Java + Ruby + Erlang = JRE (Just Running Environment)

本文探讨了作者对于不同编程语言的看法及使用体验,包括Erlang、Java和Ruby等,并从功能性和面向对象的角度分析了它们的特点及适用场景。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

I'm recently doing a project under Ruby on Rail. It seems to be a reasonable programmer today, one should take at least > 3 languages.

Personally,

I like Erlang: lightweight process + message passing + functional programming + dynamic. It exactly matches my philosophy of looking the real world, and I think it's what functional programming should be.

Are there really Objects exist? I'm not sure. Instead, talking about OO, Object Oriented may be more sense. That is, an Object makes sense only when you orient it. All states look like being "in" an object, are with meaning only when you measure them. But, doesn't "measure" mean applying a "Function" on it? So, the states should always be carried only by functions rather than 'object', and the states are time streaming, they will be transfered from one function to another function, another function ..., so you catch the meaning of them when you track the functions chain, the meaning is based on the functions rather than the name of a Class as a member of. When you want to take a snapshot on them, you save them some where, such as showing on screen, stored in database, printed on paper what ever.

I like Java: tons of APIs + open source code base + Swing + NetBeans. So far, it has the best cross-platform UI tool kit to my eye. I like Swing, I can change or extend it easily to whatever I want. But things go easy because so many people have taken extremely efforts on it. It's bound too Objected, people split world to objects, then try to composite them or inherit something called super to make them together again. I feel pain when doing this, I have to split them, composite them in a way, then things change (or, the real world is still there), I split them, composite them in another way, again and again, it's called re-factor, but people may never catch the real Factor of the real world.

I, have to learn Ruby. Ruby and Rails are very good. For developers term, you should always know things are not so philosophy as yours, you will have guys thinking in different ways, of the real world. So Ruby is there, everyone can think the real world according to his understanding, yeah, in different ways, and, to make them not going too far away, you need rails.

So, I have to learn Java, as a tool make me doing many things interesting and painful; I have to learn Ruby, as a tool make my guys doing many things interesting and on rails; And I'll keep Erlang (Lisp/Scheme) as a tool make me not only doing but also thinking with interesting.

内容概要:本文档主要展示了C语言中关于字符串处理、指针操作以及动态内存分配的相关代码示例。首先介绍了如何实现键值对(“key=value”)字符串的解析,包括去除多余空格和根据键获取对应值的功能,并提供了相应的测试用例。接着演示了从给定字符串中分离出奇偶位置字符的方法,并将结果分别存储到两个不同的缓冲区中。此外,还探讨了常量(const)修饰符在变量和指针中的应用规则,解释了不同类型指针的区别及其使用场景。最后,详细讲解了如何动态分配二维字符数组,并实现了对这类数组的排序与释放操作。 适合人群:具有C语言基础的程序员或计算机科学相关专业的学生,尤其是那些希望深入理解字符串处理、指针操作以及动态内存管理机制的学习者。 使用场景及目标:①掌握如何高效地解析键值对字符串并去除其中的空白字符;②学会编写能够正确处理奇偶索引字符的函数;③理解const修饰符的作用范围及其对程序逻辑的影响;④熟悉动态分配二维字符数组的技术,并能对其进行有效的排序和清理。 阅读建议:由于本资源涉及较多底层概念和技术细节,建议读者先复习C语言基础知识,特别是指针和内存管理部分。在学习过程中,可以尝试动手编写类似的代码片段,以便更好地理解和掌握文中所介绍的各种技巧。同时,注意观察代码注释,它们对于理解复杂逻辑非常有帮助。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值