Comparison of popular compilers and IDEs

本文探讨了编译器和集成开发环境(IDE)的区别,解释了它们在软件开发过程中的作用。文中还对比了几种流行的编译器,如GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) 和 Microsoft Visual C/C++,以及一些常用的IDE,例如Dev-C++、Code::Blocks和Microsoft Visual Studio。

Published by chrisname
Last update on May 30, 2010 at 8:43pm UTC

  

Note: This article is a work in progress but if you do read it, please feel free to PM your improvements to me. Thanks.

The Difference

People often confuse the difference between a 'compiler' and an 'IDE', which I guess is born from the fact that most IDEs come with a compiler.

Compilers

A compiler is a program which takes source code written by a programmer and creates an executable file.

Different compilers do this in different ways -- many compilers consist of a compiler, assembler and linker, although some do the assembling and linking themselves.

A compiler, then, must create assembly code from the source code given and pass it to the assembler. The assembler creates object code from the assembly code and then passes the object files on to the linker. The linker finally creates the exectuable file that you can run.

IDEs

IDE can either stand for Integrated Drive Electronics (which is a totally irrelevant (and far more complicated) topic) or Integrated Development Environment.

An IDE is a program or (more usually) a group of programs which are used for program development. An IDE usually consists of a syntax-highlighting text editor and a lot of buttons and toolbars and such to help you to write code efficiently.

IDEs often come bundled with a compiler suite as well as a debugger and some have more advanced features such as find-and-replace and auto-completion.

Comparisons

Compilers
There are many popular compilers, among them the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) which includes gcc and g++ (the GNU C Compiler and GNU C++ Compiler) and Microsoft's Visual C and Visual C++ compilers. There are many other compilers of varying qualities, such as the Borland C/C++ compilers, the Intel C++ compiler and the [Open]Watcom Compilers. We will focus on gcc and Visual C in this article as they are the most popular compilers.

gcc/g++
  • Free/Open-Source -- gcc can be modified, derived or redistributed by anyone given that the modified/derivied/redistributed version remains licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL)
  • Cross-platform -- as gcc is open source, it has successfully been ported to various platforms including Linux, Microsoft Windows and Mac OS. If you are a Linux user you almost certainly have gcc installed already. You may have to install g++ separately, in which case you should use your distribution's package manager or download the source code. On Windows, you can find gcc in the MinGW and Cygwin packages.
  • Fast -- as a modern, optimizing compiler gcc produces relatively efficient code


Note: gcc and g++ should not be capitalized (to distinguish gcc from GCC).

Microsoft Visual C/C++
  • Free -- a version of Visual C/C++ (which may or may not be crippleware) is available for non-commercial use from Microsoft's website.
  • Debugger -- Visual C/C++ is often acclaimed for it's powerful debugger.


Others
Other compilers also exist. Among these are OpenWatcom and the Intel C++ Compiler. OpenWatcom is a cross-platform (Windows, MS-DOS, Linux and others) optimizing compiler which can produce 16-bit code (something gcc cannot do). The Intel C++ compiler provides very thorough optimization.

IDEs
Popular IDEs include

  • Dev-C++ (note: you are recommended to use wxDev-C++ instead as Dev-C++ has not been updated for 5 years)
  • Code::Blocks
  • Netbeans
  • Microsoft Visual Studio
  • Eclipse
  • KDevelop

http://www.cplusplus.com/articles/chrisname1/

 

