| Microsoft SQL Server | Oracle | Comment |
|
| ||
| - | ||
| NUMBER(3) | - | |
| CHAR | - | |
| Fractional parts of a second are truncated | ||
| NUMBER(p[,s]) | - | |
| FLOAT(49) | - | |
| - | ||
| NUMBER(10) | NUMBER range is -2,147,483,647 to 2,147,483,647 | |
| NUMBER(19,4) | - | |
| NCHAR | - | |
| - | ||
| NCHAR | - | |
| NUMBER(p[,s]) | - | |
| FLOAT(23) | - | |
| DATE | The value for seconds is returned as 0 | |
| NUMBER(10,4) | - | |
| NUMBER(5) | NUMBER range is -32,767 to 32,767 | |
| LONG | - | |
| RAW | - | |
| NUMBER(3) | - | |
| CHAR(36) |
| |
| RAW | - | |
| VARCHAR2 | - |
SQL Server 与 Oracle数据类型映射
SQL Server与Oracle数据库比较
本文对比了Microsoft SQL Server和Oracle数据库的特点、功能和应用场景,包括数据类型、性能指标、安全性等方面,帮助开发者选择合适的数据库。


被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



