转:Web Applications and OSGi

本文讨论了在OSGi环境中部署Web应用程序的优点及挑战,并介绍了Spring Dynamic Modules如何通过直接集成Web容器来提供全面的Servlet 2.4/2.5规格支持。

Web Applications and OSGi


Since the first milestones of Spring Dynamic Modules, requests for running web applications in OSGi started to come in. It has been probably one of the most requested features and no wonder, once 1.0 final was released, web support has been the main focus of the 1.1 branch. I am pleased to report that, with the just released M2, as already hinted by Juergen , Spring-DM supports not just vanilla wars (available since 1.1.0 M1) but also Spring-MVC applications running inside OSGi. In this entry, I would like to briefly discuss the typical OSGi web scenario and Spring-DM's approach. But first,

Why deploy WARs in OSGi?

Easy question: OSGi natively provides versioning, package wiring and hot reloading. Imagine taking advantage of these features within your applications: you can stop embedding libraries under WEB-INF/lib and start sharing them between your web apps, avoid taglibs duplications (while keeping multiple versions running) and update, at runtime, only certain parts of your application. This is especially useful as web applications tend to be tiered and thus subject to a significant number of changes during their life cycle.

Why are web applications in OSGi problematic?

The Servlet specification revolves around the idea of a web container : a runtime environment for web components that provides standard services such as life cycle management (object creation and disposal, thread allocation), concurrency, HTTP request handling and so on. The OSGi platform on the other hand, acts also as a managed environment with its Service Registry, package wiring and versioning (to name just a few). To deal with this problem, the OSGi committee designed, part of the compendium specification, the Http Service .

As a side note, when dealing with two managed environments, one is facing an interesting problem: what deployment model to use? That is which is be the bootstrapping platform and which one embedded? In our case, one can either deploy the OSGi platform as a WAR or deploy the web container (under some form of service), inside the OSGi platform. More about this though, in a future entry.

This optional service provides a simple API for registering Servlet s and static resources which are mapped to incoming HTTP requests. In order to have a Servlet serving requests inside OSGi, one must programmatically create the Servlet instance and registered it through the aforementioned API. Further more, the Http service supports only the Servlet 2.1 specification which can be quite inconvenient since filters and listeners (used by virtually all of the web frameworks today) are not available.
Most (if not all) of the solutions available today (that I am aware of), for running web applications in OSGi, rely on the Http Service for their functionality. Some address the problems mentioned above using one of the following techniques (as far as I know):

  • eliminate the need for code by imposing new or translating existing declarative approaches (such as web.xml ) into calls to the Http Service
  • provide Servlet 2.1+ features by building on top of the 2.1 API (for example a filter can be implemented by decorating a Servlet instance) or by extending the standard API

Both of these methods can be successful and go a long way however, in Spring-DM, we opted for a different, unique approach by:

Integrating directly with the web container

In Spring-DM, the OSGi and container space are bridged: the WARs, deployed as usual to the web container, use the OSGi space for their class path and resource lookups. The main advantage of this approach is that to both the OSGi platform and the web container, nothing major has changed - it is just "business as usual".

With Spring-DM one gets:

  • full Servlet 2.4/2.5, JSP 2.0/2.1 spec support
  • availability of the container capabilities (blocking vs non-blocking IO, allocated threads in the thread pool and so on)
  • complete access to web.xml syntax whether it's about filters, listeners, mapping declaration, security or even jndi references. This is especially useful in cases where the container is integrated with a JTA Transaction Manager or a JMS queue. Note that Spring-DM does no parsing (we figured the container does this a lot better then we can)
  • container specific configuration files (such as Tomcat's META-INF/context.xml )

All of the above and much more are possible since Spring-DM deploys bundles natively to the chosen web container (currently Apache Tomcat 5.5.x/6.0.x and Jetty 6.1.x+ are supported out of the box). This means that it's the web container that instantiates and manages the web application and thus pretty much everything that the container supports is available to the OSGi bundles.

Though 1.1 is not yet final, I encourage you to give M2 a try. The API s are pretty much stable and the new features documented (more to come as we approach the GA release) - if you need help, check out the Spring-DM forum (yes, we finally have one) and the mailing list . Additionally, if you happen to be at JavaOne, stop by the SpringSource booth and you will get the answers from the source.

内容概要:本文详细介绍了“秒杀商城”微服务架构的设计与实战全过程,涵盖系统从需求分析、服务拆分、技术选型到核心功能开发、分布式事务处理、容器化部署及监控链路追踪的完整流程。重点解决了高并发场景下的超卖问题,采用Redis预减库存、消息队列削峰、数据库乐观锁等手段保障数据一致性,并通过Nacos实现服务注册发现与配置管理,利用Seata处理跨服务分布式事务,结合RabbitMQ实现异步下单,提升系统吞吐能力。同时,项目支持Docker Compose快速部署和Kubernetes生产级编排,集成Sleuth+Zipkin链路追踪与Prometheus+Grafana监控体系,构建可观测性强的微服务系统。; 适合人群:具备Java基础和Spring Boot开发经验,熟悉微服务基本概念的中高级研发人员,尤其是希望深入理解高并发系统设计、分布式事务、服务治理等核心技术的开发者;适合工作2-5年、有志于型微服务或提升架构能力的工程师; 使用场景及目标:①学习如何基于Spring Cloud Alibaba构建完整的微服务项目;②掌握秒杀场景下高并发、超卖控制、异步化、削峰填谷等关键技术方案;③实践分布式事务(Seata)、服务熔断降级、链路追踪、统一配置中心等企业级中间件的应用;④完成从本地开发到容器化部署的全流程落地; 阅读建议:建议按照文档提供的七个阶段循序渐进地动手实践,重点关注秒杀流程设计、服务间通信机制、分布式事务实现和系统性能优化部分,结合代码调试与监控工具深入理解各组件协作原理,真正掌握高并发微服务系统的构建能力。
评论
成就一亿技术人!
拼手气红包6.0元
还能输入1000个字符
 
红包 添加红包
表情包 插入表情
 条评论被折叠 查看
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值