hibernate persist() vs save()

最新推荐文章于 2021-03-02 20:34:32 发布

StudyWorks

最新推荐文章于 2021-03-02 20:34:32 发布

阅读量178

点赞数

分类专栏： java 文章标签： Hibernate

java 专栏收录该内容

5 篇文章

订阅专栏

本文对比分析了persist()和save()两种持久化方法的特点及适用场景。persist()确保实例持久化，但不立即分配标识符，适用于长时间对话的扩展会话。save()返回标识符并可能立即执行插入操作。

摘要生成于 C知道，由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持，前往体验 >

persist() is well defined. It makes a transient instance persistent. However, it doesn't guarantee that the identifier value will be assigned to the persistent instance immediately, the assignment might happen at flush time. The spec doesn't say that, which is the problem I have with persist().

persist() also guarantees that it will not execute an INSERT statement if it is called outside of transaction boundaries. This is useful in long-running conversations with an extended Session/persistence context.

A method like persist() is required.

save() does not guarantee the same, it returns an identifier, and if an INSERT has to be executed to get the identifier (e.g. "identity" generator, not "sequence"), this INSERT happens immediately, no matter if you are inside or outside of a transaction. This is not good in a long-running conversation with an extended Session/persistence context.