private HttpServletRequest request;
private static ThreadLocal<WebContext> wcHolder = new ThreadLocal<WebContext>();
private WebContext(){}
public static WebContext newInstance(HttpServletRequest request){
//case 1:correct
// WebContext wc = new WebContext();
// wc.request = request;
//case 2:incorrect
//(to resolve multiply creat WebContext object within one request)
WebContext wc = wcHolder.get();
if(wc==null){
wc = new WebContext();
wc.request = request;
wcHolder.set(wc);
}
return wc;
}
case 1 is correct.
but case 2
first tomcat request..
second request may get the WebContext object which belong to first req.
when step 2 happened,WebContext’s request object had diabled.
then problem happened when operate on the wc and the request object!
the question is:
is one ThreadLocal bind on Thread not right?
is one tomcat request is one Thread not right?
how correct above code ?
ps:sorry,my english is bad. :)
comment
Seeing code that captures a reference to an HttpServletRequest leads me to believe that, very soon, you will be posting a question about why your application is behaving strangely, usually confusing a response for one request as another. Be very careful when capturing a reference to a request object somewhere like a ThreadLocal. – Christopher Schultz 3 hours ago
yes,you are right.the problem had happened ,when refresh page repeatly,because get previous request obj by threadLocal.get(). i guess tomcat just assign the same thread for the repeatly browser request that moment.then app throw nullpoint error,i invoke request.getSession().getAtt.. – wangshao 2 hours ago
thanks@John Bollinger,@Christopher Schultz.now the problem had resolved. invoke WebContext.reset(),then method do ThreadLocal.remove(), within spring interceptor.preHandle method.ps thanks more patient for my bad english.i am try better.:) – wangshao 2 hours ago
ANSWER
is one ThreadLocal bind on Thread not right?
A ThreadLocal binds a separate object to each thread, yes. That’s its purpose.
is one tomcat request is one Thread not right?
Each request is handled by exactly one thread, but I’m fairly certain that Tomcat does not spawn a new thread for each request. It uses a thread pool.
Also, different requests in the same session may be served by different threads.
how correct above code ?
If the previous answers don’t explain it then I don’t know, because it’s not clear in what way you consider the behavior you observe to be incorrect.
Nevertheless, if your intent is for each request to have exactly one WebContext, unique to it, then ThreadLocals seem a poor choice for managing that. Request attributes, on the other hand, are designed for exactly that purpose. See ServletRequest.getAttribute(), ServletRequest.setAttribute(), etc..
本文探讨了使用ThreadLocal来管理每个请求对应的WebContext对象时遇到的问题。通过实例分析,揭示了在Tomcat环境下不同请求间可能因共享ThreadLocal实例而导致的数据混乱,并提出了正确的解决方案。
1100

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



