SimpleDateFormat: Performance Pig

Just yesterday I came across this problem “in the wild” for the third time in my career so far: an application with performance problems creating tons of java.text.SimpleDateFormat instances. So, I have to get this out there: creating a new instance of SimpleDateFormat is incredibly expensive and should be minimized. In the case that prompted this post, I was using JProfiler to profile this code that parses a CSV file and discovered that 50% of the time it took to suck in the file and make 55,000 objects out of it was spent solely in the constructor of SimpleDateFormat. It created and then threw away a new one every time it had to parse a date. Whew!

“Great,” you think, “I’ll just create one, static instance, slap it in a field in a DateUtils helper class and life will be good.”

Well, more precisely, life will be good about 97% of the time. A few days after you roll that code into production you’ll discover the second cool fact that’s good to know: SimpleDateFormat is not thread safe. Your code will work just fine most of the time and all of your regression tests will probably pass, but once your system gets under a production load you’ll see the occasional exception.

“Fine,” you think, “I’ll just slap a ’synchronized’ around my use of that one, static instance.”

Ok, fine, you could do that and you’d be more or less ok, but the problem is that you’ve now taken a very common operation (date formatting and parsing) and crammed all of your otherwise-lovely, super-parallel application through a single pipe to get it done.

What would be better is to use a ThreadLocal variable so you can have your cake and eat it, too:

public class DateUtils {

    public static final String MY_STANDARD_DATE_FORMAT = "yyyyMMdd";

    public static java.util.Date parseDate(String dateString) throws ParseException {
        return getFormat().parse(dateString);
    }

	private static ThreadLocal<DateFormat> format = new ThreadLocal<DateFormat>() {
		protected synchronized DateFormat initialValue() {
			System.out.println("test");
			return new java.text.SimpleDateFormat(MY_STANDARD_DATE_FORMAT);
		}
	};

    private static DateFormat getFormat(){
        return (DateFormat) format.get();
    }
}
其实这样处理之后还是为每个需要使用线程都分配一个SimpleDateFormat的实例。
在自媒体领域,内容生产效率与作品专业水准日益成为从业者的核心关切。近期推出的Coze工作流集成方案,为内容生产者构建了一套系统化、模块化的创作支持体系。该方案通过预先设计的流程模块,贯穿选题构思、素材整理、文本撰写、视觉编排及渠道分发的完整周期,显著增强了自媒体工作的规范性与产出速率。 经过多轮实践验证,这些标准化流程不仅精简了操作步骤,减少了机械性任务的比重,还借助统一的操作框架有效控制了人为失误。由此,创作者得以将主要资源集中于内容创新与深度拓展,而非消耗于日常执行事务。具体而言,在选题环节,系统依据实时舆情数据与受众偏好模型生成热点建议,辅助快速定位创作方向;在编辑阶段,则提供多套经过验证的版式方案与视觉组件,保障内容呈现兼具美学价值与阅读流畅性。 分发推广模块同样经过周密设计,整合了跨平台传播策略与效果监测工具,涵盖社交网络运营、搜索排序优化、定向推送等多重手段,旨在帮助内容突破单一渠道局限,实现更广泛的受众触达。 该集成方案在提供成熟模板的同时,保留了充分的定制空间,允许用户根据自身创作特性与阶段目标调整流程细节。这种“框架统一、细节可变”的设计哲学,兼顾了行业通用标准与个体工作习惯,提升了工具在不同应用场景中的适应性。 从行业视角观察,此方案的问世恰逢其时,回应了自媒体专业化进程中对于流程优化工具的迫切需求。其价值不仅体现在即时的效率提升,更在于构建了一个可持续迭代的创作支持生态。通过持续吸纳用户反馈与行业趋势,系统将不断演进,助力从业者保持与行业发展同步,实现创作质量与运营效能的双重进阶。 总体而言,这一工作流集成方案的引入,标志着自媒体创作方法向系统化、精细化方向的重要转变。它在提升作业效率的同时,通过结构化的工作方法强化了内容产出的专业度与可持续性,为从业者的职业化发展提供了坚实的方法论基础。 资源来源于网络分享,仅用于学习交流使用,请勿用于商业,如有侵权请联系我删除!
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值