SORT AGGREGATE

本文详细解释了SQL中的SORTAGGREGATE与GROUP BY两个选项的区别及其在不同场景下的应用,包括它们如何影响执行计划和性能。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

SORT AGGREGATE做为sort的option之一比较特殊,他并不做sort

SORT AGGREGATE作用于所有的data set上,用于aggregate function,例如sum, count, avg, min, max

SQL> select max(x) from test;
 
 
Execution Plan
--------------------------------------------------------
--
   0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=5)

  
1    0   SORT (AGGREGATE)
  
2    1     INDEX (FULL SCAN (MIN/MAX)) OF 'TEST_IDX' (NON-UNIQUE) (
          
Cost=3 Card=7140 Bytes=35700)
 
Statistics
--------------------------------------------------------
--
          0  recursive calls

          
0  db block gets
          
2  consistent gets
          
0  physical reads
          
0  redo size
        
491  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        
650  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          
2  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          
0  sorts (memory)   -- no sort here
          
0  sorts (disk)
          
1  rows processed

如果aggregate function不是作用于与所有的data set上,还是作用于不同的group上,那么操作类型将会变为SORT (GROUP BY),这时会有sort发生

SQL> select x,count(*) from test group by x;
 
7138 rows selected.
 
 
Execution Plan
--------------------------------------------------------
--
   0      SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=20 Card=7137 Bytes=3

          
5685)
 
  
1    0   SORT (GROUP BY) (Cost=20 Card=7137 Bytes=35685)
  
2    1     TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'TEST' (Cost=3 Card=7140 Bytes=35
          
700)
 
Statistics
--------------------------------------------------------
--
          0  recursive calls

          
0  db block gets
        
19  consistent gets
          
0  physical reads
          
0  redo size
    
151790  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
      
5875  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
        
477  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          
1  sorts (memory)
          
0  sorts (disk)
      
7138  rows processed
请帮我分析下面两个执行计划哪个更好 第一个执行计划如下 SELECT STATEMENT Cost = 6 +-HASH JOIN 1 rows (50 bytes) 1 sec. "DYL"."DYL_AEL_BUTEN_CODE"="NEW_MI_DYL"."DYL_AEL_BUTEN_CODE" AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_ACCOUNT_NUMBER"="NEW_MI_DYL"."DYL_AEL_ACCOUNT_NUMBER" AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_SEQ_NUMBER"="NEW_MI_DYL"."DYL_AEL_SEQ_NUMBER" AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_INPUT_DATE"="NEW_MI_DYL"."MAX_DYL_AEL_INPUT_DATE" +-NESTED LOOPS 1 rows (50 bytes) 1 sec. | +-NESTED LOOPS 1 rows (50 bytes) 1 sec. | | +-STATISTICS COLLECTOR sec. | | | +-VIEW 1 rows (28 bytes) 1 sec. | | | +-HASH GROUP BY 1 rows (20 bytes) 1 sec. | | | +-INDEX RANGE SCAN (ETINTRA.DUPL_AND_YELLOW_CHK_LIST_PK "MI_TDYL"@"SEL$2") 1 rows (20 bytes) 1 sec. "MI_TDYL"."DYL_AEL_BUTEN_CODE"='X98' AND "MI_TDYL"."DYL_AEL_ACCOUNT_NUMBER"=100000 AND "MI_TDYL"."DYL_AEL_SEQ_NUMBER"='1' | | +-INDEX RANGE SCAN (ETINTRA.DUPL_AND_YELLOW_CHK_LIST_PK "DYL"@"SEL$1") 1 rows 1 sec. "DYL"."DYL_AEL_BUTEN_CODE"='X98' AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_ACCOUNT_NUMBER"=100000 AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_SEQ_NUMBER"='1' AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_INPUT_DATE"="NEW_MI_DYL"."MAX_DYL_AEL_INPUT_DATE" | +-TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID (ETINTRA.DUPL_AND_YELLOW_CHK_LIST "DYL"@"SEL$1") 1 rows (22 bytes) 1 sec. +-TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BATCHED (ETINTRA.DUPL_AND_YELLOW_CHK_LIST "DYL"@"SEL$1") 1 rows (22 bytes) 1 sec. +-INDEX RANGE SCAN (ETINTRA.DUPL_AND_YELLOW_CHK_LIST_PK "DYL"@"SEL$1") 1 rows 1 sec. "DYL"."DYL_AEL_BUTEN_CODE"='X98' AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_ACCOUNT_NUMBER"=100000 AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_SEQ_NUMBER"='1' 第二个执行计划如下 SELECT STATEMENT Cost = 7 +-TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BATCHED (ETINTRA.DUPL_AND_YELLOW_CHK_LIST "DYL"@"SEL$1") 1 rows (22 bytes) 1 sec. +-INDEX RANGE SCAN (ETINTRA.DUPL_AND_YELLOW_CHK_LIST_PK "DYL"@"SEL$1") 1 rows 1 sec. "DYL"."DYL_AEL_BUTEN_CODE"='X98' AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_ACCOUNT_NUMBER"=100000 AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_SEQ_NUMBER"='1' AND "DYL"."DYL_AEL_INPUT_DATE"= (SELECT MAX("MI_TDYL"."DYL_AEL_INPUT_DATE") FROM "DUPL_AND_YELLOW_CHK_LIST" "MI_TDYL" WHERE "MI_TDYL"."DYL_AEL_SEQ_NUMBER"='1' AND "MI_TDYL"."DYL_AEL_ACCOUNT_NUMBER"=100000 AND "MI_TDYL"."DYL_AEL_BUTEN_CODE"='X98') +-SORT AGGREGATE 1 rows (20 bytes) sec. +-FIRST ROW 1 rows (20 bytes) 1 sec. +-INDEX RANGE SCAN (MIN/MAX) (ETINTRA.DUPL_AND_YELLOW_CHK_LIST_PK "MI_TDYL"@"SEL$2") 1 rows (20 bytes) 1 sec. "MI_TDYL"."DYL_AEL_BUTEN_CODE"='X98' AND "MI_TDYL"."DYL_AEL_ACCOUNT_NUMBER"=100000 AND "MI_TDYL"."DYL_AEL_SEQ_NUMBER"='1'
05-22
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值