Java Reflection - Dynamic Proxies

Java动态代理详解
本文介绍如何使用Java反射创建动态代理实现接口的动态实例,并探讨其在数据库连接与事务管理、单元测试动态模拟对象、依赖注入容器适配及AOP方法拦截等方面的应用。

http://tutorials.jenkov.com/java-reflection/dynamic-proxies.html


Using Java Reflection you create dynamic implementations of interfaces at runtime. You do so using the classjava.lang.reflect.Proxy. The name of this class is why I refer to these dynamic interface implementations as dynamic proxies. Dynamic proxies can be used for many different purposes, e.g. database connection and transaction management, dynamic mock objects for unit testing, and other AOP-like method intercepting purposes.

Creating Proxies

You create dynamic proxies using the Proxy.newProxyInstance() method. The newProxyInstance()methods takes 3 parameters:

  1. The ClassLoader that is to "load" the dynamic proxy class.
  2. An array of interfaces to implement.
  3. An InvocationHandler to forward all methods calls on the proxy to.

Here is an example:

InvocationHandler handler = new MyInvocationHandler();
MyInterface proxy = (MyInterface) Proxy.newProxyInstance(
                            MyInterface.class.getClassLoader(),
                            new Class[] { MyInterface.class },
                            handler);

After running this code the proxy variable contains a dynamic implementation of the MyInterface interface. All calls to the proxy will be forwarded to the handler implementation of the general InvocationHandlerinterface. InvocationHandler's are covered i the next section.

InvocationHandler's

As mentioned earlier you must pass an InvocationHandler implementation to theProxy.newProxyInstance() method. All method calls to the dynamic proxy are forwarded to thisInvocationHandler implementation. Here is how the InvocationHandler interface looks:

public interface InvocationHandler{
  Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args)
         throws Throwable;
}

Here is an example implementation:

public class MyInvocationHandler implements InvocationHandler{

  public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args)
  throws Throwable {
    //do something "dynamic"
  }
}

The proxy parameter passed to the invoke() method is the dynamic proxy object implementing the interface. Most often you don't need this object.

The Method object passed into the invoke() method represents the method called on the interface the dynamic proxy implements. From the Method object you can obtain the method name, parameter types, return type, etc. See the text on Methods for more information.

The Object[] args array contains the parameter values passed to the proxy when the method in the interface implemented was called. Note: Primitives (int, long etc) in the implemented interface are wrapped in their object counterparts (Integer, Long etc.).

Known Use Cases

Dynamic proxies are known to be used for at least the following purposes:

  • Database Connection and Transaction Management
  • Dynamic Mock Objects for Unit Testing
  • Adaptation of DI Container to Custom Factory Interfaces
  • AOP-like Method Interception

Database Connection and Transaction Management

The Spring framework has a transaction proxy that can start and commit / rollback a transaction for you. How this works is described in more detail in the text Advanced Connection and Transaction Demarcation and Propagation , so I'll only describe it briefly. The call sequence becomes something along this:

web controller --> proxy.execute(...);
  proxy --> connection.setAutoCommit(false);
  proxy --> realAction.execute();
    realAction does database work
  proxy --> connection.commit();

Dynamic Mock Objects for Unit Testing

The Butterfly Testing Tools makes use of dynamic proxies to implement dynamic stubs, mocks and proxies for unit testing. When testing a class A that uses another class B (interface really), you can pass a mock implementation of B into A instead of a real B. All method calls on B are now recorded, and you can set what return values the mock B is to return.

Furthermore Butterfly Testing Tools allow you to wrap a real B in a mock B, so that all method calls on the mock are recorded, and then forwarded to the real B. This makes it possible to check what methods were called on a real functioning B. For instance, if testing a DAO you can wrap the database connection in a mock. The DAO will not see the difference, and the DAO can read/write data to the database as usual since the mock forwards all calls to the database. But now you can check via the mock if the DAO uses the connection properly, for instance if the connection.close() is called (or NOT called), if you expected that. This is normally not possible to determine from the return value of a DAO.

Adaptation of DI Container to Custom Factory Interfaces

The dependency injection container Butterfly Container has a powerful feature that allows you to inject the whole container into beans produced by it. But, since you don't want a dependency on the container interface, the container is capable of adapting itself to a custom factory interface of your design. You only need the interface. No implementation. Thus the factory interface and your class could look something like this:

public interface IMyFactory {
  Bean   bean1();
  Person person();
  ...
}
public class MyAction{

  protected IMyFactory myFactory= null;

  public MyAction(IMyFactory factory){
    this.myFactory = factory;
  }

  public void execute(){
    Bean bean = this.myFactory.bean();
    Person person = this.myFactory.person();
  }

}

When the MyAction class calls methods on the IMyFactory instance injected into its constructor by the container, the method calls are translated into calls to the IContainer.instance() method, which is the method you use to obtain instances from the container. That way an object can use Butterfly Container as a factory at runtime, rather than only to have dependencies injected into itself at creation time. And this without having any dependencies on any Butterfly Container specific interfaces.

AOP-like Method Interception

The Spring framework makes it possible to intercept method calls to a given bean, provided that bean implements some interface. The Spring framework wraps the bean in a dynamic proxy. All calls to the bean are then intercepted by the proxy. The proxy can decide to call other methods on other objects either before, instead of, or after delegating the method call to the bean wrapped.



内容概要:本文详细介绍了“秒杀商城”微服务架构的设计与实战全过程,涵盖系统从需求分析、服务拆分、技术选型到核心功能开发、分布式事务处理、容器化部署及监控链路追踪的完整流程。重点解决了高并发场景下的超卖问题,采用Redis预减库存、消息队列削峰、数据库乐观锁等手段保障数据一致性,并通过Nacos实现服务注册发现与配置管理,利用Seata处理跨服务分布式事务,结合RabbitMQ实现异步下单,提升系统吞吐能力。同时,项目支持Docker Compose快速部署和Kubernetes生产级编排,集成Sleuth+Zipkin链路追踪与Prometheus+Grafana监控体系,构建可观测性强的微服务系统。; 适合人群:具备Java基础和Spring Boot开发经验,熟悉微服务基本概念的中高级研发人员,尤其是希望深入理解高并发系统设计、分布式事务、服务治理等核心技术的开发者;适合工作2-5年、有志于转型微服务或提升架构能力的工程师; 使用场景及目标:①学习如何基于Spring Cloud Alibaba构建完整的微服务项目;②掌握秒杀场景下高并发、超卖控制、异步化、削峰填谷等关键技术方案;③实践分布式事务(Seata)、服务熔断降级、链路追踪、统一配置中心等企业级中间件的应用;④完成从本地开发到容器化部署的全流程落地; 阅读建议:建议按照文档提供的七个阶段循序渐进地动手实践,重点关注秒杀流程设计、服务间通信机制、分布式事务实现和系统性能优化部分,结合代码调试与监控工具深入理解各组件协作原理,真正掌握高并发微服务系统的构建能力。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值