### 回答1: 多输入多输出雷达(MIMO Radar)技术近年来的发展引起了人们的广泛关注,该技术通过多路传输方式,使用多个天线与目标进行通信和探测。MIMO雷达波形是实现该技术的关键之一,因为它直接决定了雷达的性能和精度。 MIMO雷达的波形可以分为基于时域、频域和其他非线性波形等几种类型。不同类型的波形呈现出不同的特性,对应着不同的操作模式和优化目标。时域波形具有快速改变的特点,适用于高速运动目标的检测;频域波形则具有较好的抗多径干扰能力,适用于信号传输距离较远的情况。非线性波形则在抗噪声和提高精度方面具有独特的优势。 在不同类型的波形中,采用哪种波形最优,取决于实际应用场景和需要满足的性能指标。例如,当需要检测距离较远的目标时,可以选择LFM或其他频域波形;如果需要高精度探测,可以选择非线性波形等。因此,在设计和应用MIMO雷达波形时,需要综合考虑目标检测精度、距离测量精度、抗干扰性、功耗和硬件成本等各方面因素。 最后,需要指出的是,MIMO雷达技术仍处于快速发展期,未来随着雷达硬件和处理能力的不断提升,对波形的需求和研究也将呈现不断的变化和升级。 ### 回答2: MIMO雷达技术在极化多元化和频谱效率方面具有相对优势。在MIMO雷达系统中,波形设计起着至关重要的作用,对性能指标的提升和成本的控制都有重要影响。本文将对MIMO雷达波形设计进行分析和比较。 在MIMO雷达波形设计中,需要考虑多因素:降低互化干扰、提高信噪比、提高距离分辨率、提高角度分辨率、降低成本等。常见的波形设计方法有线性调频(LFM)信号、随机相位编码(SPC)、强化线性调频(SLFM)信号和多符号信号等。 LFM信号广泛应用于雷达系统中,优点是频谱带宽窄,能够提高距离分辨率和目标精度。缺点是相位噪声和相位失调会大大降低信噪比和目标检测性能。SPC信号较少使用,其主要优点是有较好的码间关系可以降低重复检测事件的概率,而缺点是需要高功率。SLFM信号是由LFM信号和全相位余弦窗函数(CPWC)叠加而成,可以增强距离分辨率和降低旁瓣,缺点是需要较高的功率。多符号信号波形是近年来新发展出来的波形,可以提高距离和角度分辨率,具有很高的频谱效率。缺点是实现起来有一定难度,需要高精度的时钟和数字处理硬件。 不同的波形具有不同的特点和适用场景。选择合适的波形要根据实际需要进行权衡考虑,如制约因素、合适功率、带宽、方位角和开销等方面。在自适应调整系统中,合适的波形可以根据参数动态调整,以兼顾各种因素的平衡。 综上所述,MIMO雷达波形设计是MIMO雷达技术的重要组成部分,是实现MIMO雷达高性能、低成本的关键之一。各种不同的波形设计方法都有其独特的优点和缺点,取决于具体应用的情况,选择合适的波形是实现系统优化的关键。 ### 回答3: MIMO雷达的波形分析和比较 MIMO(多输入多输出)雷达技术是近年来雷达研究领域的热点之一。它通过多发射和多接收天线的方式,实现在同一时间、同一频带内,同时对多个目标进行测量,具有高分辨率、高精度、高容量等优点。MIMO雷达使用不同的波形可以实现不同的性能,因此波形的选择对于MIMO雷达系统的设计和性能至关重要。 我们可以从下面两个方面对MIMO雷达波形进行分析和比较。 一、频率分集波形(Frequency Division Waveform) 频率分集波形是一种常见的MIMO雷达波形,它通过让每个天线单独发射不同频率的调制信号,在接收端采取窄带信号来获取目标信息。频率分集波形的主要优点是其在多径环境下的抗干扰性更好。 而对于缺点,频率分集波形需要在较宽的带宽内使用多个频率,这会导致系统处理数据的时间和硬件复杂度都增加。同时,在遇到距离移位时,不同天线发射信号的相位差会增加,这会导致性能下降。 二、编码波形(Code Division Waveform) 编码波形是一种在不同天线间共享相同频率但具有不同编码序列的波形。它通过在不同接收机中进行相应的解码来获取目标信息。编码波形的主要优点是它提供了更简单的信号处理方式和更快的数据处理速度。同时它还具有更好的目标辨别率以及对于不同距离移位的抗干扰性较好。 而对于缺点,编码波形在遇到多径环境时会表现出相对较差的性能。并且,编码波形的对噪声的抗干扰性相对较弱。 综上所述,不同的MIMO雷达波形具有各自的优缺点。因此,在实际应用中需要根据系统需求和性能因素来选择最为适宜的波形,以提高系统的性能和可靠性。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值