18.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.17.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.16.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.15.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.14.0.post0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.14.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.13.1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.13.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.12.1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.12.0.post0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.12.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.11.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.10.1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.10.0.post0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.10.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.9.2.post0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.9.2 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.9.1.post0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.9.1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.9.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.8.2.post1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.8.2.post0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.8.2 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.8.1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.8.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.7.3 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.7.2 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.7.1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.7.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.6.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.5.0.post0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.5.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.4.1.post1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.4 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.3.post1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.3.post0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.3 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.2 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.1.1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.1.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.0.2.post0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.0.2 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.0.1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.0.0.post3 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.0.0.post2 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.0.0.post1 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.0.0.post0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 1.0.0 depends on attr==0.3.1 label-studio 0.8.2.post0 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.8.2 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.8.1.post0 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.8.1 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.8.0.post0 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.8.0 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.7.5.post2 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.7.5.post1 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.7.4.post1 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.7.4.post0 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.7.4 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.7.3 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.7.2 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.7.1 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.7.0 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.6.1 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.6.0 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.5.1 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.5.0 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.4.8 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.4.7 depends on blis==0.4.1 label-studio 0.4.6.post2 depends on blis==0.2.4 label-studio 0.4.6.post1 depends on blis==0.2.4 label-studio 0.4.6 depends on blis==0.2.4 label-studio 0.4.5 depends on blis==0.2.4 label-studio 0.4.4.post2 depends on blis==0.2.4 label-studio 0.4.4.post1 depends on blis==0.2.4 label-studio 0.4.4 depends on blis==0.2.4 label-studio 0.4.3 depends on blis==0.2.4 label-studio 0.4.2 depends on blis==0.2.4 label-studio 0.4.1 depends on blis==0.2.4 Additionally, some packages in these conflicts have no matching distributions available for your environment: attr blis To fix this you could try to: 1. loosen the range of package versions you've specified 2. remove package versions to allow pip to attempt to solve the dependency conflict ERROR: ResolutionImpossible: for help visit https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/topics/dependency-resolution/#dealing-with-dependency-conflicts
10-31
<think> Hmm, the user is asking about the specific purpose of the aria-label attribute in HTML button tags, after providing several references about ARIA roles and semantic HTML. Let me parse this carefully. First, looking at the citation [^1], it clearly explains that ARIA attributes provide contextual information for assistive technologies when non-standard elements are used. The example given with role="checkbox" is particularly relevant here. The user's core question seems to be about aria-label specifically for button elements. From my knowledge, this attribute serves as an invisible label that screen readers will announce instead of relying on visual text content. This is crucial when: - Buttons use only icons without text (like a trash can icon for delete) - The visible text is insufficient for context (e.g. a button just saying "OK") - There are multiple identical buttons needing distinction ("Add to cart" repeated for each product) Citation [^2] about semantic HTML is also relevant because while native <button> tags are inherently semantic, aria-label enhances their accessibility when the visual design might compromise clarity. I notice the user included citation [^4] about button states too - while not directly about aria-label, it shows they're researching button attributes thoroughly. The answer should emphasize that aria-label doesn't change visual appearance but bridges the gap for screen reader users. Examples would help - like contrasting a button with only a magnifying glass icon versus one with proper aria-label="Search". Also worth mentioning that for standard text buttons (e.g. <button>Submit</button>), aria-label is usually unnecessary unless the text lacks context. Overuse can actually create noise for assistive tech users. </think> HTML `button` 标签中的 `aria-label` 属性是 **为辅助技术(如屏幕阅读器)提供明确语义标签** 的关键属性,主要用于以下场景: ### 核心作用 1. **补充视觉信息缺失** 当按钮仅有图标(无可见文本)时,例如: ```html <button aria-label="搜索">🔍</button> ``` 屏幕阅读器会朗读 "搜索" 而非 "放大镜图标",明确功能语义[^1][^2]。 2. **覆盖默认语义** 修复浏览器对复杂元素的误读: ```html <button aria-label="关闭弹窗">X</button> <!-- 避免屏幕阅读器读出"X" --> ``` 3. **消除歧义** 区分相同视觉表现的不同功能按钮: ```html <button aria-label="删除邮件">🗑️</button> <button aria-label="清空回收站">🗑️</button> ``` ### 工作原理解析 | 场景 | 无 `aria-label` | 有 `aria-label` | |-----------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------| | 图标按钮(搜索) | 读出:"按钮" 或 "🔍" | 读出:"搜索按钮" | | 图形按钮(关闭) | 读出:"X按钮" | 读出:"关闭按钮" | | 自定义按钮组件 | 可能无法识别功能 | 明确传递语义角色[^1] | ### 最佳实践 1. **优先使用原生语义** 带可见文本的按钮无需添加: ```html <button>提交表单</button> <!-- 无需 aria-label --> ``` 2. **图标按钮必须搭配** ```html <button aria-label="打印文档">🖨️</button> ``` 3. **避免冗余** 不与 `title` 属性重复声明: ```diff - <button title="返回" aria-label="返回">←</button> + <button aria-label="返回">←</button> ``` > 该属性遵循 WAI-ARIA 标准,是构建无障碍 Web 应用的核心技术,确保视障用户能准确理解界面功能[^1][^2]。实际开发中需配合 `role` 属性增强非标准元素的语义(如用 `div` 模拟按钮)。 *** ### 相关问题 1. 如何为 `<div>` 模拟的按钮添加无障碍支持? 2. `aria-label` 和 `aria-labelledby` 有何区别? 3. 哪些 HTML 元素默认具备语义?如何查看元素的语义树? 4. 移动端开发中如何处理触摸按钮的无障碍标签? [^1]: ARIA 属性为非标准元素提供语义化支持 [^2]: HTML5 原生语义元素与 ARIA 的互补关系 [^4]: 按钮交互状态与 ARIA 属性的关联实现
评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值